Section 80P(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.149

Section 80P(2)(c) falls under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 149 (Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 149 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80P(2)(c) is Jt. CIT v. Tractors and Farm Equipments Ltd. (104 ITD 149), cited in 118 of the 93 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(c)

Jt. CIT v. Tractors and Farm Equipments Ltd.
104 ITD 149 · 2007 · ITAT
118
citing judgments

A delay in filing an appeal cannot be condoned if it is attributable to the assessee's negligence or inaction, such as misplacing and forgetting the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. The provisions relating to limitation apply with rigour, and a lack of due care and attention is not a sufficient reason for condonation.

CIT v. Solapur Nagri Audyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd.
182 Taxmann 231 · Reported
50
citing judgments
Mani Mandir Sewa Nyas Samiti Ramghat Ayodhya v. CIT
119 Taxmann.com 383 · 2020 · Supreme Court
45
citing judgments

The Supreme Court dismisses appeals seeking condonation of excessive delay in filing, especially when the reasons provided for the delay, such as attributing it to an employee, are not found to be sufficient or convincing.

Sind Co-operative Housing Society v. ITO
317 ITR 47 · 2009 · High Court
32
citing judgments

The doctrine of mutuality applies to co-operative societies, preventing income derived from members from being taxed as income from other sources. The court affirmed that the principle of mutuality, as accepted by the jurisdictional High Court, should be followed.

T.Kishan, Secunderabad v. ACIT, Central Circle-1, Hyd
23 Taxmann.com 383 · 2012 · Reported
21
citing judgments
Royal Stitches (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
156 Taxmann.com 361 · 2023 · High Court
19
citing judgments

A High Court refuses to condone a significant delay in filing an appeal when the assessee fails to provide a 'sufficient cause' for the delay. The court emphasizes that assessees must be vigilant in pursuing their rights.

CIT (2016)(72 Taxmann.com 64)(Gujarat) 3. Sri Basaveshwara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. v. CIT
47 Taxmann.com 189 · 2014 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Income earned by a co-operative society on deposits made with banks is not considered attributable to its credit facilities business and therefore falls outside the scope of deduction under Section 80P.

Builders (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax
174 Taxmann.com 534 · 2025 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Appeals are dismissed as time-barred when the assessee, aware of counsel's negligence causing a significant delay in filing, fails to inquire about the appeal status and attempts to shift responsibility to the lawyer.

Jaoli Taluka Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit v. ITO
83 Taxmann.com 247 · 2017 · Reported
9
citing judgments
Mantola Co-op Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO
118 Taxmann.com 276 · 2020 · High Court
8
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 80P(2)(c)

The Chanour Co-Operative Aggriculture Service Society Limited, Kangra vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - Dharamshala, Dharamshala

The appeal stand allowed

ITA 464/CHANDI/2024[2017-18 ]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 Apr 2025

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Laliet Kumar & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No. 464/Chandi/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) The Chanour Co-Operative Agriculture Ito - Dharamshala Service Society Ltd. Himachal Pradesh. बनाम/ C/O Shri Tejmohan Singh Vs. #527, Sector-10D Chandigarh – 160011 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aacat-7465-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Adv.) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma (Addl. Cit) – Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-04-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22-04-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 28-02-2024 Confirming Penalty U/S 270A For Rs.57,715/- As Levied By Ld. Ao Vide Order Dated 14-12-2021 In The Matter Of Quantum Assessment As Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S. 143(3) On 23-12-2019. Having Heard Rival Submissions & Upon Perusal Of Case Records, The Appeal Is Disposed-Off As Under.

For Appellant: Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Adv.) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(c)