Jaoli Taluka Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit v. ITO

83 Taxmann.com 247Reported decision2017#12112 most cited
9

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Jaoli Taluka Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit v. ITO

MUMBAI POSTAL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 17(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1051/MUM/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singhita Nos.1050 & 1051/Mum/2023 (A.Ys. 2015-16 & 2016-17) Mumbai Postal Employees Vs. Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Credit Ward 17(2)(1) Society Limited, Gpo Room No. 115, 1 St Floor, Building, Fort, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To Mumbai – 400001 C-43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaajm0032G Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Madhur Agarwal &For Respondent: Neena Jeph
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…P a g e | 1 ITA Nos. 1050 & 1051/Mum/2023 Mumbai Postal Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 17(2)(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1050 & 1051/Mum/2023 (A.Ys. 2015-16 & 2016-17) Mumbai Postal Employees Vs. Income Tax Officer, Co-operative Credit Ward 17(2)(1) Society Limited, GPO Room No. 115, 1 st Floor, Building, Fort, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to Mumbai – 400001 C-43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAAJM0032…

MUMBAI POSTAL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 17(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1050/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singhita Nos.1050 & 1051/Mum/2023 (A.Ys. 2015-16 & 2016-17) Mumbai Postal Employees Vs. Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Credit Ward 17(2)(1) Society Limited, Gpo Room No. 115, 1 St Floor, Building, Fort, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To Mumbai – 400001 C-43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaajm0032G Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Madhur Agarwal &For Respondent: Neena Jeph
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…P a g e | 1 ITA Nos. 1050 & 1051/Mum/2023 Mumbai Postal Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 17(2)(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1050 & 1051/Mum/2023 (A.Ys. 2015-16 & 2016-17) Mumbai Postal Employees Vs. Income Tax Officer, Co-operative Credit Ward 17(2)(1) Society Limited, GPO Room No. 115, 1 st Floor, Building, Fort, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to Mumbai – 400001 C-43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAAJM0032…

CEAT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. NFAC , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 159/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singhceat Employees Co- Vs. Nfac Operative Credit Society Income Tax Officer Ltd., Ground Floor, Cpb Bangalore C/O Ceat Ltd. Bhandup Village Road, Bhandup West Mumbai – 400078 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaaac0547M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shekhar Patwardhan Respondent By : C.T. Mathews Date Of Hearing 21.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 26.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): The Present Appeal Filed By The Assesse Is Directed Against The Order Passed By Nfac, Delhi Dated 21.11.2022 For A.Y. 2017-18. The Assesse Has Raised The Following Grounds Before Us: “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & Also In Law The Learned Cit Appeals Has Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Of The Deduction Claimed By The Appellant U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) 80P(2)(D) To The Tune Of Rs.1014680/- Though The Appellant Is Very Much Entitled For The Same 2. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Amend & Modify The Aforesaid Grounds Of Appeal At Or Any Time Before The Hearing As May Be Advised From Time To Time.” 2. The Fact In Brief Is That Assesse Is A Cooperative Society Carrying On The Business Of Giving Credit Facilities To Its Members For The Last Several Years. The Assessee Has Filed Return Of Income Declaring Total

For Appellant: Shekhar PatwardhanFor Respondent: C.T. Mathews
Section 143(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…P a g e | 1 Ceat Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. NFAC IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ceat Employees Co- Vs. NFAC operative Credit Society Income Tax Officer Ltd., Ground Floor, CPB Bangalore C/o Ceat Ltd. Bhandup Village Road, Bhandup West Mumbai – 400078 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAAAC0547M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shekhar Patwardhan Respondent by : C.T. Mathews Date of Hearing 21.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 26.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (AM): The present appeal filed by the asses…