GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS EMPLOYEE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CPC's disallowance under Section 143(1)(a)(ii) was not in accordance with the law. The assessee is a Co-operative Credit Society and is eligible for the claimed deductions under Section 80P.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Co-operative Credit Society, filed its return of income claiming deductions under Section 80P. The CPC processed the return under Section 143(1) and disallowed these deductions, leading to the present appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of deduction claimed by a Co-operative Credit Society under Section 80P by the CPC under Section 143(1) was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 250,Section 139(1),Section 10AA,Section 80-IA,Section 80-IAB,Section 80-IB,Section 80-IC,Section 80-ID,Section 80-IE,Section 80P(2)(d),Section 80P(2)(c),Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80P(2)(a)(ii),Section 80P(2)(a)(iii),Section 80P(2)(a)(iv),Section 80P(2)(a)(v),Section 80P(2)(a)(vi),Section 80P(2)(a)(vii),Section 80P(2)(b),Section 80P(2)(c)(i),Section 80P(2)(c)(ii),Section 80P(2)(e),Section 80(2)(f)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “A” :: PUNE
Before: MS.ASTHA CHANDRA & DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal)-2, Visakhapatnamunder section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.01.2025 emanating from the Assessment Order passed under section 143(1) of the Act, dated 02.12.2020 for AY 2019-20.The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
ITA No.793/PUN/2025 [A] “1. On the facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions and scheme of the Act CPC has erred in not allowing the deduction u/s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 139(1)
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 485/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026