Section 244A of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.437

Section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 437 (Interest on refunds) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 437 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 244A is ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd. (117 ITD 169), cited in 151 of the 1,186 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 244A

ITO v. Daga Capital Management (P) Ltd.
117 ITD 169 · 2009 · ITAT
151
citing judgments
Otis Elevator Co. (India) Ltd. v. CIT
195 ITR 682 · 1992 · High Court
131
citing judgments

Club membership fees, including both entrance fees and annual subscriptions, are not considered capital expenditure if the membership's continuance depends on regular payments, and therefore are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1).

CIT v. Karnataka Power Corporation
247 ITR 268 · 2001 · Supreme Court
124
citing judgments

Income earned during the project construction stage, which has a direct nexus or is inextricably linked to the project's setting up, constitutes a capital receipt not liable to tax and reduces the project cost.

Wipro Ltd. v. DCIT
382 ITR 179 · 2016 · High Court
122
citing judgments

Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowable even if no tax is paid in India on the corresponding income due to deductions under sections 10A or 10AA, or losses in other units. The scope of income eligible for deduction under Section 10AA includes interest on deposits and realized gains on forward contracts.

DDIT v. Savvis Communication Corporation
69 Taxmann.com 106 · 2016 · ITAT
107
citing judgments

Payments for web hosting services, including data back-up, maintenance, security, and uninterrupted services, are not taxable as royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, as they do not constitute 'consideration for use of, or right to use, scientific equipment'.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT, Range10(2), Mumbai
234 CTR 1 · 2010 · High Court
97
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an assessee in relation to income not forming part of the total income is not deductible under Section 14A(1). The disallowance must be restricted to direct and indirect expenses having an approximate connection with the earning of such exempt income, and Rule 8D applies from Assessment Year 2008-09.

Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT
280 ITR 643 · 2006 · Supreme Court
96
citing judgments

Assessees are entitled to compensation for the inordinate delay by the Income Tax Department in refunding excess tax, which includes interest on the statutory interest due under section 244A for such delayed refunds.

Union of India v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
363 ITR 658 · 2014 · Supreme Court
91
citing judgments

The Department has a moral and legal obligation to refund excess tax collected from taxpayers, along with interest. An assessee is entitled to interest on the amount of taxes refunded, including interest on interest, as per Section 244A of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Dinesh Kumar Goel
331 ITR 10 · 2011 · High Court
87
citing judgments

Income is recognized when it is absolutely ascertained, determined, and specified, conferring an exclusive right of receipt upon the assessee, irrespective of the accounting period.

Sunil Siddharthbhai v. CIT
156 ITR 509 · 1985 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

A partner's contribution of a personal asset to a partnership firm does not amount to a "transfer" for capital gains purposes under the Income-tax Act, as the consideration (the partner's interest in the firm) is indeterminate, and the computational machinery for capital gains fails.

Judgments on Section 244A

Kalinga Institute of Social Scinces(Kiss), Patia vs. CIT (Exemption)- Hyderabad, Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 47/CTK/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack19 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अऩीऱ सं/Ita No.47/Ctk/2022 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2017-2018) Kalinga Institute Of Social Sciences Vs Cit(Exemption), Hyderabad At (Kiss), Bhubaneswar Plot No.582/1540, Kiit Campus-10 Patia, Bhubaneswar-751024 Pan No. :Aaaak 7721 R (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.K.Agrawalla & S.K.Hota, Ars राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19/01/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19/01/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld.Cit(E), Hyderabad At Bhubaneswar, Dated 14.03.2022, Passed In Din & Order No.Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2021-22/1040706357(1) For The Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That The Assessee Is A Trust, Who Is Enjoying The Benefit Of Registration U/S.12A & 80G Of The Act. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Had Received Corpus Donations From M/S Kalinga Institute Of Industrial Technology (Kiit) In The Form Of Incurrence Of Capital Expenditure Of Rs.21,65,00,000/- & An Amount Of Rs.25,00,000/- From Container Corporation Of India (Cci). It Was Submitted That As Per The Mou Between The Assessee & Container Corporation Of India, The Container Corporation Of India Has Provided

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla & S.K.Hota, ARsFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263

New Era High School Committee, Satara vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Exemption Circle, Pune

The appeal of the appellant is ALLOWED in above terms

ITA 622/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S.S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 622/Pun/2022 कर धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2018-19 New Era High School Committee Chesson Rd., Panchgani, Satara - 412805 Pan : Aaatn2455L . . . . . . . अपीलाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemption Circle-8, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यथी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Rohit Tapadiya Revenue By : Shri Suhas Kulkarni सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/12/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 30/12/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; By The Present Appeal, The Assessee Challenges The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short “Nfac”] Dt. 13/06/2022 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”] Confirming Order Of Rectification Passed U/S 154 Which Denied To Interfere With Computation Of Income Carried Out U/S 143(3) Passed By National E-Asstt. Centre [For Short “Neas”] For Assessment Year [For Short “Ay”] 2018-19. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 7

For Appellant: Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri Suhas Kulkarni
Section 1Section 119Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 199Section 206CSection 234A