KALINGA INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCINCES(KISS),PATIA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION)- HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 47/CTK/2022Status: HeardITAT Cuttack19 January 2023AY 2017-184 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the issue of corpus donations during the assessment proceedings. The CIT(E) failed to verify the additional information provided by the assessee in response to the show cause notice.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust registered under sections 12A and 80G, received corpus donations. The CIT(E) invoked revisionary powers under Section 263, setting aside the assessment order for inadequate verification of these donations.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) was justified in invoking Section 263 powers for alleged inadequate verification of corpus donations when the AO had already examined the issue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 12A,Section 80G,Section 244A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

Hearing: 19/01/2023Pronounced: 19/01/2023

O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld.CIT(E), Hyderabad at Bhubaneswar, dated 14.03.2022, passed in DIN & Order No.ITBA/REV/F/REV5/2021-22/1040706357(1) for the assessment year 2017-2018.

2.

It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee is a trust, who is enjoying the benefit of registration u/s.12A & 80G of the Act. It was submitted that the assessee had received corpus donations from M/s Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) in the form of incurrence of capital expenditure of Rs.21,65,00,000/- and an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- from Container Corporation of India (CCI). It was submitted that as per the MOU between the assessee and Container Corporation of India, the Container Corporation of India has provided Rs.25 lakhs corpus donation to the assessee for the purpose of setting up of tailoring unit for teaching tailoring to backward tribal girls in Orissa. The assessment in the case of the assessee had been completed and the AO had examined the issue of the corpus donations received from the Container Corporation of India and also from M/s KIIT. It was the submission that corpus donations of M/s KIIT was in the form of the construction of an educational building and the purchase of electronic equipments. It was the submission that the ld. CIT(E) issued the show cause notice on 18.01.2022 on the ground that the AO has not done proper verification of the said corpus donations received by the assessee. It was the submission that the assessee had replied to the ld. CIT(E) and had also provided the copy of the MOU between the assessee and the Container Corporation of India along with the details of the building constructed by M/s KIIT for the assessee. It was also submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee submitted before the ld. CIT(E) that even if the two corpus donations are treated as the income of the assessee, still the taxable income would be a negative figure and, therefore, there could be no prejudice to the interest of revenue. It was the submission that the ld. CIT(E) without considering the explanation of the assessee had invoked his powers u/s.263 of the Act and set aside the assessment order passed u/s.143(3) of the Act on the issue of the verification of the corpus donations. It was further submitted that in page 6 of the order of the ld. CIT(E) passed u/s.263 of the Act, the ld.CIT(E) has held that the AO has wrongly charged interest u/s.244A of the Act and has directed the AO to

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →