Section 178(6) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.322

Section 178(6) falls under section 178 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 322 (Company in liquidation) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 322 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 178(6) is Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction (126 Taxmann.com 132), cited in 192 of the 39 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 178(6)

Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
126 Taxmann.com 132 · 2021 · Supreme Court
192
citing judgments

Once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31(1) of the IBC, claims not included in the plan are extinguished and cannot be pursued. This applies to statutory dues owed to the government and other authorities.

Krishnaswamy S. Pd v. Union of India
281 ITR 305 · 2006 · Supreme Court
68
citing judgments

The law does not compel individuals to perform impossible actions. The administration of law must consider this general exception in specific cases, acknowledging that it does not intend to compel impossibilities.

Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons (P.) Ltd. v. Edelweis Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
9 SCC 657 · 2021 · Reported
33
citing judgments

All claims, including statutory dues, that predate the approval of a resolution plan under the IBC stand extinguished by operation of law. No proceedings can be initiated or continued for such claims if they are not part of the approved plan.

CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd.
284 ITR 434 · 2006 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is not attracted in cases where income is assessed under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions under section 115JB.

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd.
138 Taxmann.com 73 · 2022 · Supreme Court
28
citing judgments

The moratorium period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, will be excluded when calculating the limitation period for proceedings involving a corporate debtor. The Assessing Officer can seek re-institution of an appeal if the resolution process concludes.

236 ITR 832 (Guj) (para 21) Snowcem India Ltd. v. Deputy CIT
313 ITR 170 · 2009 · High Court
21
citing judgments

Reopening assessment proceedings under Section 147 is permissible within four years, even if full and true particulars were provided during the original assessment, provided the Assessing Officer forms a prima facie opinion of underassessment or escapement of income.

CIT v. Natural Gems Ltd.
327 ITR 269 · 2010 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is not leviable on tax determined under the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions, especially when prevailing judicial pronouncements supported this view at the relevant time. However, subsequent Supreme Court decisions have clarified that interest is leviable even under MAT provisions.

Palogix Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
135 Taxmann.com 73 · 2022 · ITAT
15
citing judgments

Appeals filed by a corporate debtor before the Tribunal are dismissed as infructuous when proceedings cannot continue against the corporate debtor after an NCLT order, due to the moratorium period under the IBC Code.

Kohinoor Steel (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer
159 Taxmann.com 571 · 2024 · Reported
14
citing judgments

Proceedings against a corporate debtor cannot continue after an order by the NCLT initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

NDMC v. Minosha (India) Ltd.
8 SCC 384 · 2012 · Reported
14
citing judgments

The entire moratorium period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is excluded when computing the limitation period for proceedings concerning a corporate debtor. This provision takes precedence over the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Judgments on Section 178(6)

Videocon Oil Ventures Ltd, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer Range 3(3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 5880/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.5880/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2014-15) M/S. Videocon Oil Ventures बिधम/ Ito, Range-3(3)(4) Ltd Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Vs. 171-C, Mittal Court, Road, Mumbai-400020. Nariman Point, Mumbai- 400021. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aadcv1810B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Ms. Vatsalaa Jha (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 10/08/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 02/09/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Assessing Officer (Hereinafter “Ao”) Dated 17.09.2018 Passed U/S 143(3) Read With Section 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter “The Act”). 2. At The Outset, It Is Noted That Despite The Appeal Being Fixed Before This Tribunal For Hearing Several Times, The Assessee Is Not Represented By Their Authorized Representative Even Though Notices Has Been Sent To Them Informing About The Hearing. So We Are Inclined To Dispose Of The Appeal Filed In The Year 2018. 3. The Ld. Dr Brought To Our Notice About A Correspondence From The Assessee From Perusal Of Which It Transpires That Against The Assessee Company M/S Vovl Ltd (Formerly Known As Videocon Oil Venture Ltd) (“Corporate Debtor”) Cirp Proceedings [I.E. Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process] As Per The Insolvency & Bankruptcy

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Vatsalaa Jha (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

Bombay Rayon Fashions Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cent. Cir 6(3), Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are dismissed in limini

ITA 1837/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1837/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Dcit Cen. Cir-6(3), Bombay Rayon Fashions 19Th Floor, Air India Limited बनाम/ Building, Nariman Point, Dlh Mangal Murti Building, 3Rd Vs. Mumbai-400 021 Floor, Linking Road, Santacruz (West), Mumbai-400 054 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aaacm3447J (अपीलधथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 2389/Mum/2021 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Bombay Rayon Dcit Cen. Cir-6(3), Fashions Limited 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Dlh Mangal Murti बनाम/ Building, 3Rd Floor, Vs. Linking Road, Santacruz (West), Mumbai-400 054 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aaacm3447J (अपीलधथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलधथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Pravesh Advani, Ld. Ar प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Dr. Mahesh Akhade, Ld. Dr सुनवधईकीतधरीख/ : 03.08.2022 Date Of Hearing घोर्णधकीतधरीख / : 23.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Pravesh Advani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade, Ld. DR
Section 14Section 143(3)Section 178(6)Section 7

Unity Infrasporjects Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3484/MUM/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3484 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2006-07) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3478 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2007-08) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3480 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2008-09) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3479 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3482/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3481/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3483/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2012-13) बिधम/ M/S. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-8(2) 1252,Pushpanjali (Erstwhile, Acit, Central Vs. Apartments, Old Prabhadevi Circle-45) Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400025. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu4560E .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

Unity Infrasporjects Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3483/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3484 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2006-07) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3478 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2007-08) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3480 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2008-09) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3479 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3482/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3481/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3483/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2012-13) बिधम/ M/S. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-8(2) 1252,Pushpanjali (Erstwhile, Acit, Central Vs. Apartments, Old Prabhadevi Circle-45) Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400025. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu4560E .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

Unity Infrasporjects Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3482/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3484 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2006-07) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3478 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2007-08) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3480 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2008-09) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3479 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3482/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3481/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3483/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2012-13) बिधम/ M/S. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-8(2) 1252,Pushpanjali (Erstwhile, Acit, Central Vs. Apartments, Old Prabhadevi Circle-45) Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400025. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu4560E .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

Unity Infrasporjects Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3481/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3484 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2006-07) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3478 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2007-08) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3480 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2008-09) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3479 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3482/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3481/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3483/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2012-13) बिधम/ M/S. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-8(2) 1252,Pushpanjali (Erstwhile, Acit, Central Vs. Apartments, Old Prabhadevi Circle-45) Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400025. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu4560E .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

Unity Infrasporjects Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3480/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3484 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2006-07) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3478 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2007-08) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3480 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2008-09) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3479 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3482/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3481/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3483/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2012-13) बिधम/ M/S. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-8(2) 1252,Pushpanjali (Erstwhile, Acit, Central Vs. Apartments, Old Prabhadevi Circle-45) Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400025. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu4560E .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

Unity Infrasporjects Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 3479/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3484 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2006-07) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3478 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2007-08) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3480 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2008-09) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3479 /Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2009-10) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3482/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3481/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 3483/Mum/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year:2012-13) बिधम/ M/S. Unity Infraprojects Ltd. Acit, Central Circle-8(2) 1252,Pushpanjali (Erstwhile, Acit, Central Vs. Apartments, Old Prabhadevi Circle-45) Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai- 400025. 400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacu4560E .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 12/07/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 20/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Company Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 48

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta (DR)
Section 10Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

M/S Raj Oil Mills Ltd., Mumbai vs. ACIT Central Circle-6(1), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed in limini

ITA 1227/MUM/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am 1. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1227/Mum/2019 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2008-09) 2. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1228/Mum/2019 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) 3. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1229/Mum/2019 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10) Acit Cen. Cir-6(1), M/S Raj Oil Mills Ltd. बनाम/ R. No. 1905, Air India 224-230, Bellasis Road, Building, Nariman Point, Vs. Alexandra Cinema Hall, Mumbai-400 021 Nagpada, Mumbai-400 008 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aaccr0266J (अपीलधथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : 4. आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 909/Mum/2019 (ननधधारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2008-09) M/S Raj Oil Mills Ltd. Acit Cen. Cir-6(1), R. No. 1905, Air India Building, बनाम/ 224-230, Bellasis Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Alexandra Cinema Hall, Vs. Nagpada, Mumbai-400 008 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aaccr0266J (अपीलधथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलधथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : None प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Jayant Jhaveri, Ld. Dr सुनवधईकीतधरीख/ : 04.07.2022 Date Of Hearing घोर्णधकीतधरीख / : 04.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Jayant Jhaveri, Ld. DR
Section 10Section 14Section 143(3)Section 178(6)Section 7

Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure, Mumbai vs. DCIT Circle-3(4), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed in limini

ITA 646/MUM/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jun 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Vp & Shri Amit Shukla, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 646 To 651/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2008-09 To 2013-14) Dcit Cen. Cir-3(4), Mahavir Roads & R. No. 1915, 19Th Floor, Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. बिधम/ Air India Building, Destination Builidng, 6Th Floor, Vs. Nariman Point, Mumbai- Above Mcdonal’S Restaurant, 400 021 Near Ghatkopar Chembur Flyover, Mumbai-400 071 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aaecm8166G (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Rohan Deshpande, Ld. Ar प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Ajay Chandra, Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 08.06.2022 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 08.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla: The Aforesaid Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Impugned Order Of Even Date 22.11.2018, Passed By Ld. Cit (Appeals)-51, Mumbai For The Quantum Appeal Of 2

For Appellant: Shri Rohan DeshpandeFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Chandra, Ld
Section 13Section 14Section 14(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 31Section 33Section 7