MAHAVIR ROADS & INFRASTRUCTURE,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-3(4), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that due to the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the IBC, no proceedings can be continued against the corporate debtor, including the present appeals. The appeals were therefore dismissed in limini.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed appeals before the ITAT. Subsequently, a petition was filed against the assessee under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, which was admitted by the NCLT, leading to a moratorium period.
What were the issues?
Whether income tax proceedings against a corporate debtor can continue during the moratorium period under the IBC. Whether the IBC has an overriding effect on the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VP & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM
O R D E R
Per Amit Shukla, Judicial Member:
The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate impugned order of even date 22.11.2018, passed by Ld. CIT (Appeals)-51, Mumbai for the quantum appeal of
Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that a petition under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been filed against the assessee company which has been admitted by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai (NCLT) vide order dated 21.02.2019 in Appeal CP (IB) 2300/NCLT/MB/2018. He also informed that process of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is still pending. A resolution professional has been appointed by NCLT, Mumbai and has granted his consent vide letter of authority dated 7th October 2021.
Ld. Counsel further submitted that now in view of section 14(1)(a) of IBC, there is a moratorium for institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, Tribunal, Arbitration Penal or other authority. Thus, during the moratorium period, no proceedings can be continued including the income tax proceedings before this Tribunal.
3 to 651/Mum/2019 Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
We find that the present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT (A) whereby demands have been created in respect of the additions sustained /enhanced by the Ld. CIT (A). Once NCLT has passed the order in pursuance of petition filed u/s 7 of IBC for initiating insolvency process against the corporate debtor, i.e., the assessee company and there is moratorium imposed u/s 14 of IBC, then all the proceedings stands in abeyance. The relevant portion of the order reads as under:- a) the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority; b) transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the corporate debtor any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial interest therein; c) any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the corporate debtor in respect of its property including any action under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002; d) the recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by or in possession of the corporate debtor.
4 to 651/Mum/2019 Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. It is further directed that: I. That the supply of essential goods or services to the corporate debtor, if continuing, shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during the moratorium period. II. That the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of IBC shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector Regulator. III. That the order of moratorium shall have effect from the date of this order till the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process, or until this Bench approves the resolution plan under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of IBC or passes an order for liquidation of corporate debtor tinder section 33 of IBC, as the case may be. IV. That the public announcement of the corporate insolvency resolution process, as specified under section 13 of I&B Code, should be made immediately. V. That this Bench at this moment appoints Mr Ankur Kumar, registration number IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00113/2017-18/10283, email id: ankur.srivastava@ezylaws.com, phone no. 9967011249 as Interim Resolution Professional to carry the functions as mentioned under IBC.
Thus, in view of the above, no proceedings can be initiated against the corporate debtor, that is, assessee company including 5 I.T.A. No. 646 to 651/Mum/2019 Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. the present proceedings before this tribunal, or the income tax proceedings and recovery of demand or giving effect of any order. It is well settled now that, IBC has overriding affect on all the acts including Income Tax Act which has been specifically provided u/s 178(6) of the I.T. Act as amended w.e.f. 01.11.2016.
Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee in the present circumstances, cannot be proceeded with, as revenue has also not sought any permission by the committee of creditors. Till the completion of moratorium period or upon the revival of corporate debtor as per the resolution plan approved by the adjudicating authority, the appeals filed by the assessee are treated as dismissed in limini. However, liberty is given to the parties to revive /restitute all the aforesaid appeals after the moratorium period expires or as approved by the adjudicating authority.
More judgments on Section 178(6)
- Gayatri Projects Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Circle 2(1), HyderabadITA 1752/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed11 Feb 2026AY 2022-23
- ITO, Ward-8(2), Kolkata vs M/S. Sarga Hotel Pvt. Ltd., KolkataITA 665/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Dec 2025AY 2014-15
- I.T.O, Ward-8(2), Kolkata vs M/S. Sarga Hotel Pvt. Ltd., Salt LakeITA 664/KOL/2023[2013-14]Status: Disposed31 Dec 2025AY 2013-14
- Gayatri Projects Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 1113/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed10 Dec 2025AY 2021-22
- Gayatri Projects Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 1112/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed10 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026