New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd.

138 Taxmann.com 73Supreme Court of India2022#4138 most cited

What is New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd. authority for?

The moratorium period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, will be excluded when calculating the limitation period for proceedings involving a corporate debtor. The Assessing Officer can seek re-institution of an appeal if the resolution process concludes.

28

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd. · section 60(6) IBC · moratorium period exclusion · limitation for corporate debtor · appeal restoration · insolvency proceedings · corporate debtor limitation · IBC · IT Act · Supreme Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd.

MCNALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 899/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Oct 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Ecospace, Campus 2B, 11F/12 Aayakar Bhavan, P-7, (Old Plot No. Aa Ii/Blk 3), Chowringhee Square, Vs New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata - 700069 North 24 Paragans, Kolkata - 7000156 (Pan: Aaccs5491A) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Abhishek Sureka, Ar Respondent By : Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit, Dr Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2024 O R D E R Per Rakesh Mishra: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Two Separate Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-I, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Ld. Cit”) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For Ays 2009-10 & 2013- 14, Dated 28.02.2018 & 13.03.2018 Respectively. Both The Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of Vide This Common Order For The Sake Of Brevity & Convenience. Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Limited.: Ays: 2009-10 & 2013-14 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are Reproduced As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Sureka, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, DR
Section 234CSection 250Section 37Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 McNally Sayaji Engineering Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Ecospace, Campus 2B, 11F/12 Aayakar Bhavan, P-7, (Old Plot No. AA II/Blk 3), Chowringhee Square, Vs New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata - 700069 North 24 Paragans, Kolkata - 7000156 (PAN: AACCS5491A) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Abhishek Sureka, AR Respondent by : Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, DR Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. CIT,…

MCNALLY SAYAJI ENGINEERING LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 1145/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Ecospace, Campus 2B, 11F/12 Aayakar Bhavan, P-7, (Old Plot No. Aa Ii/Blk 3), Chowringhee Square, Vs New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata - 700069 North 24 Paragans, Kolkata - 7000156 (Pan: Aaccs5491A) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Abhishek Sureka, Ar Respondent By : Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, Cit, Dr Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 08.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.10.2024 O R D E R Per Rakesh Mishra: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Two Separate Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata-I, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Ld. Cit”) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For Ays 2009-10 & 2013- 14, Dated 28.02.2018 & 13.03.2018 Respectively. Both The Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of Vide This Common Order For The Sake Of Brevity & Convenience. Mcnally Sayaji Engineering Limited.: Ays: 2009-10 & 2013-14 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are Reproduced As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Sureka, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, DR
Section 234CSection 250Section 37Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2013-14 McNally Sayaji Engineering Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Ecospace, Campus 2B, 11F/12 Aayakar Bhavan, P-7, (Old Plot No. AA II/Blk 3), Chowringhee Square, Vs New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata - 700069 North 24 Paragans, Kolkata - 7000156 (PAN: AACCS5491A) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Abhishek Sureka, AR Respondent by : Shri Rakesh Kumar Das, CIT, DR Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. CIT,…

VASAN HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT,CC-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue and Assessee are dismissed

ITA 266/CHNY/2021[2016-17]Status: FixedITAT Chennai28 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.260/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.261/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.262/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.263/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.264/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.265/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.266/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Vasan Health Care Private Ltd. Acit-Cc 2(1) बनाम Flat No.5, Ff, Door No.10/12 Chennai Anu Shanthi Apartment, 4Th Cross Street / Vs. Cit Colony, Mylapore, Chennai - 600004 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaccv-7028-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Vijay J. Reddy (Ca)-Ld. Ar ""थ" की ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri R. Mohan Reddy (Cit)- Ld. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2022

For Appellant: Shri Vijay J. Reddy (CA)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri R. Mohan Reddy (CIT)- Ld. DR
Section 14Section 178(6)Section 238Section 31

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "ाियक सद" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.260/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.261/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.262/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.263/Chny/2021 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.264/Chny/20…

Showing 120 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Ltd. (138 Taxmann.com 73) — Cited in 28 Judgments | BharatTax