Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.294

Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 294 (Procedure for block assessment) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 294 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 158BC is MDLR Resorts Private Limited v. CIT (40 Taxmann.com 365), cited in 14 of the 487 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 158BC

MDLR Resorts Private Limited v. CIT
40 Taxmann.com 365 · 2013 · High Court
14
citing judgments

A search is held to be valid when conducted under similar facts and circumstances, as decided by the Delhi High Court.

Pranav Construction Co. v. ACIT
96 Taxmann 323 · 1998 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Only the profit element embedded in 'on money' receipts, or a reasonable percentage of such 'on money', can be taxed. This principle applies even when expenditure is incurred outside the books of accounts, as evidenced by seized papers.

CIT v. Rakesh Kumar
313 ITR 305 · 2009 · High Court
11
citing judgments

A notice issued under section 153A of the Income Tax Act to a non-existing or deceased person is invalid in law.

Proman Ltd. v. DCIT
95 ITD 489 · 2005 · ITAT
11
citing judgments

An Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) cannot adjudicate on the validity of a search conducted under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when disposing of an appeal against a block assessment.

375 (SC); Mrs. Vanitha Gopal Shetty v. ACIT
444 ITR 420 · 2022 · High Court
7
citing judgments
CIT v. C Najeeb
130 Taxmann.com 142 · 2021 · Reported
6
citing judgments
Principal Commissioner of Income–tax v. Chawla Interbild Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd.
412 ITR 152 · 2019 · High Court
6
citing judgments
CIT v. G.K. Sanniappan
298 ITR 274 · 2008 · High Court
5
citing judgments
CIT v. Bipinchandra Chimanlal Doshi
395 ITR 632 · 2017 · Reported
5
citing judgments
Act. Again in Mansukhlal & Bros. v. CIT
73 ITR 546 · 1969 · Supreme Court
4
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 158BC

Rupee Soren L/H of Shibu Soren, New Delhi vs. ACIT Central Circle 6, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITSSA 100/DEL/1997[01/04/1986 to 26/04/1996]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2026

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Hon’Bleit(Ss) A No. 100/Del/1997 Block Period : 1.04.1986 To 26.04.1996 Shibu Soren Through Vs. Acit, Cc-6, New Delhi Rupee Soren Legal Heir Of Shibu Soren) Vill-Nemra Po Barlanga Ps Barlanga Jharkhand-829110 (Pan: Asnps4286P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Salil Agarwal, Sr. Adv., Shri Shailesh Gupta, Ca, Shri Uma Shankar, Adv & Shri Madhur Agarwal, Adv. (Vc) Respondent By : Shri K. Hauthang, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 17.08.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21.08.2026 Order Per Mahavir Singh: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Block Assessment Order Framed By The Acit, Cc-6, Delhi For The Block Period 1.4.1986 To 26.4.1996 U/S. 158Bc Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred As Act) Vide His Order Dated 29.4.1997. 2. The First Issue In This Appeal Of The Assessee Is As Regards To Assumption Of Jurisdiction For Farming Of Assessment U/S. 158Bc Without Issuing Notice U/S. 143(2) Of The Act After Filing Of Return Of Income For The Block Period In Terms Of Notice U/S. 158Bc Of The Act. For This Assessee Has Raised The Ground No. 2 Vide Concise Grounds Of Appeal, Which Reads As Under:- “2. That The Impugned Assessment Farmed By The Learned Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, Is Without Jurisdiction As No Notice U/S. 143(2) Of The Income Tax Act, Was Issued & Served After Assessee Had Filed Its Return Of Undisclosed Income In Pursuance To Notice Issued U/S. 158Bc Of The Act.”

For Appellant: Shri Salil Agarwal, Sr. Adv., Shri Shailesh GuptaFor Respondent: Shri K. Hauthang, CIT(DR)
Section 127Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 158Section 158B

Sonaj and Company, Solapur vs. DCIT Cirlcle 2(2), Solapur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITSSA 30/PUN/2025[2001-01]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 May 2026AY 2001-01

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraitssa No.30/Pun/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2000-01 Sonaj & Company, Dcit, Circle – 2(2), Solapur P.O. No. 11, Indapur, Road, Akluj-413101 Vs. Pan : Aasfs9837R अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Shri Nikhil S Pathak Department By : Shri Amit Bobde Date Of Hearing : 24-02-2026 Date Of 06-05-2026 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order Per Astha Chandra, Jm : The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30.07.2025 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune-11 (“Cit(A)”) Pertaining To Assessment Year (“Ay”) 1990-91. 2. The Brief Fact Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Partnership Firm Engaged In The Business Of Dealing In Petroleum Product, Hero Honda Motorcycle Spare Parts & Other Commodities. A Search & Seizure Action U/S 132 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The “Act”) Was Conducted In The Case Of The Assessee On 21.07.1999. Subsequent To The Search Action, Notice U/S 158Bc Of The Act Was Issued To The Assessee On 15.10.1999 Requesting It To Furnish Return Of Income For The Block Period 1990-1991 To 1999-2000 & For Part Period Of Ay 2000-01. In Response Thereto, The Assessee Filed Its Return For The Aforesaid Block Period (“Block Return”) On 16.12.1999 Declaring Total Undisclosed Income At Rs.1,92,000/-. Thereafter, The Ld. Assessing Officer (“Ao”) Issued Notice U/S 143(2) Of The Act On 27.04.2001. The Ld. Ao Completed The Block Assessment Vide His Order Passed U/S 158Bc Of The Act Dated 30.07.2001 Determining Total Undisclosed Income For The Block Period At Rs.19,77,401/- Comprising Of Addition(S) Made On Account Of – (I) Household Expenses Noted In The Seized

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 132Section 142Section 143Section 143(2)Section 144Section 145Section 153BSection 158B

Rekha Gupta, Motihari vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Muzaffarpur

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 81/PAT/2025[1991-92]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Jan 2026AY 1991-92

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.81/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 1991-92 Rekha Gupta………..………….………………. …………………....Appellant Balua Tal, Motihari, East Champaran, Bihar-845401. [Pan: Adkpg6602P] Vs. Acit, Cc, Muzaffarpur………...……………..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Abhi Sarkar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. A H Chowdhury, Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 05, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 09, 2026 आदेश / Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 24.12.2024 Passed By The Nfac, Delhi U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The ‘Act’) For The Assessment Year 1991-92. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual Deriving Income From Business & Other Sources. During The Relevant Period, The Assessee Was Engaged In The Business Of Sale Of Liquor On Wholesale & Retail Basis In The Proprietary Concern Styled As M/S Surya Enterprises. A Search & Seizure Operation Under Section 132(1) Of The Act Was Conducted At The Business Premises As Well As The Residential Premises Of The Assessee. Pursuant Thereto, An Assessment

Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 158BSection 250