MOHAMMED USMAN, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1), BHILAI, DURG

ITA 180/RPR/2026Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 March 2026AY 2011-12Bench: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY (Judicial Member)17 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the issuance of notice under Section 143(2) is mandatory for assessments framed under Section 143(3) and 147. The absence of such a notice renders the assessment invalid and void ab initio.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was filed 58 days late. The primary legal contention was that the notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was not issued for the assessment completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147.

What were the issues?

Whether an assessment framed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 is valid without the issuance of a mandatory notice under Section 143(2) to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(2),Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR

Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, CA
For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Hearing: 17.03.2026Pronounced: 17.03.2026

PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 17.10.2025 for the assessment year 2011-12 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2.

At the very outset, it is noted that the appeal is time barred by 58 days. That explaining the reasons for such delay, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has filed condonation petition a/w. affidavit 27.02.2026. For the sake of completeness, the relevant co

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →