V RAMAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE III(4) , CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the loss suffered by the assessee from investment in companies should be considered as a capital loss, reversing the capital gains computation. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Managing Director, had income from salary, dividends, and sitting fees. A search action led to the issuance of a block assessment notice. The Assessing Officer treated certain commission and dividend income as undisclosed income.
What were the issues?
Whether commission and dividend income should be treated as undisclosed income, and whether losses from company investments should be treated as capital loss against capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 158BC,Section 15,Section 17,Section 45,Section 55,Section 70,Section 74
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon623 citing321 ITR 362 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT621 citing227 ITR 172 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Sitaldas Tirathdas146 citing41 ITR 367 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Imperial Chemical Industries (I) Pvt Ltd.53 citing74 ITR 17 · 1969 · SC
- CIT v. Ravi Kant Jain34 citing250 ITR 141 · 2001 · HC
- CIT v. Attili N. Rao28 citing252 ITR 880 · 2001 · SC
- CIT v. Smt.Thressiamma Abraham17 citing227 ITR 802 · 1997 · HC
- CIT 126 Taxman 544 (Bom) Dalmia Jain & Co. vs. CIT (1971) 81 ITR 754 (SC) Avery India Ltd. v. CIT15 citing86 ITR 38 · 1972 · SC
- CIT v. Vinod Danchand Ghodawat14 citing247 ITR 448 · 2001 · HC
- S.P. Shrivastava & Sons. v. CIT8 citing240 ITR 552 · 1990 · HC
- Imperial Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. (1969) 74 ITR 17 (SC) M.K. Brother Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, Kanpur5 citing125 ITR 102 · 1980 · HC
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. J.K. Narayanan3 citing293 ITR 179 · 2007
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
"ी मनु कुमार "ग"र, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद"य के सम$ BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.:744 & 2197/Chny/2005 "नधा%रण वष% / Assessment Years: 2000-01 & 1999 -2000
V. Ramakrishnan, The DCIT, 41, (Old No.49), vs. Central Circle – III(4), 5th Cross Street, Trustpuram, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. [PAN: AAAPR-3927-K] (अपीलाथ'/Appellant) (()यथ'/Respondent)
IT(SS)A No.:162/Chny/2003 Block Period: 1989-90 to 1999-2000
V. Ramakrishnan, The DCIT, 41, (Old No.49), vs. Central Circle – III(4), 5th Cross Street, Trustpuram, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. [PAN: AAAPR-3927-K] (अपीलाथ'/Appellant) (()यथ'/Respondent)
IT(SS)A No.:153/Chny/2003 Block Period: 1989-90 to 1999-2000
The DCIT, V. Ramakrishnan, Central Circle – III(4), vs. 41, (Old No.49), 5th Cross Street, Trustpuram, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. [PAN: AAAPR-3927-K] (अपीलाथ'/Appellant) (()यथ'/Respondent)
:-2-: IT(SS)A Nos. 153 & 162/Chny/2003 & ITA. Nos:744 & 2197/Chny/2005
Assessee by : Shri. N. Arjun Raj
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026