Section 156 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.289

Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 289 (Notice of demand) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 289 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 156 is Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI (73 Taxmann.com 252), cited in 1,778 of the 694 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 156

Fatehraj Singhvi v. UOI
73 Taxmann.com 252 · 2016 · High Court
1,778
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E are not applicable for periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the amendment to section 200A inserting clause (c) was effective from that date.

Kourani v. Union OF India
83 Taxmann.com 137 · 2017 · High Court
1,708
citing judgments

The fee under Section 234E for late filing of TDS/TCS statements cannot be levied retrospectively by processing an intimation under Section 200A for defaults occurring before the amendment allowing such processing.

Fateh Raj Singhvi & Ors. v. UOI
289 CTR 602 · 2016 · High Court
844
citing judgments

A fee under Section 234E cannot be levied or adjusted in an intimation under Section 200A for TDS statements pertaining to periods prior to June 1, 2015, as the enabling amendment to Section 200A(1)(c) came into effect only from that date.

Rashmikant Kundalia v. Union of India
54 Taxmann.com 200 · 2015 · High Court
702
citing judgments

Section 234E, levying late fees for delayed filing of TDS statements under section 200(3), is constitutionally valid and constitutes a compensatory fee, not a punitive penalty. Before treating any person as an assessee-in-default, an opportunity of being heard must be provided.

Gajanan Constructions v. DCIT
74 Taxmann.com 6 · 2016 · ITAT
465
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E can only be levied prospectively from June 1, 2015. Levying late fees for periods prior to this date is not permissible.

Akhil Bhartiya Prathmik Shikshak Sangh Bhawan Trust v. ADIT
115 TTJ 419 · 2008 · ITAT
292
citing judgments

Penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice issued under Section 142(1) is not leviable when the assessee demonstrates a reasonable cause for such non-compliance. The decision defines what constitutes 'reasonable cause' in this context.

247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v. Nestle India Ltd.
140 ITR 832 · 1983 · High Court
172
citing judgments

An employer is not in default under section 201 if they have made a bona fide estimate of employee income and deducted tax at source based on that estimate.

Setty & Others vs. State of Karnataka (7) (1996) 1 SCC 345- Secretary Government of Madras v. P.R. Sriramulu
4 SCC 720 · 2008 · Reported
145
citing judgments

The validity of Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted by the Finance Act, 2012, is examined by the court.

Rajesh Kourani v. Union of India
297 CTR 502 · 2017 · High Court
97
citing judgments

Section 234E creates a substantive liability to pay late fees for failure to deliver statements under section 200(3) within the prescribed time, effective from July 1, 2012, independent of the recovery mechanism under section 200A(1)(c).

Velu Palandar v. DCIT
83 ITR 683 · 1972 · High Court
94
citing judgments

The opportunity of hearing provided to an assessee must be real, effective, and realistic, not merely notional, and tax authorities are incumbent to decide cases on their merits after affording due opportunity.

Judgments on Section 156

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Cir.-2, Surat vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat

ITA 176/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./It(Ss)A No. 38/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sumeet Industries Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Central Circle-2, 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Surat. Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Assessee) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B आयकर अपील सं./It(Ss)A No. 46/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2012-13) The Dcit, Central Cirlce-2, Vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat. 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Revenue)/(Assessee) (Assessee)/(Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B आयकर अपील सं./It(Ss)A No. 47/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2014-15) The Dcit, Central Cirlce-2, Vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat. 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Revenue)/(Assessee) (Assessee)/(Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 120/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2015-16) The Dcit, Central Cirlce-2, Vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat. 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Revenue)/(Assessee) (Assessee)/(Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B

Section 143(3)Section 156ASection 31Section 31(1)Section 61

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Cir.-2, Surat vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat

ITA 120/SRT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./It(Ss)A No. 38/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sumeet Industries Ltd., Vs. The Dcit, Central Circle-2, 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Surat. Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Assessee) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B आयकर अपील सं./It(Ss)A No. 46/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2012-13) The Dcit, Central Cirlce-2, Vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat. 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Revenue)/(Assessee) (Assessee)/(Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B आयकर अपील सं./It(Ss)A No. 47/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2014-15) The Dcit, Central Cirlce-2, Vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat. 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Revenue)/(Assessee) (Assessee)/(Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 120/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2015-16) The Dcit, Central Cirlce-2, Vs. Sumeet Industries Ltd., Surat. 504, Trividh Chambers, Opp. Fire Station, Ring Road, Surat-395002. (Revenue)/(Assessee) (Assessee)/(Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaecs2583B

Section 143(3)Section 156ASection 31Section 31(1)Section 61

S.A.Imamudeen, Kanchipuram vs. ITO Ward-2, Kanchipuram

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 596/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.596/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri S.A. Imamudeen, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 10B, Sengaluneerodai Street, Ward 2, Kanchipuram. Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu 631 502. [Pan:Abhpi2997N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri T. Vasudevan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.01.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.01.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 7, Chennai Dated 07.03.2020 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That On Verification Of The Itd Application, The Assessing Officer Has Noted From Air Information That The Assessee Has Deposited Cash To The Tune Of ₹.15,08,200/- During The Financial Year 2010-11, But, The Assessee Has Not Filed Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2011-12. To Verify The Genuineness Of The Transaction

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 271(1)(b)