Section 148(1) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.280

Section 148(1) falls under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 280 (Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 280 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 148(1) is Dr. Shashi Kant Garg v. CIT (285 ITR 158), cited in 42 of the 38 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 148(1)

Dr. Shashi Kant Garg v. CIT
285 ITR 158 · 2006 · High Court
42
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings initiated by a notice under Section 148 are invalid if the requisite sanction or approval under Section 151 is not obtained from the proper competent authority. This fundamental defect is substantive and cannot be cured.

Pannabai v. CIT
170 ITR 80 · 1988 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Failure to serve a valid notice under Section 148 renders reassessment proceedings void and without jurisdiction. The issuance and proper service of such a notice are fundamental prerequisites for the Assessing Officer's authority to reassess income.

Cit v. Independent Mdia (P) Ltd.
210 Taxmann 14 · 2012 · High Court
19
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer (AO) is not required to prove that share money originated from the assessee's own funds; Section 68 of the Income Tax Act does not place such a burden on the AO.

R.K. Upadhyaya v. Shanabhai P. Patel
253 ITR 334 · 2002 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Service of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is mandatory and a condition precedent for initiating reassessment proceedings. Failure to serve the notice renders the reassessment proceedings a nullity, and this defect cannot be cured by the assessee's appearance in response to a notice under Section 142(1).

CIT v. Jagdish Prasad\nChoudhary
211 ITR 472 · 1995 · High Court
9
citing judgments
CIT v. Avtar Singh
304 ITR 333 · 2008 · High Court
6
citing judgments
CIT vs. Chetan Gupta (2015) 126 DTR 401 (Del.), CIT v. Mani Kakar 18 DTR (Del) 145 and Smt. S. Nachiar vs. ITO
326 ITR 77 · 2010 · High Court
6
citing judgments
CIT v. Laxmi Narain
168 Taxmann 128 · 2008 · High Court
4
citing judgments
Harjeet Surajprakash Girotra v. Union of India
108 Taxmann.com 491 · 2019 · High Court
3
citing judgments
Commodities (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
154 Taxmann.com 292 · 2023 · High Court
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 148(1)