BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

38 results for “capital gains”+ Section 143clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,146Delhi4,047Bangalore1,500Kolkata1,475Chennai1,295Ahmedabad1,260Jaipur918Hyderabad773Pune533Indore474Surat444Chandigarh358Visakhapatnam291Cochin287Karnataka247Raipur210Rajkot209Nagpur179Amritsar136Lucknow123Agra121Guwahati97Panaji88Calcutta82Dehradun78Ranchi61Cuttack57Jodhpur55Patna54Jabalpur52SC38Telangana38Allahabad30Varanasi22Kerala12Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana5Orissa5Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 26036Section 260A24Section 143(3)13Deduction10Disallowance10Addition to Income8Section 1437Section 234B7Section 10B7Capital Gains

M/S UNICORN AGRO TECH LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD. vs. THE ASST. COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the

ITTA/48/2009HC Telangana16 Mar 2021

Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 143(3)Section 260A

Section 143(3) of the Act by order dated December 31, 2007 accepted the long term capital gains which arose

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sri Anand Prakash Sanghi

ITTA/33/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: M/S.HARBOUR VIEWFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Showing 1–20 of 38 · Page 1 of 2

7
Section 2636
Section 80H6
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 2(47)(v)Section 260ASection 269USection 53A

Section 143(2) and assessment completed making an addition of Rs.1,87,00,000/- as being concealed income under 'short-term capital gain

The Commissioner of Income Tax - III, vs. M/s. Suven Pharmaceuticals Limited,

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/677/2006HC Telangana21 Mar 2012
Section 115JSection 143Section 208Section 260A

143 or] on the basis of the regular  assessment aforesaid. (4) Where,   as   a   result   of   an   order   under  section 154 or section 155 or section 250 or  section 254 or section 260 or section 262 or  section 263 or section 264 or an order of the  Settlement Commission under sub­section (4)  of section 245D, the amount on which interest

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s Pokarna Limited

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/273/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260A

143(2) dated 25.07.2006, which was duly served on the assessee Company. The - - 8 assessee in response to the notice issued appeared on 13.12.2007 and 14.12.2007 and filed written submissions. The assessee claimed that they are in the business of providing comprehensive facilities to IT Industry. Such facilities include provision for specially furnished buildings, special electrical connections, and special arrangement

The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central) vs. M/s.Madhu Enterprises

ITTA/127/2025HC Telangana12 Feb 2025

Bench: The Learned

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 260ASection 54F

143(3) of the Act restricting the deduction under Section 54F to ₹30 crores, as against ₹90 crores claimed by the Assessee. 7. The Assessee had deposited the consideration in the capital gains

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Srimantha Granites

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/298/2015HC Telangana05 Nov 2015

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260

Section 143(3) of the Act and 1 Assessment Year I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 10 added taxes against each assessee, as shown herein below, on the ground that the lands sold by them are capital assets and the capital gains

The Commissioner of Income Tax- I vs. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/176/2015HC Telangana08 Oct 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 260

Section 143(3) of the Act and 1 Assessment Year I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 10 added taxes against each assessee, as shown herein below, on the ground that the lands sold by them are capital assets and the capital gains

The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, vs. Derco Cooling Coils Ltd,

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/175/2015HC Telangana08 Oct 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 260

Section 143(3) of the Act and 1 Assessment Year I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 10 added taxes against each assessee, as shown herein below, on the ground that the lands sold by them are capital assets and the capital gains

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s Matrix Power Pvt Ltd.,

ITTA/386/2013HC Telangana03 Sept 2013
Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 260A

143(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings, noticed that: (i) The Assessee had a hundred per-cent export oriented undertaking (100% EOU) at Plot No.A-280 to 283, RIICO Industrial Area, Chopanki, Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan); was registered as EOU in Noida Special Economic Zone and eligible for deduction under Section 10B of the Act. This

Commissioner of Incoem Tax- 2, vs. M/s. Erythor Pharma Pvt. Ltd.,

In the result, the impugned order dated

ITTA/281/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143(1)Section 260

capital gains in the returns filed over a period of years, subsequently can they refuse to accept the said valuation as the basis, for the subsequent years? 3 3. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal briefly stated are that the appellant had filed return of income on 04.01.2007 which was processed under Section 143

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. A.V. V. VARAPRASAD

ITTA/742/2017HC Telangana29 Nov 2017

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,T.AMARNATH GOUD

For Appellant: Mr. K.Raji Reddy
Section 143Section 2Section 263

capital gains under Sections 54EC and 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961,(for short ‘the Act’). The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. A notice under Section 143

The Commissioner of Income tax vs. M/s. ragamayee bAr AND Restaurant,

The appeals stand dismissed

ITTA/203/2010HC Telangana30 Nov 2010

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 132BSection 234BSection 234D

capital gains; or (b) income of the nature referred to in sub-clause (ix) of clause (24) of section 2, (c) income under the had “Profits and gains of business or profession” in case where the income accrues or arises under the said head for the first time, and the assessee has paid the whole of the amount

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Supriya Wines

ITTA/591/2017HC Telangana07 Nov 2017

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Section 131Section 132(1)Section 276Section 276C(1)

143(3) more so when the assessing officer cancelled the penalty levied. 26. In our view, once the finding of concealment and subsequent levy of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been struck down by the Tribunal, the assessing officer has no other alternative except to correct his order under Section

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions0 vs. Kalinga Cultural Trust

In the result, we do not find any

ITTA/580/2016HC Telangana28 Nov 2016

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

143(3) of the Act based on the survey 8 and other enquiries, the Assessing Officer disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B of the Act. 5. The Assessing Officer inter alia held that assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 10B of the Act only after verification and the contention of the assessee that old machinery

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs. M/s. VBC Industries Limited

In the result, we do not find any

ITTA/559/2015HC Telangana16 Feb 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

143(3) of the Act based on the survey 8 and other enquiries, the Assessing Officer disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B of the Act. 5. The Assessing Officer inter alia held that assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 10B of the Act only after verification and the contention of the assessee that old machinery

The Commissioner of Income Tax III, vs. M/s. Swagath Seeds Private Limited

ITTA/346/2010HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 2(14)Section 260Section 64(1)(IV)

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. An order of assessment was passed on 17.03.2005. The Assessing Authority passed an order of assessment by making certain additions such as income from joint development of sites, long term capital gains

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S K.VENKATESWARA RAO

ITTA/188/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80H

143(3) after making various additions and disallowances. Being aggrieved by the additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, the apepllant preferred first appeal before the learned CIT(Appeals) who granted partial relief to the appellant. 2.1 Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Page 2 of 14 O/TAXAP/186/2003 JUDGMENT CIT(A) the appellant as well

Sampathirao Apparao vs. Income Tax Officer,

The appeals stand dismissed

ITTA/20/2012HC Telangana19 Jul 2013
Section 132(4)Section 132BSection 140ASection 153ASection 234BSection 260

capital gain arising out of sale proceeds of house, thus, Assessing Officer requested Commissioner of Income Tax for adjustment of seized amount towards the tax liability of appellants. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar vide letter dated 26.06.2009 permitted Assessing Officer to adjust seized cash against tax liability of appellants. The Assessing Officer, accordingly, adjusted seized cash against

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Laila Impex,

Accordingly answered against the Revenue. The appeals fail and are dismissed, without

ITTA/473/2012HC Telangana09 Jul 2013
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 260ASection 9(1)(vi)

143(3) r/w 144C applied Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act to tax the income of the assessee as royalty. 6. The assessees in the present cases both derive income from the “lease of transponders” of their respective satellites. This lease is for the object of relaying signals of their customers; both resident and non-resident TV channels that

The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. G Pulla Reddy Chritable Trust

In the result, the orders passed by the Commissioner of

ITTA/192/2015HC Telangana08 Oct 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 143(2)Section 154Section 260Section 260ASection 263Section 50CSection 80C

capital gains at Rs.19,06,984/- and declared income from other sources at Rs.1,55,438/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and a notice under Section 143