BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “capital gains”+ Long Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,769Delhi3,778Chennai1,706Bangalore1,482Kolkata1,447Ahmedabad1,098Jaipur869Hyderabad754Pune572Surat399Indore351Chandigarh309Karnataka284Cochin247Visakhapatnam230Raipur185Nagpur173Rajkot122Lucknow120Calcutta119Cuttack108Amritsar96Agra93Guwahati92Patna74Telangana64Panaji61Ranchi56Jodhpur45SC42Dehradun34Jabalpur33Varanasi18Allahabad16Rajasthan8Kerala8Punjab & Haryana6Orissa4Himachal Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Andhra Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 260A34Section 26029Capital Gains18Long Term Capital Gains14Deduction13Exemption12Section 54F10Section 10(20)10Addition to Income10Business Income

M/S UNICORN AGRO TECH LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD. vs. THE ASST. COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the

ITTA/48/2009HC Telangana16 Mar 2021

Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 143(3)Section 260A

long term capital gains and also short term capital gains; the fund deployed in ITA NO. 48 OF 2009 REPORTABLE

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMEE TAX-III vs. M/S.V.B.C.FERRO ALLOYS LTD

THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED

ITTA/506/2006HC Telangana15 Oct 2024

Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

9
Section 80P(2)(a)8
Section 271(1)(c)7
For Appellant: Sri J.V. prasad (Sr. SC FOR TNCOME TAX)For Respondent: Sri Challa Gunaranjan
Section 1Section 1OSection 260

capital gain '"vas Rs.31,56,8O,000/-. After indexation, lhe long-term capital gain arrived at Rs.31

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, HYD vs. M/S. SUJANA METALS LTD, HYD

ITTA/549/2011HC Telangana21 Apr 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260Section 28

Long Term Capital Gains @ ` 3,80,02,500/-. Moreover, AO observed that this income should be made taxable

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Supriya Wines

ITTA/591/2017HC Telangana07 Nov 2017

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Section 131Section 132(1)Section 276Section 276C(1)

Long Term Capital Gain during the Financial Year 2013-14 relevant to Assessment Year 2014- 15 and during

The Commissioner of Income Tax III, vs. M/s. Swagath Seeds Private Limited

ITTA/346/2010HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 2(14)Section 260Section 64(1)(IV)

long term capital gain made by assessing authority relating to Rs.2,94,26,600/- as long term capital

Sri Damodarlal Badruka vs. The Income Tax Officer

The appeal is allowed but in the circumstances with

ITTA/299/2003HC Telangana17 Mar 2015

Bench: A RAMALINGESWARA RAO,DILIP B. BHOSALE

Section 45Section 54

long term capital gain in terms of Section 54 F (3) of the Act. It is not in dispute

Sri Natakari Gopal vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and 2 Others

ITTA/238/2022HC Telangana18 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 3Rd January, 2023. Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mita, Adv. ..For Appellant Mr. Pranit Bag , Adv. Mr. A. K. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Debdatta Saha, Adv. …For Respondent Re: Ga/1/2022 The Court:- Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Advocate For The Appellant & Mr. Pranit Bag, Learned Advocate For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 1126 Days In Filing The Appeal. Though The Reasons Given In The Affidavit Are Not Convincing The Issues Involved In The Appeal Had Been Decided By This Court In Earlier Matters, This Court Exercises Discretion & Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed.

Section 10Section 10(38)Section 260A

Long Term Capital gain of Rs.1,12,13,010/- and claim the same as exempted from income tax u/s 10(38) of the Income

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Nara Constructions,

ITTA/672/2017HC Telangana15 Nov 2017

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)Section 28Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viii)

long-term finance (computed under the head “Profits and gain of business or profession” before making any deduction under this clause) carried to such reserve account: [***] Provided [***]that where the aggregate of the amounts carried to such reserve account from time to time exceeds twice the amount of the paid up share capital

M/S.R.S.RANGADAS vs. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are disposed of, with no order as to costs

ITTA/406/2005HC Telangana19 Oct 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 2(47)Section 271(1)(c)Section 45(1)Section 48Section 54F

long term capital gain‟ the assessee had disclosed transfer consideration of Rs.5 Crores on sale of one lakh

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sri Anand Prakash Sanghi

ITTA/33/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: M/S.HARBOUR VIEWFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 2(47)(v)Section 260ASection 269USection 53A

Long term capital gain was also assessed. According to the assessee therein, the possession of the land was handed

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/S Gulf Oil Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,

ITTA/195/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

gains,  accrued   by   sales   of   relevant   shares,   is  irrelevant for deciding the allowability or  otherwise of loss shown by the assessee on  alleged sale of these shares, as sales have  not   been   conclusively   established   by   the  assessee. 26.   In   view   of   above   discussion,   we   hold  that   as   assessee   could   not   establish   the  factum   of   sales   made   to   his/her   associate

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s.Jayalakshmi Chits

ITTA/211/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

gains,  accrued   by   sales   of   relevant   shares,   is  irrelevant for deciding the allowability or  otherwise of loss shown by the assessee on  alleged sale of these shares, as sales have  not   been   conclusively   established   by   the  assessee. 26.   In   view   of   above   discussion,   we   hold  that   as   assessee   could   not   establish   the  factum   of   sales   made   to   his/her   associate

The Commissioner of Income Tax - VI vs. M/s. Manikanta Iron AND Hardware

ITTA/196/2008HC Telangana02 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

gains,  accrued   by   sales   of   relevant   shares,   is  irrelevant for deciding the allowability or  otherwise of loss shown by the assessee on  alleged sale of these shares, as sales have  not   been   conclusively   established   by   the  assessee. 26.   In   view   of   above   discussion,   we   hold  that   as   assessee   could   not   establish   the  factum   of   sales   made   to   his/her   associate

PRL COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

In the result, this Cr.M.P

ITTA/590/2017HC Telangana23 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 271(1)(c)Section 276Section 482

Long Term Capital Gain during the Financial Year 2013-14 relevant to Assessment Year 2014-15; and the allegation

Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry vs. M/s. Kakinada Coop. Town Bank LTd., Kakinada

ITTA/485/2012HC Telangana15 Nov 2012

Bench: The Court Is: “Whether, The Shares Invested Through A Portfolio Management

Section 271(1)(c)Section 88E

gains were taxable as business income, the exemption of section 10(38) for long term capital gains

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indus Business System Ltd.

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/409/2017HC Telangana08 Nov 2017

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Section 260

Long Term Capital gains tax on sale of the STPL. 5. In the case of Smt. Poornima Shailendra

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S New Asian Bar AND Restaurant,

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/410/2017HC Telangana10 Jul 2017

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

Section 260

Long Term Capital gains tax on sale of the STPL. 5. In the case of Smt. Poornima Shailendra

K.V.D.PRASAD RAO vs. THE JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITTA/57/2002HC Telangana07 Sept 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant: M. SRIDHARFor Respondent: MS. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY Sr. S.C. for l.T
Section 260

long tcnn capital gains. FIe funher held that nott-ithsurnding tlic lock-irrperiod and the pledge of shares, those mtst br' regaftlcd ls li.rving been sold or trarsferred within the rreaning of Section 2('17) of rlre Act as the entire consideration 5 \\?s rtccived by the xsessee and the co-promoters r'r,ith share certiliciltes Lrruig

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. V.Ramachandra Rao

In the result, we do not find any merit in the

ITTA/204/2015HC Telangana22 Sept 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 260Section 260ASection 48Section 5Section 54E

long term capital gain on sale of shares of Rs.26,07,28,826/-. The sale of shares of Trident

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, vs. Sri Prem Chand

ITTA/380/2006HC Telangana02 Feb 2012
Section 4

long term capital gain and therefore, relief has been given to him in respect of paying income tax on the long