BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

122 results for “capital gains”

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9,557Delhi6,955Chennai3,206Bangalore2,912Kolkata2,429Ahmedabad2,016Pune1,426Hyderabad1,408Jaipur1,388Surat777Chandigarh731Indore651Karnataka516Cochin483Visakhapatnam465Raipur324Nagpur317Rajkot278Agra222Amritsar211Cuttack208Lucknow193Calcutta151Panaji128Patna127Guwahati127Telangana122Ranchi107Dehradun106SC106Jodhpur92Jabalpur80Allahabad37Varanasi26Kerala23Rajasthan12Punjab & Haryana12Orissa10A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 26069Section 260A44Capital Gains27Section 8025Deduction25Addition to Income24Disallowance16Section 10B13Long Term Capital Gains

M/S UNICORN AGRO TECH LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD. vs. THE ASST. COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the

ITTA/48/2009HC Telangana16 Mar 2021

Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 143(3)Section 260A

capital gains on investments and accounts of remittance to India for investment in India and realizing capital gains on investment

M/S. VJIL CONSULTING LTD., vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), HYDERABAD

Appeal is allowed

ITTA/53/2009HC Telangana31 Jul 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,S.CHALAPATHI RAO

Section 115J

Showing 1–20 of 122 · Page 1 of 7

13
Section 143(3)12
Exemption11
Section 54F10
Section 260

capital gains are directly taken to capital reserve without taking the said amount of capital gain to the profit and loss

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMEE TAX-III vs. M/S.V.B.C.FERRO ALLOYS LTD

THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED

ITTA/506/2006HC Telangana15 Oct 2024

Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

For Appellant: Sri J.V. prasad (Sr. SC FOR TNCOME TAX)For Respondent: Sri Challa Gunaranjan
Section 1Section 1OSection 260

capital gain '"vas Rs.31,56,8O,000/-. After indexation, lhe long-term capital gain arrived at Rs.31,43,80,590/ . The respondent

M/S.R.S.RANGADAS vs. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are disposed of, with no order as to costs

ITTA/406/2005HC Telangana19 Oct 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 2(47)Section 271(1)(c)Section 45(1)Section 48Section 54F

capital gains on the basis that the assessee might have gained or could have gained a higher price which in fact

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, HYD vs. M/S. SUJANA METALS LTD, HYD

ITTA/549/2011HC Telangana21 Apr 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260Section 28

capital asset and the gain therefrom would be computed as capital gain. In the present case, following facts are not in dispute

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 5 vs. M/s Vijay Textiles Limited

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/541/2015HC Telangana16 Feb 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 167BSection 2(31)Section 2(47)Section 260Section 3Section 4Section 67A

capital asset. (4) The profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset by way of distribution of capital

K.V.D.PRASAD RAO vs. THE JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITTA/57/2002HC Telangana07 Sept 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant: M. SRIDHARFor Respondent: MS. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY Sr. S.C. for l.T
Section 260

gains u-x l-iabilitr. n is held that capital gains tari c.rn be levied for p,.rn perl ormance

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s Pokarna Limited

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/273/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260A

Capital Gain at Rs.6,34,26,274/- and levied Capital Tax on the said amount. 6. Aggrieved by this order

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sri Anand Prakash Sanghi

ITTA/33/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: M/S.HARBOUR VIEWFor Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 2(47)(v)Section 260ASection 269USection 53A

capital gain on account of transfer. The AO estimated the capital gains at Rs.1.87 crores and subjected the same to tax. The assessment

Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry vs. M/s. Kakinada Coop. Town Bank LTd., Kakinada

ITTA/485/2012HC Telangana15 Nov 2012

Bench: The Court Is: “Whether, The Shares Invested Through A Portfolio Management

Section 271(1)(c)Section 88E

gains taxable as capital gains or as business income?” 2. The facts are that the Appellant (hereafter “assessee”), is a partnership

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/S Gulf Oil Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,

ITTA/195/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Capital gains. “45.  (1)  Any profits   or gains  arising  from  the  transfer   of   a   capital   asset   effected   in   the  previous

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s.Jayalakshmi Chits

ITTA/211/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Capital gains. “45.  (1)  Any profits   or gains  arising  from  the  transfer   of   a   capital   asset   effected   in   the  previous

The Commissioner of Income Tax - VI vs. M/s. Manikanta Iron AND Hardware

ITTA/196/2008HC Telangana02 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Capital gains. “45.  (1)  Any profits   or gains  arising  from  the  transfer   of   a   capital   asset   effected   in   the  previous

Commissioner of Incoem Tax- 2, vs. M/s. Erythor Pharma Pvt. Ltd.,

In the result, the impugned order dated

ITTA/281/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 143(1)Section 260

capital gains which arose from the sales were declared. The appellant, for the purpose of capital gains, had shown the fair

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Supriya Wines

ITTA/591/2017HC Telangana07 Nov 2017

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

Section 131Section 132(1)Section 276Section 276C(1)

Capital Gain during the Financial Year 2013-14 relevant to Assessment Year 2014- 15 and during the course of Post

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Srimantha Granites

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/298/2015HC Telangana05 Nov 2015

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260

capital gains derived from the sale of their lands. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act and 1 Assessment

The Commissioner of Income Tax- I vs. Harmahendar Singh Bagga

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/176/2015HC Telangana08 Oct 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 260

capital gains derived from the sale of their lands. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act and 1 Assessment

The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, vs. Derco Cooling Coils Ltd,

Appeals are dismissed

ITTA/175/2015HC Telangana08 Oct 2015

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 260

capital gains derived from the sale of their lands. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act and 1 Assessment

The Commissioner of Income Tax III, vs. M/s. Swagath Seeds Private Limited

ITTA/346/2010HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 2(14)Section 260Section 64(1)(IV)

capital gain made by assessing authority relating to Rs.2,94,26,600/- as long term capital being transfer of land

Sri Damodarlal Badruka vs. The Income Tax Officer

The appeal is allowed but in the circumstances with

ITTA/299/2003HC Telangana17 Mar 2015

Bench: A RAMALINGESWARA RAO,DILIP B. BHOSALE

Section 45Section 54

capital gains?” 3. The facts of the case are that the Assessee, (who died during the pendency ITA No. 299/2003