← All Phrases

“Section 79(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 79Section 79(1)2 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 79(1) is CIT v. Krishna SSK (211 Taxmann 109), cited in 102 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 79(1)

CIT v. Krishna SSK
211 Taxmann 109 · 2012 · Supreme Court
102
citing judgments

The Supreme Court in CIT v. Krishna SSK establishes principles for de novo assessment of co-operative sugar factories concerning the tax implications of sugar sales to members, acknowledging that such sales are regulated under Section 79(A) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. These principles guide the computation of total income from these regulated transactions.

CIT v. Bhanji Lavji
79 ITR 582 · 1971 · Supreme Court
74
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer when the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed. The assessee is not obligated to instruct the Income-tax Officer on questions of law, nor can reassessment commence if the AO drew a wrong legal inference from disclosed facts.

Kusum Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
62 Taxmann.com 79 · 2015 · High Court
44
citing judgments

Interest cannot be separately charged on outstanding receivables from an associated enterprise if these receivables are an integral part of the underlying international transaction for which the arm's length price has already been determined. Such outstanding receivables are not considered a distinct international transaction.

79 Taxman 378/216 ITR 548 (Bom.) 4. CIT v. Macbrout Engineering (P.) Ltd.
52 Taxmann.com 219 · 2014 · High Court
43
citing judgments

If the Revenue accepts the Tribunal's decision for earlier years without challenge, it cannot assail the same decision in subsequent years, provided the facts are similar.

Ltd. v. CIT
79 ITR 589 · 1971 · Supreme Court
37
citing judgments

This case is authority for the principle that deductions under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act may be granted in respect of certain categories of receipts. The court's decision in this case is relied upon when interpreting the scope of business activities for tax purposes.

Viswanathan Chettiar v. Commr, of Income Tax, Madras
25 ITR 79 · 1954 · High Court
29
citing judgments

The time limit for completing an assessment or reassessment under Section 34(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, is calculated from the date the assessment or reassessment is made, not the date it is served on the assessee.

229 (g) CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri
79 Taxmann.com 257 · 2017 · High Court
26
citing judgments

An addition under Section 69 cannot be made solely based on a seller's statement admitting on-money, especially if the seller was not cross-examined and corroborating evidence is lacking. Such statements alone do not constitute sufficient grounds for reassessment.

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.
79 Taxmann.com 411 · 2017 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Additional depreciation is allowable for assets purchased and put to use for less than 180 days in the preceding assessment year.

Judgments citing Section 79(1)