229 (g) CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri
79 Taxmann.com 257High Court2017#4550 most cited
What is 229 (g) CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri authority for?
An addition under Section 69 cannot be made solely based on a seller's statement admitting on-money, especially if the seller was not cross-examined and corroborating evidence is lacking. Such statements alone do not constitute sufficient grounds for reassessment.
26
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri · 79 Taxmann.com 257 · Section 69 · on-money · seller's statement · cross-examination · corroborating evidence · reassessment · addition
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 229 (g) CIT v. Indrajit Singh Suri
Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2