← All Phrases

“Section 143(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 143Section 143(1)13,466 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 143(1) is Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji (167 ITR 471), cited in 3,926 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 143(1)

Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji
167 ITR 471 · 1987 · Supreme Court
3,926
citing judgments

Delay in filing appeals, when supported by sufficient or justifiable cause, should be condoned with a liberal approach to ensure substantial justice. This principle prioritizes the cause of justice over mere technicalities.

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT
243 ITR 83 · 2000 · Supreme Court
2,943
citing judgments

For revision under Section 263, the Assessing Officer's order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue; if either condition is not met, the revisionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked. An order is not erroneous merely because the Assessing Officer did not record the details of enquiries conducted, provided due enquiries were made.

CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory
359 ITR 565 · 2013 · High Court
2,590
citing judgments

A penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty proceedings are initiated for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. This non-specification vitiates the penalty proceedings.

CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.
38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
2,267
citing judgments

An appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can be dismissed for non-prosecution or treated as unadmitted when the appellant fails to appear, cooperate, or show diligence, in accordance with Rule 19(2) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules. The law aids the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.

CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.
322 ITR 158 · 2010 · Supreme Court
2,228
citing judgments

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income is not automatically leviable if the assessee has made a full disclosure of all particulars and the addition or disallowance arises from a difference of opinion.

CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.
313 ITR 340 · 2009 · High Court
2,118
citing judgments

Where an assessee claims that investments were made out of own funds, interest disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D may not apply if the assessee demonstrates the availability of sufficient interest-free funds to cover such investments.

Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT
223 ITR 480 · 1997 · High Court
2,040
citing judgments

A court or tribunal is not bound to answer a reference or adjudicate an appeal on its merits if the party at whose instance the proceeding is made fails to appear at the hearing or take necessary steps for its proper conduct.

Judgments citing Section 143(1)

ITO Ward 15(3)(1), Mumbai, Aayakar Bhawan vs. Suhasit Star Trading Private Limited, Mumbai Maharashtra

ITA 4771/MUM/2023[2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prabhash Shankarsuhasit Star Trading Pvt. V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward – Ltd. बनाम 15(3)(4), Room No. 15B, 01, Laura Building No. 13/21, Ground Floor, Aayakar 1St Dhobi Talao Lane, Mumbai– Bhavan, M.K. Road, 400002, Maharashtra Mumbai – 400020, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aapcs3728K Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Income Tax Officer, Ward – V/S. Suhasit Star Trading Pvt. 15(3)(4), Room No. 456, 4Th बनाम Ltd. Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Office No. 312, Sharda M.K. Road, Mumbai – Chambers No. 1, Keshavji N, 400020, Maharashtra Bhat Bazar, Masjid Bunder, Mumbai–400009, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aapcs3728K Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant By : Shri Neeraj Mangla,Ar (Virtually Appear) Respondent By : Ms. Kavita Kaushik, (Sr. Dr) Date Of Hearing 28.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 09.10.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Prabhash Shankar [A.M.] :- The Above Captioned Appeal In Ita 4623/Mum/2023 Is Preferred By The Assessee & Ita 4771/Mum/2023 Is Cross Appeal

For Appellant: Shri Neeraj Mangla,AR (Virtually appear)For Respondent: Ms. Kavita Kaushik, (Sr. DR)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER