RAMANATHANPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.,RAMANATHAPURAM vs. ITO, WARD-1,, RAMNAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT admitted the additional evidence filed by the assessee under Rule 29 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify this evidence and re-adjudicate the issues concerning "Cost of Management due" and "Deduction under Section 36(1)(vii a)", granting the assessee another opportunity to substantiate its claims.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a District Level Co-operative Bank, appealed against a CIT(A) order for AY 2016-17, which confirmed additions made during an assessment initiated under Section 147 read with Section 144B. The assessee contested disallowances related to "Cost of Management due" and "Deduction under Section 36(1)(vii a)", filing additional evidence before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowances for "Cost of Management due" and "Deduction under Section 36(1)(vii a)" were justified, and if the additional evidence should be considered by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 143(1),Section 36(1)(vii a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM:
The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 20.03.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”), dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment
:-2-: ITA. No.:1415//Chny/2025
order dated 21.09.2021 passed u/s.147 read with section 144B o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026