← All Phrases

“direct tax vivad se vishwas”

Settlement & AmnestyDTVSV 2020DTVSV 20202,154 judgments

Judgments citing direct tax vivad se vishwas

Priya Ramaswamy Bandiwaddar, Belgaum vs. Income Tax Officer Ward-6, Belgaum

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 261/PAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji04 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale& Shri Gd Padmahshalipriya Ramaswamy बनाम/ I T O. Ward -6, Bandiwaddar, Vs. Opp: Civil Hospital, H.No.660,Sector 5, Shree Dr.Ambedkar Road, Nagar,Belgaum-590016, Belgaum590001.Karnataka. Karnataka. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.:Cexpb0920B (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : Mr.Preetam R Bandiwaddar.Ar ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Mr.Manikandan.S. Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing 03/03/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 04/03/2025

For Appellant: Mr.Preetam R Bandiwaddar.ARFor Respondent: Mr.Manikandan.S. Sr.DR

time hearing, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is intended to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘ Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme(DTVSV) 2024’ and has filed Form no. 3 under DTVSV Rules. Per Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections. 3. We heard ... rival submissions and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme(DTVSV) 2024’ and has filed an Form 3 as envisaged by the Ld.AR vide withdrawal of appeal letter 01-03-2025. Hence we are of the view that, no purpose

Silkroad Sugar Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 963/CHNY/2016[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Mar 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 963/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 M/S. Parry Sugars Refinery Dcit India Private Limited, Vs. Corporate Range -6(2) Formerly Known As M/S. Silkroad Sugar Chennai. Private Limited, 234, N.S.C. Bose Road, Chennai-600 001. Pan: Aadcp-7828-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan & Mr.Sudarmani, Advocates ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Mr. Shivanand K.Kalakeri, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.03.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.03.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.R. Raghunatha: This Appeal Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Cit(A)-15, Chennai Order Dated 13.01.2016 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Relevant To The Assessment Year 2010-11 . 2. At The Outset, It Is Noticed That The Ld.Ar For The Assessee Filed Form No.1 Received From The Portal Under The Vsvs Scheme, 2024 For Withdrawal Of Appeal Stating That The Assessee Has Opted For Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. In Light Of The Above, We Dismiss The Appeal Of The Assessee As Withdrawn. However, Liberty Is Given To The Assessee To Seek Revival Of Appeal, In Case Assessee Remains Unsuccessful In Settlement Of Appeal Under The Scheme. 3. In The Result, The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Dismissed As Withdrawn. Order Pronounced In The Open Court On 4Th March, 2025. (एस.आर. रघुनाथा) (स स िव"ने" रिव) (S.S.Viswanethra Ravi) (S.R. Raghunatha) "ाियक सद"/लेखा सद"/

For Appellant: Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan &For Respondent: Mr. Shivanand K.Kalakeri, CIT
Section 250

Form No.1 received from the portal under the VSVS Scheme, 2024 for withdrawal of appeal stating that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. In light of the above, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee