SILKROAD SUGAR PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, ‘ए ’ Ûयायपीठ, चेÛन
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Įी स स िवˢनेũ रिव एवं Įी एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सदèय के सम¢
BEFORE SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 963/CHNY/2016
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ/Assessment Year: 2010-11

M/s. Parry Sugars Refinery
India Private Limited,
Formerly known as M/s. Silkroad Sugar
Private Limited,
234, N.S.C. Bose Road,
Chennai-600 001. PAN: AADCP-7828-H

Vs.
DCIT
Corporate Range -6(2)
Chennai.

(अपीलाथᱮ/Appellant)

(ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/Respondent)

अपीलाथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Appellant by : Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan &

Mr.Sudarmani, Advocates
ᮧ᭜यथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Respondent by : Mr. Shivanand K.Kalakeri, CIT

सुनवाई कᳱ तारीख/Date of Hearing : 04.03.2025
घोषणा कᳱ तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 04.03.2025

आदेश /O R D E R

PER S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This appeal of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)-15,
Chennai order dated 13.01.2016 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relevant to the Assessment Year 2010-11 .
2. At the outset, it is noticed that the ld.AR for the assessee filed
Form No.1 received from the portal under the VSVS Scheme, 2024
for withdrawal of appeal stating that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. In light of the above, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee to seek revival of appeal, in case assessee remains unsuccessful in settlement of appeal under the scheme.
3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 4th March, 2025. (स स िवˢनेũ रिव)
(एस.आर. रघुनाथा)
(S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) (S.R. RAGHUNATHA)
Ɋाियक सद˟/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद˟/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

चेÛनई/Chennai,
Ǒदनांक/Date: 04.03.2025

DS
आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/Copy to: