Procter and Gamble Health Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT 8(2)(1), Mumbai
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 328/MUM/2025[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2025AY 2005-06
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2005-06 Procter & Gamble Heath Ltd., The Dy. Cit-8(2)(1), P& G Plaza, Cardinal Gracias Road, Room No. 624, 6Th Floor, Vs. Chakala Andheri (East), Aayakar Bhavan, Sir M.K. Mumbai-400099. Road, Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaace 2616 F Appellant Respondent
For Appellant: Mr. Ajit Shah
Section 250Section 271(1)(c)
however treated the appeal as infructuous in The Ld. CIT(A) however treated the appeal as infructuous in view of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme opted by the assessee.
view of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme opted by the assessee.
view of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme ... infructuous as per Section 4(2) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se treated as infructuous as per Section 4(2) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Act,
2020.”
2.2 Before us, the Ld. counsel for the assessee however pointed
Before us, the Ld. counsel for the assessee however pointed