S SUMATHI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, INTERNATION TAXATION CIRCLE,, MADURAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's intention to withdraw the appeal under the DTVSV Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted for restoration if the DTVSV resolution fails.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2018-19. The assessee subsequently informed that the appeal is intended to be withdrawn to opt for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn in light of the assessee opting for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the final assessment order dated 06.01.2025, passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation Circle, MDU for the assessment year 2018-19 u/s.147 r.ws. 144C (13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter the ‘Act’) in pursuant to the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Bengaluru dated 27.12.2024.
At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted a letter dated 10.03.2025 wherein stated the present appeal is intended to be withdrawn by the assessee, for the purpose of opting the benefit under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024. Assessee also informed that in captioned appeal Form Nos.4 DTVSV is issued for the Assessment Years 2018-19 vide acknowledgment Number 920637351300325 dated 30.03.2025.
Accordingly, noting the fact that the assessee is opted for resolution of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024, we treat this appeal being dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee is given liberty for restoration of the present appeal in case the resolution of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024 is failed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 7th April, 2025
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026