ELANTHOLY VELAYUDHAN VIJAYAN,THRISSUR vs. ITO, WARD INT.TAX, KOCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal granted permission for the assessee to withdraw the appeal, with the provision that the appeal could be revived or reinstated if the DTVSV application is rejected. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2013-14 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee expressed intent to withdraw the appeal to settle the issues through the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV), a request to which the revenue had no objections.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw the appeal to pursue settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH:COCHIN
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
O R D E R PERKESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ITO Ward Int. Tax, Kochi dated 21.3.2024 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1063090970(1) for the AY 2013-14 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”).
When the matter was called on, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee intends to withdraw the appeal, as the issues in the appeal is sought to be settled through the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV). The revenue has also no objections for withdrawal of the appeal as requested by the assessee.
Accordingly, we permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive/reinstate the appeal, in the event the application in Form No.1 under DTVSV is rejected for any reason. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026