← All Phrases

“permanent account number”

Chapter XIV - Assessment ProcedureSection 139ASection 139A565 judgments

The decision most relied on for permanent account number is (i) Principal CIT v. Soft-line Creations Pvt. Ltd. (387 ITR 636), cited in 59 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on permanent account number

(i) Principal CIT v. Soft-line Creations Pvt. Ltd.
387 ITR 636 · 2016 · High Court
59
citing judgments

When an assessee provides the Permanent Account Numbers, affidavits of directors, and bank details of share applicants, this discharges the onus regarding the identity, genuineness of the transaction, and creditworthiness of the share applicants, precluding an addition under Section 68.

PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex
89 Taxmann.com 80 · 2018 · High Court
46
citing judgments

The addition of share application money to the income of the assessee under Section 68 is not justified if the assessee has discharged the initial onus by providing complete particulars and documentary evidence of the creditor, and the Revenue has failed to prove otherwise. The Supreme Court has also dismissed the Revenue's SLP in this matter.

Assistant Commissioner, Assessment II, Bangalore v. Velliappa Textiles Ltd.
263 ITR 550 · 2003 · Supreme Court
30
citing judgments

A body corporate is considered a juridical person and an artificial juridical person, distinct from natural persons or an association of persons. This status is recognized by the Income Tax Department, as indicated by the format of a Permanent Account Number (PAN).

CLSA India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
149 Taxmann.com 380 · 2023 · High Court
10
citing judgments

An active Permanent Account Number (PAN) for a non-existent entity, post-amalgamation, does not justify reassessment proceedings against that entity. The revenue cannot rely on an active PAN to dilute established legal principles regarding the assessment of merged entities.

Judgments citing permanent account number

Narayani Siddhar Peedam Charitable Trust, Vellore vs. DDIT (Exemptions-III), Chennai

ITA 1532/CHNY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1532/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri Narayani Siddhar Peedam Charitable Trust, Rep. By Trustee, K. Soundararajan, Thirumalaikodi, Ariyur Village, Vellore 632 055. Pan: Aaatn 3254F (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/Appellant By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/Respondent By सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement The Deputy Director Of Vs. Income Tax, (Exemptions – Iii) Chennai (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri N. Muralikumaran, Sr. Advocate : Ms. Mythili, Jcit : 25.11.2025 : 26.11.2025 आदेश/Order Per George George K: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Addl/Jcit(A)-5, Mumbai Dated 29.03.2025, Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called 'The Act'). The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2011-12. :- 2 -:

Section 115BSection 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80G(5)(vi)

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'ए' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'A' BENCH, CHENNAI श्री जॉर्ज जॉर्ज के, उपाध्यक्ष