SONU DUSAD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, 1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) based on High Court directions. It was held that the notice issued under Section 153C by the Jaipur ITO lacked jurisdiction as the assessee's case was not transferred from Delhi to Jaipur.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were related to assessment years 2015-16 to 2021-22. The original assessment orders were passed under Section 153C read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged the CIT(A)'s dismissal of appeals on grounds of delay and lack of jurisdiction.
What were the issues?
The key issues were whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal on delay without considering the facts and High Court directions, and whether the assessment notice under Section 153C was issued without jurisdiction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 144,Section 127,Section 153D,Section 69,Section 115BBE,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(29)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing82 ITR 540 · 1971 · SC
- CIT v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.1,558 citing1 SCC 1 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hero Cycles Ltd.470 citing189 Taxmann 50 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- Vijay Television (P.) Ltd. v. DRP140 citing128 Taxmann.com 426 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Paville Projects (P.) Ltd.83 citing149 Taxmann.com 115 · 2023 · SC · Read judgment
- India in Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee of Rash55 citing12 SCC 649 · 2013
- Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India46 citing31 ITR 565 · 1957 · SC
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Md. Warasat Hussain43 citing35 Taxmann 227 · 1988 · HC
- A.V. Papayya Sastry v. Government Of A.P34 citing4 SCC 221 · 2007
- Ajantha Industries v. CBDT28 citing102 ITR 281 · 1976 · SC
- 102 ITR 281 41-44 4 Rajesh Mahajan v. CIT (2010) 320 ITR 74 45-49 5 Arti Ship Breaking v. DIT22 citing92 ITR 287 · 1973 · HC
- Kashiram Aggarwalla v. Union of India20 citing56 ITR 14 · 1965 · SC
- CIT (2013) 355 ITR 255 157-176 16 177-191 17 Pankaj Mani Kulshreshtha v. ITO (ITAT Jaipur) (B) Case17 citing141 Taxmann.com 477 · 2022 · SC
- S.No. Particulars Commissioner of Income-tax v. Gujarat10 citing129 Taxmann 65 · 2003 · SC
- 129 Taxman 65 (SC) 1 2 Khatau Junkar Ltd. v. K. S. Pathania9 citing61 Taxmann 157 · 1992 · HC
- 3629/2017.\nIn Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Headstrong Services\nIndia Pvt Ltd.8 citing318 CTR 369 · HC
- GE Oil and Gas India Private Ltd. v. ACIT8 citing436 ITR 168 · HC
- Union of India v. Ashok Kumar8 citing8 SCC 760 · 2005
- Paville Projects (P) Ltd. v. CIT7 citing160 Taxmann.com 759 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- Shree Ram Vessel Scrap P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax7 citing355 ITR 255 · 2013 · HC
- Deep Channel Kothari v. CIT6 citing35 Taxmann 223
- 1 Kashiram Aggarwalla v. Union of India (1965) 56 ITR 14 29-35 2 35-40 3 Ajantha Industries v. CBDT5 citing320 ITR 74 · 2010
- 180 Genus Electrotech Ltd. v. Union of India5 citing129 Taxmann.com 458 · 2021
- Aamby Valley Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income5 citing41 Taxmann.com 15 · 2014 · HC
- Genus Electrotech Ltd. v. Union of India5 citing402 ITR 221 · 2018
- Lachhman Dass v. Jagat Ram5 citing10 SCC 448 · 2007
- Vishal Kumar v. Commissioner of Income5 citing44 Taxmann.com 180 · 2014 · HC
- 3 Taxmann 6344 citing3 Taxmann 634
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 505 to 509/JP/2025
PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
The details of the five separate orders which are under challenge
before this tribunal are as under :
Sr. No. ITA No. Assessment Date on which the Date and section Year Impugned order was under which the passed by the assessment order Commissioner of was passed by Income Tax, Appeals- DCIT, Central 4,Jaipur [CIT(A)] Circle-1, Jaipur 1 505/JP/2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026