PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex

89 Taxmann.com 80High Court2018#2530 most cited

What is PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex authority for?

The addition of share application money to the income of the assessee under Section 68 is not justified if the assessee has discharged the initial onus by providing complete particulars and documentary evidence of the creditor, and the Revenue has failed to prove otherwise. The Supreme Court has also dismissed the Revenue's SLP in this matter.

46

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex · Section 68 · share application money · onus of proof · creditworthiness of creditor · addition u/s 68 · Section 143(3) · Section 153A · accumulated profits · permanent account number · paper company · shell company · entry operator · disallowance of interest expenditure · source of source

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex

Claymine Microns LLP, Wankaner vs. Principal CIT 1, Rajkot

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 216/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 216/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Claymine Microns Llp Vs. Pcit Survey No. 59 At Ratavirda, Nr. Capron Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course Ceramic Sartanpar Road, Wankaner, Ring Road, Rajkot, Gujarat - Gujarat - 363641 360001 Pan/Gir No.: Aamfc4286C (Assessee) (Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Hardik Vora, Ar राज" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026

For Appellant: Shri Hardik Vora, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 216/RJT/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Claymine Microns LLP Vs. PCIT Survey No. 59 at Ratavirda, Nr. Capron Aayakar Bhawan, Race Course Ceramic Sartanpar Road, Wankaner, Ring Road, Rajkot, Gujarat - Gujarat - 363641 360001 PAN/GIR No.: AAMFC4286C (Assessee) (Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Hardik Vora, AR राज" की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 16/02/2026…

DCIT CC 7(3), Mumbai vs. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1596/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar & Deputy Commissioner Of V/S. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/Mum/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 1595/Mum/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, बनाम Income Tax, Central Circle –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Misra, (CIT-DR)
Section 131(1)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Deputy Commissioner of v/s. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AALPP1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/MUM/2020 (Arising out of ITA No. 1595/MUM/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, v…

DCIT CC 7(3), Mumbai vs. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1595/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar & Deputy Commissioner Of V/S. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/Mum/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 1595/Mum/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, बनाम Income Tax, Central Circle –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Misra, (CIT-DR)
Section 131(1)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Deputy Commissioner of v/s. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AALPP1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/MUM/2020 (Arising out of ITA No. 1595/MUM/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, v…

Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(1), Surat vs. Manidhara Realty LLP, Surat

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 327/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.327/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Income Tax Officer Manidhara Realty Llp बनाम/ Ward-2(3)(1), Surat Room 501, International Business Centre, Vs. No.614, Aayakar Bhawan, Dumas Road, Piplod, Surat-395 0017 Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abcfm 2991 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.327/SRT/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical court hearing) Income Tax Officer Manidhara Realty LLP बनाम/ Ward-2(3)(1), Surat Room 501, International Business Centre, Vs. NO.614, Aayakar Bhawan, Dumas Road, Piplod, Surat-395 0017 Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: ABCFM 2991 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Appellant by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA राज" की ओर से /Respondent by Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr-DR…

ITO, Ward-1(2)(1), Ahmedabad vs. Ms Goodfarm Rearing, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1081/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.1081/Ahd/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19 The Ito Ms Goodfarm Rearing Ward-1(2)(1) Ahmedabad बनाम/ V/S. 22-23, Shrimali Society Opp. Navrangpura Police Station Ahmedabad – 380 009 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aarfg 8677 L अपीलार्थी/ (Appellant) प्रत्यर्थी / (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate & Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, Ar Revenue By : Shri A.P. Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/03/2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 01/04/2025 आदेश/Order Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 26.09.2023 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)"] For The

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate &For Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 271ASection 68

…f this contention, reliance was placed on various judicial precedents including the judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in case of CIT v. Pankaj Dyestuff Industries – I.T. Ref. No. 241 of 1993 and PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex reported at (2018) 89 Taxmann.com 80. 8.1. The AR also submitted that the assessee had discharged the initial onus cast under section 68 by furnishing complete particulars and supporting documentary evidences. It was further submitted that the Ld. CIT(A), after considering these materials and recording a factual finding in para 6.3 of the appellate order, rightly deleted the a…

PCIT v. Vaishnodevi Refoils & Solvex (89 Taxmann.com 80) — Cited in 46 Judgments | BharatTax