← All Phrases

“satisfaction note”

Search & SeizureSection 153CSection 153C2,598 judgments

The decision most relied on for satisfaction note is CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd. (380 ITR 612), cited in 689 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on satisfaction note

CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd.
380 ITR 612 · 2016 · High Court
689
citing judgments

Completed assessments can be interfered with under Section 153A or 153C only on the basis of incriminating material unearthed during the search, necessitating a direct correlation between the discovered material and the power to assess or reopen concluded assessments.

CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears
362 ITR 673 · 2014 · Supreme Court
528
citing judgments

The recording of a satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer is a jurisdictional prerequisite for assessments under Section 153C, and the six-year limitation period for such assessments is reckoned from the date this satisfaction is recorded.

ARN Infrastructure India Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
394 ITR 569 · 2017 · High Court
282
citing judgments

For initiating proceedings under Section 153C, seized documents must be incriminating and specifically relate to the assessment years for which assessments are reopened. A document relevant only for one year cannot be used to reopen other assessment years without being incriminating for those years.

PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.
465 ITR 101 · 2024 · High Court
277
citing judgments

For assessments under Section 153C, the commencement point for calculating the six or ten assessment year block period is the date of issuing the Section 153C notice, or the date of the satisfaction note/handing over of books, as clarified by the first proviso to Section 153C(1).

DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma
159 Taxmann.com 179 · 2024 · High Court
269
citing judgments

Loose sheets of paper containing jottings, not shown to be part of regularly maintained books of accounts, do not constitute incriminating material for initiating assessment under section 153C. The satisfaction note required for 153C proceedings must specify the assessment year to which the alleged incriminating material belongs.

Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
370 ITR 295 · 2015 · High Court
249
citing judgments

Section 153C of the Income-tax Act is invoked only when it is established that seized documents do not belong to the searched person, or if the searched person disclaims them; the satisfaction note must specifically indicate this fact.

Manish Maheshwari v. ACIT
289 ITR 341 · 2007 · Supreme Court
237
citing judgments

A block assessment proceeding under section 158BD is illegal if the procedure laid down in section 153C is not followed. The provisions of section 153C are similar to section 158BD in block assessment proceedings.

Pepsi Foods (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
367 ITR 112 · 2014 · High Court
225
citing judgments

For assessments under Section 153C, a specific satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of the person searched, recorded prior to initiating proceedings, is a jurisdictional prerequisite, rendering its absence void. The approval function under Section 153D is administrative and does not require elaborate reasoning.

Judgments citing satisfaction note

Ksj Infrastructure Private Limited, Kolkata vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

ITA 1110/CHNY/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Mar 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1110/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11 M/S. Ksj Infrastructure The Deputy Commissioner Of Pvt. Ltd., V. Income Tax, 2Nd Floor, Grant Lane, Room Central Circle -1(1), No. 218, Kolkata – 700 012. Chennai – 600 0034. [Pan:Aadcc-5913-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. B. Rama Krishnan, Fca & Shri. Shrenik Chordia, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.01.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.03.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. B. Rama Krishnan, FCA and Shri. Shrenik Chordia, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B(1)Section 153CSection 234BSection 68

assessment years as laid down under the applicable provisions of Section 153A 1153C of the Act by appreciating that the date of recording satisfaction note in the case of the 'other person' by the Assessing Officer of the 'searched person' must be construed as the date of handing over ... relating to the assessee M/s. KSJ Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. The Assessing Officer of searched person, the DCIT, Central Circle -1(1), Chennai has recorded satisfaction note for proceedings u/s. 153C of the Act, dated 31.12.2021 and observed that, the seized material found during the course of search in the case

Vidhya Devi, Noida vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Noida

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 8198/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Feb 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Dey & Sh. M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2012-13 Vidhya Devi Dcit C/O M/S. Rra Tax India, D- Vs Central Circle 28, South Extension, Part-I, Noida New Delhi Pan No.Asbpd0089B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate Sh. Somil Agarwal, Advocate Sh. Deepesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By Sh. Daya Inder Singh Sidhu, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 07/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 22/02/2024 Order Per Saktijit Dey,Vp: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Arising Out Of Order Dated 23.10.2018 Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 4 (For Short “Cit(A)”), Kanpur For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Though, The Assessee Has Raised Multiple Grounds Both On Jurisdictional Issue As Well As On Merits, However, At The Very Outset We Proceed To Decide The Jurisdictional Issue Raised In Ground No.1, As It Goes To The Root Of The Matter.

Section 132Section 153Section 153C

153C of the Act is invalid as the AO has not found any incriminating material belonging to the assessee. Drawing our attention to the satisfaction note, he submitted, the only seized document referred therein is annexure LP-1 is a trust deed of PGP charitable trust. He submitted that except ... this document no other seized document / incriminating material has been referred to in the satisfaction note. He submitted that the trust deed of PGP charitable trust neither belongs to the assessee nor discloses any undisclosed income of the assessee. He submitted that the AO has recorded his common satisfaction note

ACIT, CC-1, Gurgaon vs. Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment

ITA 592/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.591/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 बनाम Acit Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Central Circle-1, F-1098, Basement, Gurgaon, Haryana. Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Cross Objection No. 88/Del/2023 (In I.T.A No.591/Del/2022) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 बनाम Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Acit F-1098, Basement, Vs. Central Circle-1, Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.592/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Acit Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-1, Vs. F-1098, Basement, Gurgaon, Haryana. Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Cross Objection No. 89/Del/2023 (In I.T.A No.592/Del/2022) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Acit F-1098, Basement, Vs. Central Circle-1, Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 132Section 139Section 153C

Counsel for the assessee referring to page 3 of the Paper Book submits that the Assessing Officer recorded satisfaction note I.T.A.Nos.591 & 592/Del/2022 & CO Nos. 88 & 89/Del/2023 on 02.02.2016 for making an assessment u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A of the Act and placing reliance on the decision of the Jurisdictional High ... Tribunal following various decisions including the jurisdictional High Court held that since there is no specific date of handing of material in the satisfaction note, the date of satisfaction note is to be reckoned as the date of handing over the material and the time limit calculating the six years

ACIT Central Circle-1, Gurgaon vs. Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment

ITA 591/DEL/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.591/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 बनाम Acit Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Central Circle-1, F-1098, Basement, Gurgaon, Haryana. Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Cross Objection No. 88/Del/2023 (In I.T.A No.591/Del/2022) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 बनाम Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Acit F-1098, Basement, Vs. Central Circle-1, Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.592/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Acit Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-1, Vs. F-1098, Basement, Gurgaon, Haryana. Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Cross Objection No. 89/Del/2023 (In I.T.A No.592/Del/2022) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Enpro Telecom Pvt. Ltd., Acit F-1098, Basement, Vs. Central Circle-1, Chittranjan Park, New Delhi. Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No. Aabce1400A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 132Section 139Section 153C

Counsel for the assessee referring to page 3 of the Paper Book submits that the Assessing Officer recorded satisfaction note I.T.A.Nos.591 & 592/Del/2022 & CO Nos. 88 & 89/Del/2023 on 02.02.2016 for making an assessment u/s 153C r.w.s. 153A of the Act and placing reliance on the decision of the Jurisdictional High ... Tribunal following various decisions including the jurisdictional High Court held that since there is no specific date of handing of material in the satisfaction note, the date of satisfaction note is to be reckoned as the date of handing over the material and the time limit calculating the six years

DCIT, Central Circle-2(1), Chennai vs. M/S Hill Max Export, Coimbatore

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 742/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.: 742/Chny/2023 & Co No.: 39/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Hill Max Export, Tax, V. No. 149/1, Central Circle 2(1), Pollachi Main Road, Room No. B3, Ground Floor, Kattampatti, Investigation Building, Jakkarpalayam-Vaipollachi, Chennai – 34. Coimbatore – 642 202. [Pan:Aahfh-2574-B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. V. Nanda Kumar, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Fca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. V. Nanda Kumar, CIT
Section 132Section 133ASection 139Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 69B

land and said documents were impounded vide ANN/SK/HM/B&D/Imp/Sl.No:1&2. Further, Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle 2(1), Chennai has recorded satisfaction note u/s. 153C of the Act, in the case of the assessee on 17.09.2020 and as per said satisfaction note, the Assessing Officer has considered ... initiated only when some materials of other person found during the course of searched person. Since, the Assessing Officer has recorded satisfaction note u/s. 153C of the Act, on the basis of material found during the course of survey u/s. 133A of the Act in the case of the assessee

DCIT Central Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. M/S Appu Food Products, Cuddalore Chennai

ITA 667/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Jan 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 663, 664 & 667/Chny/2023 & Co Nos.: 30, 31 & 32/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 &2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S. Appu Food Products, Tax, V. K-1, Sidco Industrial Estates, Central Circle 2(1), Vadalur, Cuddalore – 607 303. Room No. B3, Ground Floor, [Pan: Aabfa-1499-G] Investigation Building, Chennai – 34. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. M. V. Prasad, Ca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 24.01.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
Section 132

respect of material pertains to the appellant on 07.01.2021 for the purpose of assuming jurisdiction u/s. 153C of the Act. As per satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer of the searched person u/s. 153C of the Act, on the basis of electronic device seized at the residence of Shri ... called upon the assessee to explain the transactions contained in excel sheets. The assessee vide letter dated 16.02.2021 sought a copy of satisfaction note and seized materials relied upon. In the letter dated 16.02.2021, the assessee has denied any transactions outside the books of accounts. The assessee also stated that