M/S TJR PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CC-2, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment under Section 153A was invalid as no proper search or panchnama was conducted in the name of the assessee company. Regarding the additions under Section 68, the Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had rightly deleted them as the assessee had provided sufficient documentary evidence and the AO had failed to rebut it.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal (ITA No. 3/CHD/2023) and the Revenue's appeal (ITA No. 144/CHD/2023) relate to assessment year 2014-15. The primary issue in the assessee's appeal concerns the validity of assessment proceedings initiated under Section 153A without a valid search or panchnama. The Revenue's appeal challenges the deletion of additions made under Section 68.
What were the issues?
Whether assessment proceedings under Section 153A are valid without a search and panchnama in the assessee's name. Whether additions under Section 68 are justified when the assessee provides satisfactory documentary evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kabul Chawla3,235 citing61 Taxmann.com 412 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society1,589 citing96 Taxmann.com 468 · 2017 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia1,226 citing395 ITR 526 · 2017 · HC
- E.N. Gopakumar v. CIT428 citing75 Taxmann.com 215 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora253 citing367 ITR 517 · 2014 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia137 citing257 Taxmann 441 · 2018 · SC
- 361 ITR 4056 citing361 ITR 405 · HC
- Delhi in Alankar Saphire Developers v. Dy. CIT6 citing184 ITD 847 · 2020 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT
ITA No.3/CHD/2023 and ITA No.144/CHD/2023 are cross appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue,
ITA 3 &144/CHD/2023 A.Y. 2014-15 2
respectively, against the order dated 15.12.2022 pa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026