← All Phrases

“Section 254(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 254Section 254(2)468 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 254(2) is National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT (229 ITR 383), cited in 5,834 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 254(2)

National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT
229 ITR 383 · 1998 · Supreme Court
5,834
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can consider new claims and additional grounds if the relevant facts are already on record. The purpose of assessment is to correctly determine tax liability, allowing both parties to raise issues.

CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
349 ITR 98 · 2012 · High Court
818
citing judgments

When computing deduction under Section 10A, if communication or telecommunication expenses are excluded from export turnover, they must also be excluded from total turnover to maintain consistency and apply the ordinary meaning of 'turnover' in context.

ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd.
305 ITR 227 · 2008 · Supreme Court
470
citing judgments

Non-consideration of a decision by a jurisdictional High Court or the Supreme Court constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. However, non-consideration of a non-jurisdictional High Court decision does not typically amount to such a mistake.

Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. v. DIT
332 ITR 340 · 2011 · High Court
359
citing judgments

Payments for the use of equipment, such as satellite transponders, do not constitute 'royalty' under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or under applicable tax treaties, especially when there is no transfer of the right to use a process or underlying technology.

CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd.
103 Taxmann.com 57 · 2019 · Supreme Court
306
citing judgments

The Supreme Court holds that the issue of payment of excessive price on purchase of sugarcane by assesses is no longer res integra. The court elaborately dealt with this issue.

Bangalore Club v. CIT
350 ITR 509 · 2013 · Supreme Court
247
citing judgments

The Supreme Court affirmed the doctrine of mutuality, holding that contributions received from and returned to members for a common purpose do not constitute taxable profits. However, income from transactions with non-members or interest earned from investments in external entities (like cooperative banks) may break the mutuality chain and be taxable under Section 56, falling outside the scope of Section 80P deductions.

Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT
27 ITR 34 · 1955 · Supreme Court
174
citing judgments

The Supreme Court established the foundational test for distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure, holding that the aim and object of the expenditure and whether it brings into existence an asset or an advantage of an enduring nature determines its character, irrespective of the payment method. An advantage lasting five years or more can be considered enduring.

CIT v. Visakhapatnam Port Trust
144 ITR 146 · 1983 · High Court
124
citing judgments

Sections 4 and 5 of the Income Tax Act, which define total income and chargeability, are subject to Section 90, meaning that Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) override the Act's provisions in case of a conflict.

Judgments citing Section 254(2)

Ram Ji Lal, Yamuna Nagar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3, Yamuna Nagar

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 377/CHANDI/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Dec 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yaday & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 377/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Ram Ji Lal, Vs. Ito, बनाम C/O Tej Mohan Singh, Ward-3, Advocate Yamunanagar # 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh (Yamunanagar ) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Amtpl6623P अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. Tej Mohan, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Smt. Ranjit Kaur, Addl Cit, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 02.12.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.12.2024 आदेश/Order Per Rajpal Yadav Vp: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, Dated 21.03.2024 Passed For A.Y. 2007-08. 4. During The Course Of Hearing The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Submitted That Since The Assessee Has Moved An Application Under “The Direct Tax ‘Vivad Se Vishwas, 2024” Scheme & The Income Tax

For Appellant: Sh. Tej Mohan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Ranjit Kaur, Addl CIT, Sr. DR
Section 254(2)

आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH