ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd.
305 ITR 227Supreme Court of India2008#148 most cited
What is ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. authority for?
Non-consideration of a decision by a jurisdictional High Court or the Supreme Court constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. However, non-consideration of a non-jurisdictional High Court decision does not typically amount to such a mistake.
470
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.
Also referred to as
ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. · Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange · mistake apparent from record · section 154 · section 254(2) · rectification of mistake · non-consideration jurisdictional High Court · non-consideration Supreme Court · judicial precedent oversight · error on record · 305 ITR 227
Also reported as
173 Taxmann 322
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 470 · Page 1 of 24
...