Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Amiya Kumar Roy & Bros. v. CIT
206 ITR 306 · 1994 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Non-maintenance of stock by an assessee, which has a substantial effect on profit determination, justifies an inference that accounts were not maintained properly, allowing for estimation of income.

CIT v. Reliance Communication Infrastructure Ltd.
207 Taxmann 219 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed capital is not disallowable if investments or advances are made to subsidiary companies for the purpose of furthering the assessee's business.

27 ITR 34 (SC) Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT
21 ITR 353 · 1952 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure on a special advertisement campaign is not necessarily capital expenditure, even if incurred for opening new branches. The nature of the advantage derived from the expenditure is the key consideration.

(a) CIT v. Shahibag Entrepreneurs (P) Ltd.
215 ITR 810 · 1995 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure is deductible as wholly and exclusively for the purpose of trade or business if it is incurred as incidental to trade to keep the business going and profitable, not in any other capacity than as a trader. The assessee must satisfy the department regarding the purpose of the expenditure to be eligible for an allowance under Section 37(1).

CIT v. S. Ramamirtham
217 CTR 206 · 2008 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The intention of the assessee is relevant in determining whether shares are held for trading or investment purposes.

CIT v. Vidyut Steel ltd.
219 ITR 30 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Income derived from temporary deployment of funds is generally assessable as business income rather than income from other sources.

Smith Kline Amp; French (India) Ltd. and Ors. v. CIT
219 ITR 581 · 1996 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

Cess is not in the nature of tax, and therefore, not disallowable expenditure under Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act.

J.P. Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
229 ITR 123 · 1998 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Deductions under Section 80-HH and Section 80-I are independent, meaning a deduction under Section 80-HH does not need to be reduced from profits before calculating the deduction under Section 80-I.

CIT v. Translam Ltd.
231 Taxmann 901 · 2014 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest received from others must be excluded when computing the net amount eligible for deduction under section 80IA of the Act.

CIT v. Tamil Nadu Heat Treatment and Fetting Services (P) Ltd. (No. 1)
238 ITR 529 · 1999 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The process of heat treatment applied to automobile parts like crankshafts constitutes manufacturing and is eligible for deductions, as it renders the parts marketable by imparting essential qualities for their intended use, even without a physical change.

CIT v. Currency Investment Ltd.
241 ITR 494 · 2000 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A Tribunal allowing a claim for share loss cannot be considered erroneous or perverse if the loss is genuine and eligible for deduction.

1. CIT v. Saurashtra Cement 2. S.Zoraster & Co. v. CIT (322 ITR 59) 3. CIT v. Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation(
259 ITR 116 · 2003 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Compensation received for the cancellation of a distribution agreement, which leads to the impairment of the profit-making apparatus and sterilization of the source of income, is considered a capital receipt and exempt from tax.

CIT v. Schmetz India (P.) Ltd.
26 Taxmann.com 336 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Extraordinary profits alone do not prove an "arranged" manner for claiming higher deductions under Section 10A; the Assessing Officer must prove an arrangement between parties that resulted in such profits.

Goenka Agencies v. CIT
263 ITR 145 · 2003 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure paid in cash is not disallowable under section 40A(3) if the assessee establishes that the payment was made in exceptional and unavoidable circumstances or if payment by cheque was not practicable and would have caused genuine difficulty, provided the transaction is genuine.

CIT v. Sultan and Sons Rice Mill
272 ITR 181 · 2005 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Industrial undertakings do not need to be registered under the Factories Act, 1948, to qualify for deductions under sections 80J and 80HH of the Income Tax Act. The issue of needing permission for generating steam or cooling power is also not a prerequisite.

CIT v. Nameel Leathers & Uppers
273 ITR 350 · 2005 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The deduction for employee contributions to PF and ESIC is not allowed if not deposited by the employer before the due date prescribed under the Act. The time for deposit can be extended by the EPF Officer.

Elmer Havell Electrics and Ors. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax and Anr.
277 ITR 549 · 2005 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds is disallowed to the extent these funds are advanced interest-free to sister concerns or used for non-business purposes. This is because the borrowed funds are not being used for the purpose of the assessee's business.

CIT v. Jamal Photo Industries (I) (P.) Ltd.
287 ITR 620 · 2006 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Processing film and printing photographs from negatives is considered a manufacturing or production activity for tax purposes.

ITO v. Mokul Finance (P) Ltd.
29 SOT 11 · 2009 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an artificial juridical person to maintain its existence and continue its business operations is allowable as a business deduction, provided it is not excessive or unreasonable for legitimate business needs.

Dhall Enterprise and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
295 ITR 481 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Amounts due from government bodies cannot be allowed as bad debts.

CIT v. Mangal Tirth Estates Ltd.
303 ITR 366 · 2008 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by a real estate developer under a development agreement, such as for air conditioning, car parking, advertisement, sales promotion, and legal charges, is considered a business expenditure deductible from income.

1. CIT v. Menon Impex (P) Ltd. (Mad)
304 ITR 322 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest income earned from deposits of export proceeds in a bank does not have a direct nexus with an industrial undertaking and therefore cannot be considered as business income for the purpose of claiming deductions.

Shri Ram Jhanwar Lal v. ITO
321 ITR 400 · 2010 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which allows for presumptive taxation, does not apply if the assessee's total turnover exceeds the limit specified in that section.

CIT & Anr. v. Balaji Engineering & Construction Works
323 ITR 351 · 2010 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 40A(3) read with section 6DD of the Rules is not justified when the assessee demonstrates circumstances that warrant an exception, as per the conditions laid out in the rules.

CIT v. Coimbatore Lakshmi Investment & Finance Co. Ltd.
331 ITR 229 · 2011 · High Court
12
citing judgments

An assessee is justified in not recognizing income if assets are classified based on RBI notifications, and the principle of accrual is not applicable in such scenarios. Expenditure incurred under Section 37 and the accrual of income are distinct concepts.

Income Tax Officer (2008) 5 DTR (Mum) 29 Shri Navinchandra N. Majithia 401, CIT v. Gopal Purohit
334 ITR 308 · 2011 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

Frequency of transactions, volume, magnitude, use of borrowed funds, period of holding, and assessee's infrastructure are key factors in determining whether transactions constitute business income or capital gains, based on the facts of each case.

CIT v. Car
335 ITR 94 · 2011 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Discounting charges paid by an assessee are not interest income under Section 2(28A) if they are not payable in respect of money borrowed or debt incurred. Such charges are not disallowable under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. G4S Securities System (India) P. Ltd.
338 ITR 46 · 2011 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The nature of an agreement, including its duration, renewal terms, and the basis of commission payments (percentage of net sales versus lump sum), are factors considered in determining its characterization for tax purposes. The termination or expiration of such agreements is also relevant.

Shyam Bihari v. CIT & ANR.
345 ITR 283 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest earned on Fixed Deposits/Demand Drafts/Earnest Money Deposits made for business purposes is to be treated as business income, not income from other sources. The Revenue cannot treat such interest as income from other sources solely on the grounds that details of the FDRs were not furnished to the Assessing Officer if such details were otherwise on record and the FDRs were demonstrably for business purposes.

CIT v. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd.
349 ITR 65 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on acquiring a software license with a shelf life of less than two years is allowable as revenue expenditure.

CIT v. Softworks Computers Pvt. Ltd.
354 ITR 16 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A loan taken for the acquisition of a capital asset, when subsequently waived, is not chargeable to tax.

CIT v. Meghalaya Steels Ltd. & Pride Coke Pvt. Ltd.
356 ITR 235 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Profits derived from industrial undertakings are eligible for deductions under sections like 80-IB or 80-IC, provided there is a direct nexus between subsidies received (such as transport, interest, power, or insurance subsidies) and the profits and gains generated by the industrial undertaking's manufacturing activities.

CIT(A) v. ACL Wireless Ltd.
361 ITR 210 · 2014 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the purchase of application software is allowable as a revenue expenditure if it is part of business operations.

CIT v. IRFC Ltd.
362 ITR 548 · 2014 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on bond issue expenses is treated as revenue expenditure. Lease equalization charges may be disallowed/deleted from the profit and loss account for computing book profit under Section 115JA.

CIT v. Sahu Construction (P) Ltd.
362 ITR 609 · High Court
12
citing judgments

When the Assessing Officer rejects the books of account and estimates the net profit, no separate deduction, including depreciation, is allowable.

Additional CIT v. Dhampur Sugar Mill P. Ltd.
370 ITR 194 · 2015 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for laying power transmission lines, which upon erection constitute the exclusive property of the electricity supply company, is not capital expenditure for the assessee.

CIT v. Forteleza Developers
374 ITR 510 · 2015 · High Court
12
citing judgments
T Vs. Chemosyn Ltd 371 ITR 427 (Bom) 75-79 14 Poorna Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. CIT
39 ITR 8 · 1960 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

Income accrues or arises to an assessee when it becomes due to him, even if it is not actually received. The taxing of income is based on real income, not notional income.

R 217 (Delhi) (HC) 2. National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. CIT
393 ITR 666 · 2017 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A liability incurred by an assessee, even if disputed, is deductible in the year it is incurred and becomes enforceable, such as through an arbitration award or court decree, regardless of subsequent legal challenges or stays.

CIT v. Sahu Investment Mutual Benefit Co Ltd.
396 ITR 595 · 2017 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The doctrine of 'lifting the corporate veil' is not applied as a matter of course and requires cogent and compelling reasons with detailed factual investigation. Payments made to related parties cannot be disallowed without proving they were not for bonafide reasons.

CIT v. Shah Alloys Ltd.
396 ITR 711 · 2017 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest received on margin money placed for business purposes is not taxable as income from other sources and is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA as it is incidental to the assessee's business.

Zandu Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. CIT 350 ITR 356(Bom), CIT v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
42 Taxmann.com 132 · 2014 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenses relatable to a specific industrial undertaking can only be deducted while computing profits and gains of that undertaking. Expenses not relevant to the industrial undertaking cannot be deducted.

DCIT v. Tata Sons Ltd.
43 SOT 27 · 2011 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

State taxes paid overseas cannot be allowed as a deduction in view of Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, subsequent judicial pronouncements may alter this position.

PCIT v. Punjab National Bank,\n
449 ITR 468 · 2022 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred in relation to income earned from securities held as stock-in-trade is not disallowable under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.

JCIT v. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.
450 ITR 164 · 2023 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

The Supreme Court held that the term 'tax' under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act includes cess. This decision clarifies that disallowance under section 40(a)(ii) applies to education cess, and subsequent retrospective amendments to the section are relevant.

Kodidasn Appalaswamy & Suryanarayana v. CIT
46 ITR 262 · 1962 · Reported
12
citing judgments

The rate of profit to be applied for assessment purposes is the average profit reported in the preceding three years. This rate should be adopted from contract receipts as total income.

CIT v. National Storage (P.) Ltd.
48 ITR 577 · 1963 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Income derived from leasing out commercial property, such as warehouses constructed by the assessee, constitutes business income. This is especially true when the property is specifically constructed for a particular business purpose and licensed accordingly.

(ii) Commissioner of Income-tax II v. Leo Formulations (P.)Ltd.
48 Taxmann.com 328 · 2014 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Amounts received from sales do not automatically represent the income of an assessee when the assessee has not disclosed these sales, and such sales only represent the price received for goods acquired at a cost.

State of Andhra Pradesh v. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.
5 SCC 203 · 2002 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

Electric energy can be treated as movable property, capable of being transmitted, transferred, delivered, and stored. The generation of electricity is considered production.

Capital Markets India P. Ltd., vs. ACIT 4.139 R 149 (AP), CIT v. Shah Pratapchand Nowpaji 5
50 SOT 592 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Losses incurred in a trade transaction, even if due to an error and not recovered for business reasons, are considered losses in the course of business and should be allowed as such.