JCIT v. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.

450 ITR 164Supreme Court of India2023#9279 most cited
12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing JCIT v. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd.

INSIGHT PRINT COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE PCIT, MUMBAI-4, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3384/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2020-21 Insight Print Communications Pcit, Mumbai-4 Private Limited A-14, Synthofine Industrial Estate, Behind Virvani Industrial Estate, Vs. Dindoshi, Off Aarey Road, Goregaon (East), Mumbai – 400063 (Pan: Aabci6530P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee : Shri Lalchand Choudhary, Ca Revenue : Shri R.A. Dhyani, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 08.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.12.2025 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Revisionary Order By Ld. Pcit, Mumbai-4, Vide Order No. Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2024- 25/1074740466(1), Dated 20.03.2025 Passed U/S. 263 Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”) Against The Assessment Order By Assessment Unit, U/S. 143(3) R.W.S.144B Of The Act, Dated 22.09.2022, For Ay 2020-21. 2. Grounds Taken By Assessee Are Reproduced As Under: 1. The Appellant Prefers The Following Appeal Against The Order Dated 20/03/2025 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-4 (Hereinafter Referred To As "The Pcit ") Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ("The Act"). Each Of The Grounds Is In Alternative & Without Prejudice To Other.

For Appellant: Shri Lalchand Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Shri R.A. Dhyani, CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 40

…be applied prospectively and not retrospectively, as there was lack of clarity till the pronouncement of 4 Insight Print Communications Pvt. Ltd. AY 2020-21 law by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of JCIT vs Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Limited [2023] 450 ITR 164 (SC) vide order dated 14.12.2022. Accordingly, two views were possible and the AU had taken one of the possible views by allowing the claim made by the assessee. Hence the issue raised by the ld. PCIT cannot be the subject of review u/s. 263 of the Act. Assessee also contended on the jurisdictional aspect of the assessment order by submitting tha…

AARTI DRUGS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-CC-3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee for 2013-14 to 2016-17 are dismissed

ITA 2874/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआअसं.2872/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2013-14) आअसं.2871/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2014-15) आअसं.2874/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2015-16) आअसं.2870/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2016-17) Aarti Drugs Limited, Plot No.9D 3Rd Floor, Mahendra Industrial Estate, Road No.29, Sion East, Mumbai 400 022. Pan: Aaaca-4410-D ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Acit –Cc -3(2), Room No.1913, 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : Shri Vipul Jain "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent By : Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा की ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 14/12/2023 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Vipul JainFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha
Section 37(1)

…Finance Act, 2022, considering to be retrospective. 5. Per contra, Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha representing the Department submitted that the issue is now settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of JCIT vs. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., 450 ITR 164 and again in the case of CIT vs. Sesa Goa Ltd.,155 taxmann.com 34 holding Education Cess is not an allowable deduction. 3 ITA NO.2871/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2014-15) ITA NO.2870/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2016-17) 6. Both sides heard. The solitary issue raised in appeal by the assessee is in respect of disallowance of education cess. It is no more res-integra that…

AARTI DRUGS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-CC-3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee for 2013-14 to 2016-17 are dismissed

ITA 2872/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआअसं.2872/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2013-14) आअसं.2871/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2014-15) आअसं.2874/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2015-16) आअसं.2870/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2016-17) Aarti Drugs Limited, Plot No.9D 3Rd Floor, Mahendra Industrial Estate, Road No.29, Sion East, Mumbai 400 022. Pan: Aaaca-4410-D ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Acit –Cc -3(2), Room No.1913, 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : Shri Vipul Jain "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent By : Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा की ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 14/12/2023 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Vipul JainFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha
Section 37(1)

…Finance Act, 2022, considering to be retrospective. 5. Per contra, Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha representing the Department submitted that the issue is now settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of JCIT vs. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., 450 ITR 164 and again in the case of CIT vs. Sesa Goa Ltd.,155 taxmann.com 34 holding Education Cess is not an allowable deduction. 3 ITA NO.2871/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2014-15) ITA NO.2870/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2016-17) 6. Both sides heard. The solitary issue raised in appeal by the assessee is in respect of disallowance of education cess. It is no more res-integra that…

AARTI DRUGS LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-CC 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee for 2013-14 to 2016-17 are dismissed

ITA 2871/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआअसं.2872/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2013-14) आअसं.2871/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2014-15) आअसं.2874/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2015-16) आअसं.2870/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2016-17) Aarti Drugs Limited, Plot No.9D 3Rd Floor, Mahendra Industrial Estate, Road No.29, Sion East, Mumbai 400 022. Pan: Aaaca-4410-D ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Acit –Cc -3(2), Room No.1913, 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : Shri Vipul Jain "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent By : Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा की ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 14/12/2023 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Vipul JainFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha
Section 37(1)

…Finance Act, 2022, considering to be retrospective. 5. Per contra, Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha representing the Department submitted that the issue is now settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of JCIT vs. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., 450 ITR 164 and again in the case of CIT vs. Sesa Goa Ltd.,155 taxmann.com 34 holding Education Cess is not an allowable deduction. 3 ITA NO.2871/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2014-15) ITA NO.2870/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2016-17) 6. Both sides heard. The solitary issue raised in appeal by the assessee is in respect of disallowance of education cess. It is no more res-integra that…

AARTI DRUGS LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-CC 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee for 2013-14 to 2016-17 are dismissed

ITA 2870/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआअसं.2872/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2013-14) आअसं.2871/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2014-15) आअसं.2874/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2015-16) आअसं.2870/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2016-17) Aarti Drugs Limited, Plot No.9D 3Rd Floor, Mahendra Industrial Estate, Road No.29, Sion East, Mumbai 400 022. Pan: Aaaca-4410-D ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Acit –Cc -3(2), Room No.1913, 19Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : Shri Vipul Jain "ितवादी"ारा/Respondent By : Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 14/12/2023 घोषणा की ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 14/12/2023 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Vipul JainFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mumar Sinha
Section 37(1)

…Finance Act, 2022, considering to be retrospective. 5. Per contra, Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha representing the Department submitted that the issue is now settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of JCIT vs. Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd., 450 ITR 164 and again in the case of CIT vs. Sesa Goa Ltd.,155 taxmann.com 34 holding Education Cess is not an allowable deduction. 3 ITA NO.2871/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2014-15) ITA NO.2870/MUM/2023 (A.Y.2016-17) 6. Both sides heard. The solitary issue raised in appeal by the assessee is in respect of disallowance of education cess. It is no more res-integra that…