INSIGHT PRINT COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE PCIT, MUMBAI-4, MUMBAI
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 3384/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2020-21 Insight Print Communications Pcit, Mumbai-4 Private Limited A-14, Synthofine Industrial Estate, Behind Virvani Industrial Estate, Vs. Dindoshi, Off Aarey Road, Goregaon (East), Mumbai – 400063 (Pan: Aabci6530P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee : Shri Lalchand Choudhary, Ca Revenue : Shri R.A. Dhyani, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 08.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.12.2025 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Revisionary Order By Ld. Pcit, Mumbai-4, Vide Order No. Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2024- 25/1074740466(1), Dated 20.03.2025 Passed U/S. 263 Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”) Against The Assessment Order By Assessment Unit, U/S. 143(3) R.W.S.144B Of The Act, Dated 22.09.2022, For Ay 2020-21. 2. Grounds Taken By Assessee Are Reproduced As Under: 1. The Appellant Prefers The Following Appeal Against The Order Dated 20/03/2025 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-4 (Hereinafter Referred To As "The Pcit ") Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ("The Act"). Each Of The Grounds Is In Alternative & Without Prejudice To Other.
For Appellant: Shri Lalchand Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Shri R.A. Dhyani, CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 40
…be applied prospectively and not retrospectively, as there was lack of clarity till the pronouncement of 4 Insight Print Communications Pvt. Ltd. AY 2020-21 law by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of JCIT vs Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Limited [2023] 450 ITR 164 (SC) vide order dated 14.12.2022. Accordingly, two views were possible and the AU had taken one of the possible views by allowing the claim made by the assessee. Hence the issue raised by the ld. PCIT cannot be the subject of review u/s. 263 of the Act. Assessee also contended on the jurisdictional aspect of the assessment order by submitting tha…