Majestic Exports v. JCIT

62 Taxmann.com 307Reported decision2015#9112 most cited

What is Majestic Exports v. JCIT authority for?

The loss on forward contracts can be allowed as a deduction if it pertains to the business of manufacture of cotton textiles and the forward contracts are in respect of those goods.

12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2019.

Also referred to as

Majestic Exports v. JCIT · 62 taxmann.com 307 · loss on forward contract · cotton textiles · business income · deduction · assessment order · section 143(3) · section 263

Judgments citing Majestic Exports v. JCIT

DCIT, Chennai vs. Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and cross- objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 997/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016 & C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/2016 (In Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2008-09, 2011-12, 2010-11 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Income Tax, V. B-1, Mth Road, Padi, Corporate Circle 6(2), Chennai - 600 050. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aadcs 4888 E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent & Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Shri R. Durai Pandian, JCITFor Respondent: Sh. N. Devanathan, Advocate
Section 43(5)

…the employees. Hence, according to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee and made addition for all the years. The CIT(Appeals), however, by placing reliance on the order of this Tribunal in Majestic Exports v. JCIT (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 307, allowed the claim of the assessee. According to the Ld. D.R., the Department has already filed an appeal before the High Court and the same is pending for adjudication. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the loss on 4 I.T.A. Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/16 C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/16 derivative transaction is a speculat…

DCIT, Chennai vs. Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and cross- objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 996/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016 & C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/2016 (In Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2008-09, 2011-12, 2010-11 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Income Tax, V. B-1, Mth Road, Padi, Corporate Circle 6(2), Chennai - 600 050. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aadcs 4888 E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent & Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Shri R. Durai Pandian, JCITFor Respondent: Sh. N. Devanathan, Advocate
Section 43(5)

…the employees. Hence, according to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee and made addition for all the years. The CIT(Appeals), however, by placing reliance on the order of this Tribunal in Majestic Exports v. JCIT (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 307, allowed the claim of the assessee. According to the Ld. D.R., the Department has already filed an appeal before the High Court and the same is pending for adjudication. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the loss on 4 I.T.A. Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/16 C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/16 derivative transaction is a speculat…

DCIT, Chennai vs. Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and cross- objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1302/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016 & C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/2016 (In Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2008-09, 2011-12, 2010-11 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Income Tax, V. B-1, Mth Road, Padi, Corporate Circle 6(2), Chennai - 600 050. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aadcs 4888 E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent & Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Shri R. Durai Pandian, JCITFor Respondent: Sh. N. Devanathan, Advocate
Section 43(5)

…the employees. Hence, according to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee and made addition for all the years. The CIT(Appeals), however, by placing reliance on the order of this Tribunal in Majestic Exports v. JCIT (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 307, allowed the claim of the assessee. According to the Ld. D.R., the Department has already filed an appeal before the High Court and the same is pending for adjudication. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the loss on 4 I.T.A. Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/16 C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/16 derivative transaction is a speculat…

DCIT, Chennai vs. Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and cross- objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1301/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016 & C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/2016 (In Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2008-09, 2011-12, 2010-11 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Income Tax, V. B-1, Mth Road, Padi, Corporate Circle 6(2), Chennai - 600 050. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aadcs 4888 E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent & Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Shri R. Durai Pandian, JCITFor Respondent: Sh. N. Devanathan, Advocate
Section 43(5)

…the employees. Hence, according to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee and made addition for all the years. The CIT(Appeals), however, by placing reliance on the order of this Tribunal in Majestic Exports v. JCIT (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 307, allowed the claim of the assessee. According to the Ld. D.R., the Department has already filed an appeal before the High Court and the same is pending for adjudication. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the loss on 4 I.T.A. Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/16 C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/16 derivative transaction is a speculat…

DCIT, Chennai vs. Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and cross- objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1299/CHNY/2016[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 May 2017AY 1998-99

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016 & C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/2016 (In Ita Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2008-09, 2011-12, 2010-11 & 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd., Income Tax, V. B-1, Mth Road, Padi, Corporate Circle 6(2), Chennai - 600 050. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aadcs 4888 E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent & Cross-Objector)

For Appellant: Shri R. Durai Pandian, JCITFor Respondent: Sh. N. Devanathan, Advocate
Section 43(5)

…the employees. Hence, according to the Ld. D.R., the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee and made addition for all the years. The CIT(Appeals), however, by placing reliance on the order of this Tribunal in Majestic Exports v. JCIT (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 307, allowed the claim of the assessee. According to the Ld. D.R., the Department has already filed an appeal before the High Court and the same is pending for adjudication. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the loss on 4 I.T.A. Nos.1299, 996, 997, 1302 & 1301/Mds/16 C.O. Nos.87, 71, 72, 88 & 89/Mds/16 derivative transaction is a speculat…

Majestic Exports v. JCIT (62 Taxmann.com 307) — Cited in 12 Judgments | BharatTax