Additional CIT v. Dhampur Sugar Mill P. Ltd.

370 ITR 194High Court2015#9233 most cited
12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2020.

Judgments citing Additional CIT v. Dhampur Sugar Mill P. Ltd.

DCIT RG. - 3(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. GUJARAT AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4374/MUM/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jan 2017AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited, The Dy. Commissioner Of 122, Maker Chambers, Iii, Income-Tax- Range 3(1), फनधभ/ Nariman Point, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400021. M K Marg, Mumbai-400020 Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Gujarat Ambuja Cements Tax-Range 3(1), Limited, 122, Maker फनधभ/ Room No.607, 6Th Floor, Chambers, Iii, Nariman Point, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400021 Vs. M K Marg, Mumbai-400020 स्थधमी रेखध सं./ Pan : Aaacg0569P (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) :

For Appellant: S/Shri Soumen Adak & HarishFor Respondent: Shri K B Shukla

…001) 249 ITR 787; B) National Organic Chemicals Ltd V/s CIT (1993) 203 ITR 410 (Bom) C) CIT V/s Associated Cementg Co. Ltd (1988) 172 ITR 257 (SC); D) CIT V/s Samsung India Ele.c Ltd (2014) 222 Taxman 21 (Del) E) Add.CIT V/s Dhampur Sugar Mills (P) Ltd (2015) 370 ITR 194 (All); F) CIT V/s Saw Pipes Ltd (2008) 300 ITR 35 (Del) 31 and 4374/Mum/2005 G) Mafatlas Fines Spg. And Mfg Co.Ltd V/s CIT (1993) 69 Taxman 385 (Bom); H) CIT V/s Excel Industries Ltd (1980) 122 ITR 995 (Bom) I) Hindustan Times Ltd V/s CIT (1980) 122 ITR 977 (Del) On the basis of these submissions and case law the ld AR prayed that the order pass…

M/S. GUJARAT AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG. 3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3360/MUM/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jan 2017AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited, The Dy. Commissioner Of 122, Maker Chambers, Iii, Income-Tax- Range 3(1), फनधभ/ Nariman Point, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400021. M K Marg, Mumbai-400020 Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Gujarat Ambuja Cements Tax-Range 3(1), Limited, 122, Maker फनधभ/ Room No.607, 6Th Floor, Chambers, Iii, Nariman Point, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400021 Vs. M K Marg, Mumbai-400020 स्थधमी रेखध सं./ Pan : Aaacg0569P (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) :

For Appellant: S/Shri Soumen Adak & HarishFor Respondent: Shri K B Shukla

…001) 249 ITR 787; B) National Organic Chemicals Ltd V/s CIT (1993) 203 ITR 410 (Bom) C) CIT V/s Associated Cementg Co. Ltd (1988) 172 ITR 257 (SC); D) CIT V/s Samsung India Ele.c Ltd (2014) 222 Taxman 21 (Del) E) Add.CIT V/s Dhampur Sugar Mills (P) Ltd (2015) 370 ITR 194 (All); F) CIT V/s Saw Pipes Ltd (2008) 300 ITR 35 (Del) 31 and 4374/Mum/2005 G) Mafatlas Fines Spg. And Mfg Co.Ltd V/s CIT (1993) 69 Taxman 385 (Bom); H) CIT V/s Excel Industries Ltd (1980) 122 ITR 995 (Bom) I) Hindustan Times Ltd V/s CIT (1980) 122 ITR 977 (Del) On the basis of these submissions and case law the ld AR prayed that the order pass…

M/S. OVERSEAS CARPETS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5062/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Mar 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Overseas Carpets Ltd, V/S Asstt. Commissioner Of 1-1/16, Shanti Mohan House, Income Tax, Circle-13 (1), Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi New Delhi (Pan: Aaaco0404H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Ms. Charu Goyal, Ca Respondent By Sh. P. Dam Kanunjana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24/02/2016 Date Of Pronouncement 22/03/2016 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.: This Appeal Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Order Dated 13/07/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Xvi, New Delhi For Assessment Year 2008-09 Raising Following Grounds: 1. That The Cit Appeals Has Erred In Determining The Total Income At Rs. 1,63,91,923/-. 2. That The Ld. Cit Appeals Of Income Tax Has Erred In Making Disallowance Of Rs. 13,91,082/- Under Section 14A Of The Act, Which Is Bad In Law & Against Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 3. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Amend, Amplify Or Delete Any Or All Of The Grounds Of Appeal Before Or At The Time Of Hearing.

Section 143(3)Section 14A

…d which is not exempt income, the interest paid cannot be held disallowable under the rule 8D(2)(ii) of the rules. The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad in the case of Additional Commissioner of Income- tax versus Dhampur sugar Mills private limited reported in 370 ITR 194 has also given similar finding. The relevant part of the judgment is as under: “In the appeal, the Tribunal has confirmed the finding. The Tribunal has observed that the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) were not controverted on behalf of the revenue. Once it was duly established that no borrowed funds on which interest was paid had been in…