ITO v. Mokul Finance (P) Ltd.

29 SOT 11Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2009#8967 most cited
12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ITO v. Mokul Finance (P) Ltd.

SNW SMITH CONSULTANT PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 5, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2635/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansnw Smith Consultant Private Limited, Vs. Dcit, Central Circle 5, 112-Gl, Antriksh Bhawan, New Delhi. 22, Kg Marg, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aakcs4626B) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Hasneeta Matta, Advocate Shri Mahan Kalra, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2025 Date Of Order : 08.10.2025 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman: 1. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-24, New Delhi (For Short ‘Ld. Cit (A)) For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are, This Is Second Round Of Appeal After Setting Aside The Appeal Preferred By The Assessee To The File Of The Ao By The Coordinate Bench Vide Ita No.1588/Del/2020 To Verify The Expenditures Claimed By The Assessee Even Though There Was No Business Income

For Appellant: Ms. Hasneeta Matta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)

…that the expenditure that he had incurred was expended for the purpose of his business. 3.6. The above ratio has been followed by this Hon'ble jurisdictional Tribunal in a plethora of cases, e.g., Hon'ble Delhi Tribunal in ITO v. Mokul Finance (P) Ltd. [2009] 29 SOT 11 (Delhi) (URO); Hon'ble Delhi Tribunal in DCIT v. NCR Business Park (P.) Ltd [2022J 141 taxmann.com 563 (Delhi - Trib.). 4. Key issues in appeal Lawyer Fees - not for litigation but Advisory and drafting of proposals 4.1. The Ld. AO/CIT(A) have disallowed two expenses. one, on account of Lawyers fees towards seeking legal guidance/opinion (pages 70…

BARA MACHINES PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 1509/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Apr 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Hon’Ble&Smt. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं.Ita No. 1509/Ahd/2014 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Bara Machines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ito C/O. Ritaben B. Patel Ward-1(2) (Director) Pratyaksh Vera Bhavan, 1/5-6, Manichandra Society, Ambawadi, Nr. Surdhara Circle, Thaltej, Ahmedabad- 380015 Ahmedabad- 380054 Pan:Aab Cb8 696 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Revenue byFor Respondent: ShriJames Kurien,Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 22Section 24Section 32

…आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद"यायपीठ ‘A’- अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘A’ BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, HON’BLEVICE PRESIDENT &SMT. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं.ITA No. 1509/Ahd/2014 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Bara Machines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO C/o. Ritaben B. Patel Ward-1(2) (Director) Pratyaksh Vera Bhavan, 1/5-6, Manichandra Society, Ambawadi, Nr. Surdhara Circle, Thaltej, Ahmedabad- 380015 Ahmedabad- 380054 PAN:AAB CB8 696 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) ShriS. N. Divatia, AR Assessee by : Revenue by : ShriJames Kurien,Sr. DR सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date of Hea…