Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

2,356 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

A.K. Roy and Another v. Voltas Limited 8
3 SCC 503 · 1973 · Reported
26
citing judgments

The 'wholesale cash price' for levying excise duty must be based on transactions at arm's length. Prices charged to special or favoured buyers due to extra-commercial considerations do not qualify as the wholesale cash price.

CIT v. First Leasing Co. India Limited
304 ITR 67 · 2008 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Expenditure is allowable as revenue expenditure if it is incurred for the purposes of business.

M/s.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. ACIT
38 DTR 282 · 2010 · Reported
26
citing judgments

Section 14A of the Income-tax Act is not applicable to insurance businesses governed by specific provisions of Section 44 and Schedule 1. Profit on sale of investments by insurance companies is not taxable, especially after the deletion of sub-rule (b) of Rule 5 of the First Schedule.

CIT v. Bharti Hexacom Ltd.
458 ITR 593 · 2023 · Supreme Court
26
citing judgments

License fees paid for telecommunication services are amortizable under Section 35ABB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and are considered capital expenditure. However, the allowability of amortization for spectrum usage charges is distinct from license fees.

Dy. CST (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) v. Pio Food Packers
46 STC 63 · 1980 · Supreme Court
26
citing judgments

Processing of pineapple into pineapple slices, jam, squash, or juice is not considered "manufacture" if the product retains its original identity and character in the trade. The key test is whether the resulting article is regarded in the trade as a distinct and new commodity.

CIT v. Hindustan Organics Chemical Ltd.
48 Taxmann.com 421 · 2014 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Payments made towards employee's contribution for PF/ESIC before the due date of filing the return of income are allowable as deductions.

Quality Engineering & Software Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
52 Taxmann.com 515 · 2014 · ITAT
26
citing judgments

A forward contract entered into to protect against foreign currency fluctuations on consideration receivable for exports is not a speculative transaction, and provisions for losses on such derivative contracts are allowable expenditures.

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai and Another
7 SCC 421 · 2017 · Reported
26
citing judgments

The decision in Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. [2017] 7 SCC 421 is referred to in the context of the rule of consistency, particularly concerning the application of provisions related to income calculation and disallowances.

Devarsons Industries Pvt. Limited v. ACIT
84 Taxmann.com 244 · 2017 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Where the Assessing Officer has no option but to resort to the provisions of Rule 8D read with Section 14A, the disallowance can be made under Section 14A.

Indian Explosives Ltd. v. CIT
147 ITR 392 · 1984 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Where an assessee has sufficient own funds exceeding its investments, a presumption arises that investments were made out of interest-free funds, preventing disallowance of interest expenses.

Confederation of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry (SSI) v. CBDT
353 ITR 388 · 2013 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Payments made to doctors in violation of Indian Medical Council regulations are considered opposed to public policy and are not deductible as business expenditure under section 37(1). Such payments are to be discouraged.

CIT v. A.L. Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
374 ITR 609 · 2015 · High Court
26
citing judgments

An assessee is entitled to claim the benefit under Section 80IA(4)(i) even in the absence of a specific agreement with the Central/State Government, local authority or statutory body, if the proposal was accepted by the Government on certain conditions which were duly complied with.

CIT v. D. Chetan & Co.
390 ITR 36 · 2017 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Losses on foreign exchange forward contracts are not speculative if they are entered into to cover variations in foreign exchange rates impacting import/export business. Such losses are considered business losses and not notional.

Patnaik & Co. Ltd. v. CIT
161 ITR 365 · 1986 · Supreme Court
26
citing judgments

Losses arising from the sale of investments made for business purposes are treated as business losses, not capital losses.

CIT v. Travancore Titanium Products Ltd.
187 Taxmann 81 · 2010 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Expenditure directed by the Government to be incurred is allowable if the company has no discretion and is bound to comply with governmental orders. Prior period expenses are permissible in a mercantile system of accounting.

Rollatainers Ltd. v. CIT
339 ITR 54 · 2011 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Waiver of a loan taken for business purposes constitutes a remission or cessation of liability under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, making it taxable as business income under Section 28.

CIT v. Bank of India
218 ITR 371 · 2015 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Expenses arising from foreign exchange fluctuations on revenue expenditure and foreign currency loans for day-to-day business operations are notional or anticipated losses and are allowable.

M/s Unicorn Industries v. Union of India
2019 SCC OnLine SC 1567 · 2019 · Reported
26
citing judgments

While it has been contended that 'cess' is a tax, the specific issue in Unicorn Industries was not whether cess is deductible under Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. Instead, it concerned whether cess, education cess, higher education cess, and NCCD could be construed as 'duty of excise'.

My Home Power Ltd. v. DCIT
27 Taxmann.com 27 · 2012 · ITAT
26
citing judgments

The sale of certified emission reductions or carbon credits constitutes business income and is treated as trading receipts. This treatment is affirmed by considering the manufacturing process and is supported by a series of tribunal decisions.

Wall Street Construction Ltd. v. JCIT
101 ITD 156 · 2006 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

Deducting interest expenditure allocated project-wise and added to work-in-progress against income from other completed projects distorts profit calculation according to the project completion method.

448 ITR 674 (Delhi and Pr.CIT v. Oil Industry Development Board
103 Taxmann.com 325 · 2019 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act is not permissible if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year. This position is affirmed by the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition by the Supreme Court.

Chowranghee Sales Bureau Ltd. v. CIT
110 ITR 385 · 1977 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Sales tax is considered part of the trading receipt, and its non-payment can attract the provisions of Section 43B. The liability to pay sales tax arises at the moment of sale or purchase.

S.G. Mercantile Corporation v. CIT
113 ITR 712 · 1978 · High Court
25
citing judgments

An activity carried out continuously and in an organized manner with the purpose of earning profit constitutes business or trading activity, and income derived from such activity is considered business income. Expenses incurred to earn this income are deductible.

114 ITR 434 (CAL.); and (iv) Life Insurance Corporation of India v. CIT
119 ITR 900 · 1979 · High Court
25
citing judgments

The computation of profits for a life insurance business must follow a special, artificial mode prescribed in the First Schedule of the Income Tax Act, rather than the standard method for ordinary assessees.

Cemetile Industries v. ITO
145 Taxmann.com 209 · 2022 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

Where an assessee-employer deposits the employees' share of contribution towards provident fund and ESI beyond the statutory due dates, disallowance under section 36(1)(va) is justified, and such disallowance is a proper adjustment under section 143(1)(a).

289 (Delhi), Williamson Financial Services Ltd. v. CIT
166 Taxmann.com 607 · 2024 · Reported
25
citing judgments

The explanation inserted to Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2022, is prospective in nature and not retrospective.

CIT v. Bharat Carbon & Ribbon Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd.
239 ITR 505 · 1999 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Statutory liabilities, like customs duty, are deductible only in the year they are actually paid, regardless of the assessee's accounting method, as per Section 43B.

Fenner (India) Ltd. v. CIT
241 ITR 803 · 2000 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Income derived from scrap generated during the manufacturing process of an industrial undertaking is eligible for deduction under Section 80IB or 80IA of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Limited
245 ITR 384 · 2000 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Revaluation of closing stock including unused Modvat credit is permissible, and additions made on this account by the Assessing Officer can be deleted.

CIT v. Gem India Manufacturing Co.
249 ITR 307 · 2001 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Cutting and polishing of uncut raw diamonds does not constitute manufacturing or production of a new article or thing, as the raw diamonds remain diamonds after the process.

CIT v. Bechtel India (P) Ltd. (2 DTR (Del) 145)
269 ITR 290 · 2004 · High Court
25
citing judgments
CIT v. Leaders Valves (P) Ltd.
285 ITR 435 · 2006 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Purchases made by an assessee cannot be treated as bogus if consumption is fully proved, trading results have been accepted all along, and similar purchases from the same parties were accepted in subsequent assessment years.

CIT v. Associated Cables P. Ltd.
286 ITR 596 · 2006 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Retention money withheld by a contractee is not taxable in the year it is retained, but only in the year the obligations under the contract are fulfilled and the amount becomes due to the assessee.

Mazagaon Dock Limited v. JCIT
29 SOT 356 · 2009 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

Anticipated or foreseeable losses on fixed-price construction contracts are deductible in the year the loss is foreseen, aligning with accounting standards like AS-7. This approach is supported by decisions allowing deduction of foreseeable losses based on technical estimation.

CIT v. Relaxo Footwears Limited
293 ITR 231 · 2007 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Expenditures are revenue in nature and deserve to be allowed as deductions if they are for commercial expediency.

B.S. Patel v. Dy. CIT
326 ITR 457 · 2010 · High Court
25
citing judgments

An employer cannot claim a deduction for employee contributions to provident or welfare funds if they are not deposited by the prescribed due date under section 36(1)(va), even if deposited before the income tax return filing deadline under section 43B. The Supreme Court's decision in Alom Extrusions Ltd. is not applicable to employee contributions.

CIT v. United Colleries Ltd.
357 ITR 750 · 2013 · High Court
25
citing judgments

A credit to a lease equalization account based on a consistent accounting practice is relevant only for accounting purposes, not for determining taxable income.

Dunkerley & Co. v. State of Madras
5 STC 216 · 1954 · High Court
25
citing judgments

An ordinary case of trade involves buying goods with a view to selling them at a profit. Transactions on a large scale are considered commerce, and continuous repetition of such transactions constitutes business.

116 TAXMANN 606 (SC); Indian Molasses Co. (Private) Ltd. v. CIT
53 ITR 134 · 1964 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

A claim for a deduction or allowance must be made in the relevant assessment year. If an assessee fails to claim an amount in the correct year, it cannot be claimed in a subsequent year.

84 Taxmann.com 195 (SC) 3. Shoreline Hotel (P) Ltd. v. CIT
55 Taxmann.com 371 · 2015 · High Court
25
citing judgments
CIT v. Jagmohandas J. Kapadia
61 ITR 663 · 1966 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Expenditure is deductible under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act only if it is incurred solely for the purpose of making or earning dividend income.

Birla Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. v. CIT
64 ITR 568 · 1967 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Expenses incurred for the purpose of business, even if not directly generating immediate profits, are deductible if they serve to carry on the business and protect the assessee's interests. The assessee determines commercial expediency, not the tax authorities.

Smt.Sujata Grover v. DCIT
74 TTJ 347 · 2002 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

Foreign exchange gains are includible in profits eligible for deduction under sections 10A/10B of the Income Tax Act, as they represent a form of additional sales price arising from export turnover. The case also supports claims for deduction on export of computer software under section 80HHE.

Deputy CIT v. Haryana Oxygen Ltd.
76 ITD 32 · 2001 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

A company, being an inanimate entity, cannot have personal use of assets. Therefore, expenses incurred on assets used by a company cannot be disallowed on the ground of personal use by the company itself; such disallowance, if any, would be applicable to directors personally.

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. CTO
77 STC 182 · 1990 · High Court
25
citing judgments

The transfer of the right to use goods involves a transfer of possessory rights, including control over the goods, and is not merely about having custody or possession without effective control.

CIT v. Kuwer Fibers (P) Ltd.
77 Taxmann.com 345 · 2017 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Where purchases of raw material are made outside the books of account and the assessee cannot provide proper accounting or reconciliation, the value of the investment and estimated profits based on the GP rate must be adopted. Statements recorded, if corroborated by other materials, are valid even if they explain seized documents.

CIT v. Dhawan Investment and Trading Company Ltd.
238 ITR 486 · 1999 · High Court
25
citing judgments

A share loss claimed by an assessee is a genuine loss and eligible for deduction if the view taken by the Tribunal allowing it is not erroneous or perverse.

CIT v. Amrapali Jewels Pvt. Ltd.
65 DTR 196 · 2012 · High Court
25
citing judgments

When dealing with unverifiable purchases, tax authorities can invoke Section 145(3) but cannot make additions solely on that basis without considering the past history and current events of the case. The taxing authorities have the discretion to determine the appropriate GP rate, considering settled practices.

Liberty India v. Commissioner of Income Tax
9 SCC 328 · 2009 · Reported
25
citing judgments

DEPB/Duty Drawback schemes are considered export incentives and are distinct from reimbursements of costs. Entitlement to DEPB arises only after manufacturing and exporting a product, and is not directly related to the business of manufacturing or selling.

Consolidated Coffee Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
248 ITR 432 · 2001 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Expenses are to be apportioned among various units based on turnover, a method approved by the Supreme Court. The method of allocating exempt income by way of dividends to total gross revenue is also upheld.