1. CIT v. Dhoomketu Builders & Development (P.) Ltd.

34 Taxmann.com 18High Court2013#4754 most cited

What is 1. CIT v. Dhoomketu Builders & Development (P.) Ltd. authority for?

A business is considered set-up if the assessee can commence business activities, such as participating in a tender to acquire land for development. Expenditures incurred for such initial business activities can be treated as business expenditure.

25

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2014 to 2023.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Dhoomketu Builders & Development · business set-up · commencement of business · tender participation · real estate development · allowable expenditure · pre-operative expenditure · Section 37

Judgments citing 1. CIT v. Dhoomketu Builders & Development (P.) Ltd.

MESSUNG SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 14 (4),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 683/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.683/Pun/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 Messung Systems Private Vs. Ito, Ward-14(4), Pune. Limited, 501, Lunkad Skyvista, Sr. No.230/A/3/2, Viman Nagar, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aabcm1832E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani Date Of Hearing : 29.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.11.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Pune [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 15.02.2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Company Incorporated Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956. It Is Engaged In The Business Of Trading Of Programmable Logic Controllers (Plc) & Parts Thereof. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Was Filed On 30.09.2014 Declaring Total

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.683/PUN/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 Messung Systems Private Vs. ITO, Ward-14(4), Pune. Limited, 501, Lunkad Skyvista, Sr. No.230/A/3/2, Viman Nagar, Pune- 411014. PAN : AABCM1832E Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue by : Shri M. G. Jasnani Date of hearing : 29.08.2022 Date of pronouncement : 07.11.2022 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against t…

DCIT CEN CIR 2(3), MUMBAI vs. HAGWOOD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 1540/MUM/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Feb 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1306/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13) M/S Hagwood Commercial Acit, Cc -13, बनाम/ Developers Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo, V. 105/106, Provogue House, M.K. Road, Off. New Link Road, Churchgate, Andheri (West), Mumbai. Mumbai – 400 053. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aabch7508Q (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Dr. Santosh Mankaskar,DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “H” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1306/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13) M/s Hagwood Commercial ACIT, CC -13, बनाम/ Developers Pvt. Ltd., Old CGO, v. 105/106, Provogue House, M.K. Road, Off. New Link Road, Churchgate, Andheri (West), Mumbai. Mumbai – 400 053. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AABCH7508Q (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1540/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13) DCIT, CC -2(3)…

Showing 120 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

1. CIT v. Dhoomketu Builders & Development (P.) Ltd. (34 Taxmann.com 18) — Cited in 25 Judgments | BharatTax