Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

1,377 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Hasimara Industries Ltd. v. CIT
231 ITR 842 · 1998 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

An assessee cannot claim amounts written off as bad debts if they were not previously treated as income. Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) prohibits such claims.

CIT v. Gujarat Guardian Ltd.
222 CTR 526 · 2009 · High Court
25
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer cannot question the necessity or benefit of an expenditure if the assessee provides evidence to prove the rendering of services justifying the payment, especially in relation to commission.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Central Bank of India
232 Taxmann 396 · 2015 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by a company to maintain its status as a company, rather than for earning specific income like dividends, cannot be allocated for disallowance under Section 14A.

Mewar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. CIT
3 SCC 143 · 1973 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Recurring payments for the use of an asset are revenue expenditure and not the acquisition price of an asset. Such fees paid are allowable as revenue expenditure.

CIT v. Oxford University Press
108 ITR 166 · 1977 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Expenditure on repairs is revenue in nature if it preserves or maintains an existing asset, rather than creating a new asset or advantage. The duration of the benefit from repairs does not determine if the expenditure is capital.

CIT v. Karnal Cooperative Sugar Mills
118 Taxmann 489 · 2001 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Interest income earned by an assessee on funds parked in FDRs is an integral part of its business income and cannot be distinguished from its core business activities.

Sarnath Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
120 TTJ 216 · 2009 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Surplus arising on redemption of mutual funds, which are surrendered to the fund and not traded, cannot be considered as business income. The intention of the assessee at the time of purchase of shares or other items, as reflected in the books of account, is a key factor in determining whether transactions are in the nature of trade or investment.

Trib.) (v) Flying Fabrication v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
133 Taxmann.com 84 · 2021 · High Court
24
citing judgments

The amendment to Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act made by the Finance Act, 2021, is prospective in nature, meaning payments made before the amendment are not affected by its retrospective application.

Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (
134 ITD 269 · 2011 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

A joint venture or consortium formed solely to obtain government contracts, where the work is executed by the constituent members as per mutually agreed terms, is valid. The ITAT appropriately appreciated evidence in allowing the assessee's claim.

DCIT v. DBM Geotechnics and Construction (P.) Ltd.
136 Taxmann.com 345 · 2022 · Reported
24
citing judgments

A 100% disallowance for bogus purchases is not justified if the assessee's sales figures are not doubted and the inability to produce suppliers is the sole basis for adverse inference, especially when purchases were made in the grey market.

CIT v. Hindustan General Industries Ltd.
137 ITR 851 · 1982 · High Court
24
citing judgments

The transfer of assets from an existing unit to a new unit does not automatically attract Section 15C(2)(ii) if the value of the transferred assets is less than twenty percent of the total value of assets of the new unit. This decision clarifies when a new unit's operations are considered distinct from an old unit's operations.

Hawkins Cookers Ltd. v. ITO
14 DTR 206 · 2008 · Reported
24
citing judgments

Where an assessee follows the procedure laid down by the ICAI and the Tax Auditor reports in Clause 12(b) of Form 3CD that no adjustment is required under Section 145A, CENVAT credit need not be added to closing stock.

CIT v. T.S.Hajee Moosa & Co.
153 ITR 422 · 1985 · High Court
24
citing judgments

For an expenditure to be deductible under Section 37(1), the motive behind it must be solely for promoting the business, not merely for personal or other indirect benefits.

Agilent Technologies (International) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
160 Taxmann.com 238 · 2024 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure cannot be claimed as a deduction under Section 80G because it is a statutory mandate and lacks the voluntariness required for donations. This principle applies even when CSR contributions are made to funds like the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund or other eligible charitable institutions.

CIT v. E-Funds International India
162 Taxmann 1 · 2007 · High Court
24
citing judgments

An assessee is considered to have commenced business in a relevant previous year if it has taken all necessary steps to obtain business, including marketing efforts, even if no revenue has been earned yet. The Assessing Officer cannot disallow a claim of loss on the grounds that business had not commenced if these steps have been taken.

Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. v. CIT
175 ITR 220 · 1989 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Expenditure on constructing a road on government land, though conferring an enduring advantage to facilitate business operations efficiently and profitably, is not capital in nature if it does not result in acquiring a tangible or intangible asset for the assessee.

Moti Lal Chhadami Lal Jain v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi and Ors.
190 ITR 1 · 1991 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Income diverted at source by an overriding title, such as for R&R plans of mining areas, is not taxable as the assessee's income.

CIT v. Bata India Ltd.
201 ITR 884 · 1993 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Contributions made by an assessee to local festivals and community celebrations are allowable as business expenditure if they are necessary for the smooth running of the business.

CIT vs. New India Industries Ltd., 204 ITR 208 (Gujarat) (v) CIT v. Mafatlal Gangabhai and Company Pvt. Ltd.
219 ITR 644 · 1996 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which deals with benefits or perquisites in the course of business, is only applicable when such benefit or perquisite is received in a non-monetary form. Monetary amounts cannot be assessed under this section.

CIT v. Sirpur Paper Mills
237 ITR 41 · 1999 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Deduction for contributions made to an approved superannuation fund within the prescribed limits is fully allowed in the assessment year in which the payment is made. The deduction permitted by law cannot be restricted under the pretext of imposing an additional condition.

CIT v. Ooty Dasaprakash
237 ITR 902 · 1999 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on repairs, modernization, and replacement of existing building components, furniture, and fittings for a hotel business is considered revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. The construction of a building on leasehold land can also be treated as revenue expenditure.

CIT v. Ramaraji Surgical Cotton Mills
294 ITR 328 · 2007 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on the replacement of a part of machinery is deductible as revenue expenditure if it does not result in an increase in productivity or capacity.

Housing Society Limited and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others
3 SCC 323 · 1970 · Reported
24
citing judgments

Receipts from activities undertaken by statutory bodies for public purpose are not per se business or commercial receipts, but the Assessing Officer must scrutinize them to determine if consideration charged is significantly higher than cost, indicating trade or business.

Madras in Tamilnadu Magnesite Ltd. v. DCIT
303 ITR 71 · Reported
24
citing judgments

The Income Tax Department can make a prima facie adjustment to taxable income under Section 143(1)(a) when an amount is inadmissible due to Section 43B overriding Section 36(1). This adjustment is permissible as Section 43B takes precedence over Section 36(1).

V.K.J Builders and Contractors P Ltd. v. CIT
318 ITR 204 · 2009 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

The closing stock of an earlier accounting year must form the opening stock of the subsequent accounting year. This principle is applied when assessing total income, particularly concerning the valuation of stock.

Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. Addl. CIT
39 SOT 17 · 2010 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for bringing goodwill to the assessee or for promoting the business is allowable as a deduction.

MCTM Corpn. (P) Ltd. (1996)2 SCC 471, JK Industries Ltd. v. Chief Inspector of Factors & Boilers
4 SCC 98 · 1999 · Reported
24
citing judgments

Subsidies received by an assessee from the government, intended to reimburse costs incurred in manufacturing and selling products, are considered profits and gains derived from the business for the purpose of deductions under sections 80-IB and 80-IC.

DCIT v. Chandabhoy & Jassobhoy
49 SOT 448 · 2012 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Section 40(a)(ia) is not applicable where tax has been deducted at source, even if at a lower rate than required, due to a difference in opinion regarding the nature of the payment.

Unique Enterprises v. ITO
5 ITD 495 · 1983 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

The percentage of completion method for recognizing income is a relevant method in tax assessments. Courts and tribunals have considered its applicability, particularly in construction and real estate contexts.

Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. CIT (SC)
79 ITR 514 · 1971 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

Penalties paid for violation of law are not allowable as a deduction. Such penalties are opposed to public policy.

CIT v. Sharda Real Estate (P) Ltd.
99 DTR 100 · 2014 · High Court
24
citing judgments

When additions are made to income based on unaccounted sales, only the profit attributable to such sales can be taxed, not the entire sale proceeds. The Assessing Officer may be directed to estimate income based on a specific percentage of cash sale proceeds.

Subramaniam Bros. v. CIT
258 ITR 306 · 2002 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on the higher education or training of a director's son or daughter abroad is not allowable as a business deduction if it does not pertain to the assessee's business and lacks a direct business connection.

Mudhit Madanlal Gupta v. ACIT
51 DTR 217 · 2011 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Subsidies received for the purpose of accelerating industrial development and creating employment are considered capital receipts. This is determined by applying the purposive test to ascertain the object for which the subsidy was granted.

Velankani Information Systems Ltd. v. DCIT
97 Taxmann.com 599 · 2018 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Interest paid on delayed remittances of service tax is compensatory in nature and not a penalty hit by the Explanation to Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, making it a allowable business expenditure.

Hi-tech India Pvt. Ltd. v. UoI
129 Taxmann 709 · 2003 · High Court
24
citing judgments

The employer's responsibility for timely payment of employees' contribution to provident fund remains even if wages are paid in the succeeding month. Belated remittance of employees' contribution to the provident fund is not eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.

DIT v. OHM Ltd.
352 ITR 406 · 2013 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Income from services rendered in connection with the extraction and production of mineral oils is taxable under section 44BB, as it is a specific provision that overrides general provisions.

CIT v. Vegetable Products
188 ITR 192 · 1972 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

If there are two reasonable interpretations of a taxing statute, the interpretation that favors the assessee must be adopted.

CIT v. S.S.P. (P) Ltd.
202 Taxmann 386 · 2011 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Ad hoc disallowances made without material to justify them or pointing out deficiencies in the assessee's claim are not justified. This applies to expenses like car and telephone expenses which cannot be disallowed merely on an estimate basis.

CIT v. Chipsoft Technology (P.) Ltd.
210 Taxmann 173 · 2012 · High Court
24
citing judgments

A trading liability that becomes time-barred, such as unpaid employee dues outstanding for many years, is considered a cessation of liability under Section 41(1) and must be added to the assessee's income.

CIT v. Banjara 44. Developers & Constructions (P.) Ltd.
117 Taxmann.com 747 · 2020 · High Court
24
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer cannot arbitrarily change an assessee's consistently followed completed contract method of accounting, which has been accepted by revenue authorities in the past, and determine income on an estimate basis.

CIT v. Velankani Information Systems (P.) Ltd.
265 CTR 250 · 2014 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Income from letting out a property along with its amenities is assessable as business income, not income from house property, when the agreements for letting and services are entered into contemporaneously with the intention to enjoy the entire property as a whole for business purposes.

Teja Construction v. ACIT
129 TTJ 57 · 2010 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Where the Assessing Officer rejects the books of accounts and estimates the income, no further addition can be made for irregularities, as this would amount to double taxation.

Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. D. V. Bapat, ITO
101 ITR 292 · 1975 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Amounts paid towards an unapproved gratuity fund are deductible as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even though they may not be allowable under Section 36(1)(v).

Geekay Security Services Private Limited v. DCIT
101 Taxmann.com 192 · 2019 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Deduction for employee's contribution to PF/ESI under section 36(1)(va) is allowable if paid after the due date under the respective act but before the due date of filing the income tax return.

West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax
103 ITD 19 · 2006 · ITAT
23
citing judgments

A DG Unit generating power for captive consumption is eligible for deduction under section 80-IA.

CIT v. Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd.
112 ITR 734 · 1978 · High Court
23
citing judgments

A deduction not claimed before the Income-tax Officer is not necessarily fatal, as a claim can be made in a bona fide manner at any stage before a competent higher authority if the liability arises.

MotilalHirabaiSpng.And Wvg. Co. Ltd., (1978) 113 ITR 173 (GUJ); Bharat Development (P.)Ltd. v. CIT
133 ITR 471 · 1982 · Reported
23
citing judgments

The term 'business' encompasses any occupation or duty requiring attention, continuously carried on for the purpose of profit, and is a broader concept than 'trade'.

FNF India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
133 Taxmann.com 251 · 2021 · ITAT
23
citing judgments

Donations made for corporate social responsibility (CSR) expenses, if disallowed under Section 37(1), are eligible for deduction under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act.

36 Taxmann.com 523 3. Plastiblends India Ltd. v. Addl.CIT
138 Taxmann.com 416 · 2022 · High Court
23
citing judgments

An assessee is not eligible for a deduction under Section 80IB(10) if such deduction was not claimed in the original return of income, even if a claim was sought to be admitted based on a Supreme Court decision.

Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT
145 Taxmann.com 331 · 2022 · High Court
23
citing judgments

The assessee is entitled to claim a deduction under section 80M of the Act for dividend income received from shares, where such income was chargeable to tax in their hands.