Landmark Cases on Business Income and Deductions

1,377 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

M/s Liberty India Vs. CIT 225 CTR 233(SC), CIT v. Sterling Foods
227 ITR 557 · 1997 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Interest income earned from mandatory investments made as a condition of carrying on a business, such as for a contingency reserve under the Electricity (Supply) Act, is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA as it is intrinsically linked to the business activity.

CIT v. Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd.
24 ITR 551 · 1953 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

A mutual concern may be held to carry on a business or trade with its members, even if the surplus from such trade is not considered income or profit. The court adopted a stricter approach in applying the principle of mutuality, emphasizing the identity of contributors and recipients.

ITO v. Anand Builders
265 ITR 37 · Reported
32
citing judgments

The profit from on-money receipts can be estimated. The Ahmedabad Tribunal had estimated this at 8%, which was upheld by the Gujarat High Court, and the Supreme Court dismissed the revenue's SLP in the case of ITO v. Anand Builders.

CIT v. Shivam Motors
272 CTR 277 · 2014 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act cannot be made in the absence of any tax-free income earned by the assessee.

TN Power Finance and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. v. JCIT
280 ITR 491 · 2006 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines cannot override the statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act. Provisions of the Income Tax Act prevail over RBI directives.

DCIT v. Core Healthcare Ltd.
308 ITR 263 · 2009 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Expenditure capitalized as tangible/know-how/brand development that is revenue in nature can be claimed as a revenue expense in a revised return, with depreciation claimed thereon being consequently reduced.

Limited v. CIT: 159 ITR 673, CIT v. Berger Paints (India) Ltd. (254 ITR 503), CIT v. Salora International (
335 ITR 196 · 2011 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Expenditure on advertisement and sales promotion is revenue in nature and allowable as a business expenditure under Section 37(1). The revenue cannot insist on deferring such expenses without statutory backing.

TejaConstrcution v. ACIT
39 SOT 13 · 2010 · ITAT
32
citing judgments

The net profit rate of 7% applied by the CIT(A) was justified for a sub-contractor who earned profit from contract works.

Koya and Co. Construction (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
51 SOT 203 · 2012 · ITAT
32
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 80IA is available to developers who undertake entrepreneurial and investment risk in infrastructure development, not to contractors who only undertake business risk.

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab v. Lahore Electric Supply Co. Ltd.
60 ITR 1 · 1966 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

The mere fact that a company has not gone into liquidation does not establish an intention to continue business, particularly if there is no intention to resume it. The court's conclusion about the closure of business hinges on the absence of an intention to resume operations.

Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd. v. GV Chand ITO
61 ITR 493 · 1966 · High Court
32
citing judgments

The manufacture of mineral oil includes mineral oil obtained by a refining process from crude oil. The expression 'mineral oil' should not be understood in a limited sense referring only to raw materials.

Trib.) 14. Nuzivedu Swati Coastal Consortium v. ITO
62 Taxmann.com 258 · 2015 · Reported
32
citing judgments

The tribunal considered the issue of deductibility of employees' contribution to PF and similar funds, particularly in relation to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B(b).

R.Ji. Sett Mooichaiul Sugastchand v. CIT, New Delhi
86 ITR 647 · 1972 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for acquiring mining rights to win and extract minerals from the earth is capital in nature, while expenditure for acquiring already-won minerals on the surface, considered stock-in-trade, is revenue expenditure.

Council), V.Damodaran v. CIT Kerala 64 ITR 26(Ker.), Champion Engineering Works Ltd. v. CIT
87 ITR 650 · 1973 · High Court
32
citing judgments

The elimination of competition does not necessarily need to be simultaneous with the acquisition of a business for a payment to be considered for the enduring benefit of the business. The court considers the overall arrangement and purpose of the payment.

Pr. CIT v. Hind Filter Ltd.
90 Taxmann.com 51 · 2018 · High Court
32
citing judgments

An employee's contribution to provident fund and ESI deposited before the due date of filing the return is allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B.

PCIT- 7 v. Tally Solutions (P.) Ltd.) (
123 Taxmann.com 21 · 2021 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Amounts referred to under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are not deductible in computing income chargeable under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession'.

CIT v. CHD Developers Ltd.
362 ITR 177 · 2014 · High Court
32
citing judgments

A housing project approved before the amendment to Section 80IB(10) in 2005 is not subject to the conditions introduced by that amendment, such as the requirement for a completion certificate, if the assessee was not otherwise obligated to produce it.

CIT v. Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.
274 ITR 465 · 2005 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, as stipulated in Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, is allowable as a deduction. This applies even if the expenditure is for deposits made due to commercial exigency and fulfills obligations under other statutes.

CIT v. Wolkem India Ltd.
315 ITR 211 · 2009 · High Court
32
citing judgments

The provision for obsolescence of finished goods and spares is permissible. The issue relates to the allowance of provision for obsolescence of finished goods and spares.

CIT v. Koshika Telecom Ltd.
287 ITR 479 · 2006 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Ad hoc disallowances cannot be made without basis, and the assessee's claim must be accepted if books of account are not rejected. Income from FDRs is considered business income if inextricably linked to business activities, such as providing security for a letter of credit.

CIT & Anr. v. S.K. Srigiri And Bros.
298 ITR 13 · 2008 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Income declared during a survey under section 133A is to be treated as business income, and section 115BBE will not apply to such income.

Sarabhai Management Corporation Ltd. v. CIT
102 ITR 25 · 1976 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Business commencement is marked by the first activity undertaken to acquire immovable property, and expenses incurred during the interval between business setup and commencement are deductible.

Blaze & Central (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax
120 ITR 33 · 1979 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Payments made to ward off business rivalry or acquire an existing business are capital in nature. This is especially true if the benefit obtained is for a specified period and involves the acquisition of business in a specified area.

PCIT v. Strides Arcolab Ltd.
147 Taxmann.com 202 · 2023 · Supreme Court
31
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 36(1)(va) for employee's contributions to PF/ESI, even if not deposited within the stipulated time, is deleted if the Tribunal's finding is correct.

Nileshwar Rangekallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham v. CIT
152 Taxmann.com 347 · 2023 · High Court
31
citing judgments

A claim for deduction under section 80P must be made in a valid return filed within the timelines prescribed by the Act (prior to April 1, 2018, this included sections 139(1), 139(4), 142(1), or 148; post-amendment, only section 139(1) is accepted). Statutory benefits like this deduction require strict adherence to legal conditions.

Trib.) DCIT v. Kohinoor Foods Ltd.
177 Taxmann.com 836 · 2025 · Reported
31
citing judgments

Where the issue of bogus purchases is contentious, courts may allow a lumpsum disallowance of 5% of alleged bogus purchases as a reasonable measure, provided it is not treated as a precedent.

Girdharilal Goenka v. CIT
179 ITR 122 · 1989 · High Court
31
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer should exercise discretion under Section 40A(3) by considering business expediency, surrounding circumstances, and the facts of each case, balancing legal requirements with assessee hardship, rather than relying solely on Board circulars.

Calcutta in Indian Steel and Wire Products Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income
208 ITR 740 · 1994 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Compensatory interest paid for delayed payment of an annual license fee is a revenue expense that must be expensed off, as it does not result in the creation of a capital asset or right.

Harshad J.Choksi v. CIT, Bombay City- VII
25 Taxmann.com 567 · 2012 · High Court
31
citing judgments

The conditions for claiming a bad debt deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2) are not fulfilled if the assessee fails to provide details of the parties associated with the debts or evidence that these amounts were offered to tax in earlier years. An alternate claim for loss under Section 28 is denied without evidence substantiating the loss in the relevant assessment year.

Shri Ramalinga ChoodambikaMills Ltd. v. CIT
28 ITR 952 · 1955 · High Court
31
citing judgments

The Income Tax Department cannot assess the difference between the market price and the actual sale price as profit if sales are bona fide and not sham, even if goods are sold at a concessional rate.

210 (Del.), CIT v. M/s Excel Fashion Pvt. Ltd. (201
292 ITR 345 · 2007 · High Court
31
citing judgments

For a bad debt to be allowed as a write-off, it is sufficient for the assessee to establish that the debt has been written off in its books of accounts, as per Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Enterprising Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner
293 ITR 437 · 2007 · Supreme Court
31
citing judgments

Compensation received is revenue in nature and an admissible deduction.

Saroj Kumar Mazumdar v. CIT
37 ITR 242 · 1959 · Supreme Court
31
citing judgments

An isolated transaction, even if not part of the assessee's regular business, can be considered an adventure in the nature of trade if it bears clear indicia of trade. The fact that a transaction is not in the ordinary course of business does not change its character.

Pr. CIT v. HSBC Invest Direct (India) Ltd.
421 ITR 125 · 2020 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenditure incurred to earn exempt income under Section 14A cannot exceed the amount of exempt income earned.

1 ITR 754 (SC) Avery India Ltd. vs. CIT (1993) 199 ITR 754 (Cal) M.K. Bros. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
62 ITR 566 · 1966 · Supreme Court
31
citing judgments

The distinction between capital and revenue expenditure is subtle, requiring a case-by-case analysis of facts and the application of appropriate legal tests to determine the nature of an expenditure.

CIT v. Ashok Leyland Ltd.
86 ITR 549 · 1972 · Supreme Court
31
citing judgments

CIT v. Ashok Leyland Ltd. is authority for the proposition that expenditures can be considered revenue expenditures and eligible for deduction.

L.Ve. Vairavan Chettiar v. CIT
72 ITR 114 · 1969 · High Court
31
citing judgments

A business concern can still be considered to be carrying on its business even if there are long intervals of inactivity, provided it is kept alive, retains its registered office, and holds meetings. It is not necessary for a business to have work constantly to be considered in existence.

DIA v. Oman International Bank
313 ITR 128 · 2009 · High Court
31
citing judgments

A company is not required to prove that a debt has become bad to claim a deduction; writing off the debt as irrecoverable in the company's accounts is sufficient, especially after the amendment of Section 36(1)(vii) from April 1, 1989.

Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT
332 ITR 42 · 2011 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Section 80IA(9A) applies only at the stage of allowing deduction, not at the computation stage. Combined deductions under Section 80IA and 80HHC cannot exceed the gross total income.

Coforge Limited v. ACIT
436 ITR 546 · 2021 · High Court
31
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer (AO) must examine the assessee's accounts and be satisfied with the correctness of the expenditure claimed to have been incurred for earning income not forming part of the total income before making any disallowance under Section 14A.

PCIT v. S.V. Jiwani
145 Taxmann.com 230 · 2022 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Where purchases are found to be bogus or accommodation entries, the entire purchase amount cannot be added as income; only the profit element embedded therein should be treated as income, as the assessee would have necessarily procured materials to execute works.

CIT v. Samsung India Electronics Ltd.
356 ITR 354 · 2013 · High Court
31
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred before commencement of business is deductible if the business has been set up, meaning the assessee is ready to commence operations, even if no commercial activity has begun.

CIT v. Carborandum Universal Ltd.
149 ITR 759 · 1984 · High Court
31
citing judgments

An assessee has the right to change its method of accounting, even if the new method is detrimental to revenue, provided the change is bona fide and consistently applied.

Sultan Brothers Pvt Ltd. v. CIT
114 ITR 388 · 1978 · High Court
30
citing judgments

The decision in Sultan Brothers Pvt Ltd. v. CIT is cited as authority for treating a company as eligible business expenditure. This indicates that expenses related to a company can be considered deductible business expenses.

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. CIT
115 ITR 45 · 1978 · High Court
30
citing judgments

The assessment of profits for insurance companies is governed by specific rules within schedules, and the Assessing Officer (AO) cannot make adjustments if Section 44 has been invoked. Insurance businesses may be entitled to exemptions under Section 10(15) even when Section 44 applies, as Section 44 does not exclude such claims.

38(Bom); Essilor India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
137 Taxmann.com 60 · 2022 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed when the assessee has sufficient interest-free funds, even if the funds are mixed, as investments yielding tax-free income are presumed to be made out of such funds.

J., in State of Andhra Pradesh v. H. Abdul Bakshi& Bros.
15 STC 644 · 1964 · Supreme Court
30
citing judgments

A person is considered to be engaged in business if they are involved in buying, selling, or supplying goods, and the term 'business' in taxing statutes refers to an occupation or profession that occupies the person's time and attention.

Cooper Corporation Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT
159 ITD 165 · 2016 · ITAT
30
citing judgments

The restatement of borrowings, excluding those used for importing machinery, should be allowed as a revenue reduction.

Mather & Platt (India) Ltd. v. CIT
168 ITR 493 · 1987 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Deduction for commission payments cannot be disallowed solely because summons served on commission agents were returned unserved, especially if the agents may have moved addresses years after the transactions.

CIT v. HMT Ltd.
19 ITR 425 · High Court
30
citing judgments