38(Bom); Essilor India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

137 Taxmann.com 60High Court2022#3906 most cited

What is 38(Bom); Essilor India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT authority for?

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed when the assessee has sufficient interest-free funds, even if the funds are mixed, as investments yielding tax-free income are presumed to be made out of such funds.

30

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Essilor India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT · section 14A · section 40(a)(ia) · interest expenditure · disallowance · interest-free funds · mixed funds · tax-free investments

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 38(Bom); Essilor India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT

DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM vs. ANDHRA PAPER LIMITED, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 189/VIZ/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos. 162/Viz/2022 & 189/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Andhra Paper Limited Tax, Circle-1, (M/S. International Paper Rajamahendravaram. Appm Ltd), Sri Ram Nagar, Rajamahendravaram. Pan: Aact 8849 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) Co Nos: 22 & 23/Viz/2022 (In आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos. 162/Viz/2022 & 189/Viz/2022) ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) M/S. Andhra Paper Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of (M/S. International Paper Appm Income Tax, Circle-1, Ltd), Rajamahendravaram. Sri Ram Nagar, Rajamahendravaram. Pan: Aact 8849 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri K. Chakrapani ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri K. ChakrapaniFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35D

…recorded by the Ld. AO regarding suo motto disallowance, any further disallowance by the Ld. AO on the interest amount is not valid in law. The Ld. AR relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Essilor India (P.) Ltd vs. DCIT [137 Taxmann.com 60 (Karnataka). He therefore pleaded that the order of the Ld. CIT (A)-NFAC be upheld. 14. We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record and the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities. Admittedly, the Ld. AO has failed to record his satisfaction that the claim made by the assessee regarding the suo motto disallowa…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM vs. ANDHRA PAPER LIMITED, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 162/VIZ/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos. 162/Viz/2022 & 189/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Andhra Paper Limited Tax, Circle-1, (M/S. International Paper Rajamahendravaram. Appm Ltd), Sri Ram Nagar, Rajamahendravaram. Pan: Aact 8849 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) Co Nos: 22 & 23/Viz/2022 (In आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos. 162/Viz/2022 & 189/Viz/2022) ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) M/S. Andhra Paper Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of (M/S. International Paper Appm Income Tax, Circle-1, Ltd), Rajamahendravaram. Sri Ram Nagar, Rajamahendravaram. Pan: Aact 8849 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri K. Chakrapani ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri K. ChakrapaniFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35D

…recorded by the Ld. AO regarding suo motto disallowance, any further disallowance by the Ld. AO on the interest amount is not valid in law. The Ld. AR relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Essilor India (P.) Ltd vs. DCIT [137 Taxmann.com 60 (Karnataka). He therefore pleaded that the order of the Ld. CIT (A)-NFAC be upheld. 14. We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record and the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities. Admittedly, the Ld. AO has failed to record his satisfaction that the claim made by the assessee regarding the suo motto disallowa…

Showing 120 of 30 · Page 1 of 2