SUZLON ENERGY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that goodwill created as a result of amalgamation is a depreciable asset, as it came into existence due to the amalgamation itself, not a transfer of an existing asset. The Tribunal also noted that amendments to Section 32, effective from AY 2021-22, do not apply to the assessment years in question.
What were the facts?
The assessee company claimed depreciation on goodwill arising from an amalgamation. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this claim, arguing that goodwill is not a depreciable asset and the provisions regarding transfer of assets in amalgamation applied. The assessee also suo motu disallowed a small amount under Section 14A, but the AO made a larger disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation is allowable on goodwill created as a result of amalgamation, and whether disallowance under Section 14A is applicable to book profits computed under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing91 Taxmann.com 154 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing317 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders956 citing208 Taxmann 498 · 2012 · HC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT657 citing255 ITR 273 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.579 citing223 Taxmann 130 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd.543 citing326 ITR 1 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing348 ITR 302 · 2012 · SC
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing10 SCC 153 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P.) Ltd.421 citing95 Taxmann.com 250 · 2018 · SC
- CIT v. Rajendra Prasad Moody386 citing115 ITR 519 · 1978 · SC
- CIT v. Winsome Textile Industries Ltd.378 citing319 ITR 204 · 2009 · HC
- Redington (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT370 citing77 Taxmann.com 257 · 2017 · HC
- PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.354 citing141 Taxmann.com 289 · 2022 · HC
- Sedco Forex International Drill. Inc. v. CIT285 citing12 SCC 717 · 2005 · SC · Read judgment
- Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar263 citing8 SCC 24 · 2001
- Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar, (2001) 8 SCC 24 (para 44); Brij Mohan Das Laxman Das v. CIT261 citing5 SCC 482 · 1997 · SC
- PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd.255 citing84 Taxmann.com 186 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Godavari Devi Saraf235 citing113 ITR 589 · 1978 · HC
- Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India229 citing155 ITR 120 · 1985 · SC
- Reliance Jute and Industries Ltd. v. CIT214 citing1 SCC 139 · 1980 · Read judgment
- Sonia Bhatia v. State of U.P190 citing2 SCC 585 · 1981
- SedcoForexInternational Drill. Inc. v. CIT186 citing10 SCC 165 · 2000
- CIT v. S.G. Pgnatale181 citing124 ITR 391 · 1980 · HC
- CIT v. Shivam Motors (P.) Ltd.179 citing230 Taxmann 63 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Microlabs Ltd.175 citing383 ITR 490 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc.145 citing226 Taxmann 45 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH
Before: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar
PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- These cross appeals are filed by the Assessee and the Revenue as against separate appellate orders both dated
2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short refe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026