Which sections of the Income Tax Act does PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd. come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 14A, Section 143(3), Section 8D, Section 115JB, Section 43B, Section 253(3).

PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd.

Q: How many judgments cite PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd.?

200 judgments on BharatTax cite PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd. (84 Taxmann.com 186), spanning 2017 to 2026.

84 Taxmann.com 186High Court2017#462 most cited

What is PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd. authority for?

Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not permissible where the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant assessment year. A CBDT Circular cannot override the express provisions of Section 14A read with Rule 8D to mandate such a disallowance.

200

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd. · Section 14A disallowance · Rule 8D · no exempt income · CBDT Circular 05/2014 · expenditure for exempt income · hypothetical income · Income-tax Act 1961 Section 14A · Delhi High Court

Also reported as

399 ITR 483250 Taxmann 174

Sections most often in play

Section 14A Section 143(3)Section 8D Section 115JB Section 43B Section 253(3)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

Issues it is cited on

section 9(1)(ii)section 80ab section 14a disallowance section 73 clarificatory amendment disallowance under section 14a scheme of arrangement section 115jb(2)disallowance u/s 14a section 14a(2)strategic investment disallowance of interest expenditure

Judgments citing PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd.

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(3), AHMEDABAD vs. INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1842/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaasst. Commissioner Of M/S. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Vs. Income-Tax, Corporate House, S.G. Highway, Central Circle 2(3), Nr. Sola Bridge, Thaltej, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380 054 [Pan : Aaaci 5120 L] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant Represented By : Shri Sher Singh, Cit (Dr) Respondent Represented By: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Ms. Urvashi Sodhan, Ar Date Of Hearing 07.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2026 O R D E R Per Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble:-

Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Asst. Commissioner of M/s. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Vs. Income-tax, Corporate House, S.G. Highway, Central Circle 2(3), Nr. Sola Bridge, Thaltej, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380 054 [PAN : AAACI 5120 L] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant represented by : Shri Sher Singh, CIT (DR) Respondent represented by: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Ms. Urvashi Sodhan, AR Date of Hearing 07.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement 24.02.2026 O R D E R PER MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE,…

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1084/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Sourabh Soparkar, Advocate Represented by Department : Dr. Narendra Kumar NFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR Date of Conclusion of Hearing : 11/11/2025

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad 'B' Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Manjunatha G., Accountant Member and Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member (Hybrid Hearing) INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS./I.T.A. NO.1083/HYD/2024 (Assessment Year:2017-18) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(1), Hyderabad. (Appellant) VS. Penna Cement Industries Limited, Hyderabad. PAN: AABCP2290D (Respondent) INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS./I.T.A. NO.1084/HYD/2024 (Assessment Year:2018-19) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(1), Hyderabad. (Appellant) VS. Penna Cement Industries Limited, Hyderabad. PAN: AABCP2290D (Respondent) Repr…

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1083/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Sood(Hybrid Hearing) आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1083/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष/ Assessment Year:2017-18) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5(1), Hyderabad. (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) Vs. Penna Cement Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aabcp2290D (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Industries आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1084/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष/ Assessment Year:2018-19) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5(1), Hydeabad. (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) Vs. Penna Cement Industries Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aabcp2290D (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) करदाताकाप्रतिनिधित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Sourabh Soparkar, Advocate राजस्वकाप्रतिनिधित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit-Dr सुनवाईसमाप्तहोनेकीतिथि/ Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing : 11/11/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/ Date Of Pronouncement : 21/01/2026 2

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad 'B' Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Manjunatha G., Accountant Member and Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member (Hybrid Hearing) आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1083/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष/ Assessment Year:2017-18) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(1), Hyderabad. (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) VS. Penna Cement Limited, Hyderabad. PAN: AABCP2290D (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Industries आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A. No.1084/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष/ Assessment Year:2018-19) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(1), Hydeabad. (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) VS. Penna Cement Industries Limited, Hy…

SAURASHTRA CEMENT LIMITED,PORBANDAR vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 307/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot08 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.307/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Saurashtra Cement Ltd. Principal Commissioner Of Near Railway Station, बनाम Income Tax, Jamnagar, Saurashtra Cement Factory, Jamnagar Vs. P.O. Ranavav, Adityana Road, Porbandar, Gujarat-360560 Pan : Aahfs5211J (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) : (""थ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Vimal Desai, Ld.Ar राज" की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanja Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/01/2026 Order

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanja Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 36(1)(iii)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, राजकोट "ायपीठ, राजकोट। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/.ITA No.307/RJT/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Saurashtra Cement Ltd. Principal Commissioner of Near Railway Station, बनाम Income Tax, Jamnagar, Saurashtra Cement Factory, Jamnagar Vs. P.O. Ranavav, Adityana Road, Porbandar, Gujarat-360560 PAN : AAHFS5211J (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) : (""थ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vimal Desai, ld.AR राज" की ओर से/Revenue by : Shri Sanja Punglia, L…

ACIT, CIRCLE - 3 3 1, MUMBAI vs. JAMNAGAR UTILITIES AND POWER PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed\npartly

ITA 5312/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Section 115JSection 135Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 43ASection 80G

…nter the CBDT circular no. 05/2014 on which the AO relied while\nmaking the disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, the appellant has relied on the\nfollowing case laws.\n(i) Hon'ble Delhi High Court, in case of PCIT v. IL & FS Energy\nDevelopment Company Ltd.[2017] 399 ITR 483 (Delhi) has\nconsidered the above mentioned CBDT Circular and held that the said\nCircular cannot override the express provisions of section 14A read with\nRule 8D. It was ultimately held that disallowance u/s.14A cannot be\nmade where no exempt income was earned by the assessee during the\nyear.\n(ii) Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal, too, in case of Kam…

ACIT, CIRCLE - 3 3 1, MUMBAI vs. JAMNAGAR UTILITIES AND POWER PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed\npartly

ITA 5310/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Section 115JSection 135Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 43ASection 80G

…nter the CBDT circular no. 05/2014 on which the AO relied while\nmaking the disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, the appellant has relied on the\nfollowing case laws.\n(i) Hon'ble Delhi High Court, in case of PCIT v. IL & FS Energy\nDevelopment Company Ltd.[2017] 399 ITR 483 (Delhi) has\nconsidered the above mentioned CBDT Circular and held that the said\nCircular cannot override the express provisions of Section 14A read with\nRule 8D. It was ultimately held that disallowance u/s.14A cannot be\nmade where no exempt income was earned by the assessee during the\nyear.\n(ii) Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal, too, in case of Kam…

ACIT, MUMBAI vs. K RAHEJA CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 5350/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

…\"disallowance\" of expenditure, as it would result in\nimposing tax on hypothetical income, which is wholly impermissible in law. We find that\nthe Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the decision rendered in the case of Pr. CIT Vs IL&FS\nEnergy Development Pvt Ltd (399 ITR 483) after considering the Board Circular\nNo.5/2014, has upheld the assessee's contention that, in absence of any exempt income\nearned in the year in question, the disallowance u/s 14A of the Act is unwarranted. The\nrelevant findings of the High Court is as under:\n18. The CBDT Circular upon which extensive reliance is placed by Mr. Hossain does n…

ACIT, MUMBAI vs. K RAHEJA CORPORATE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 5349/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Hemanshu Joshi, SR DR

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

…t be "disallowance" of expenditure, as it would result in imposing tax on hypothetical income, which is wholly impermissible in law. We find that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the decision rendered in the case of Pr. CIT Vs IL&FS Energy Development Pvt Ltd (399 ITR 483) after considering the Board Circular No.5/2014, has upheld the assessee's contention that, in absence of any exempt income earned in the year in question, the disallowance u/s 14A of the Act is unwarranted. The relevant findings of the High Court is as under: 18. The CBDT Circular upon which extensive reliance is placed by Mr. Hossain does not r…

DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER PVT. LTD., NABHA

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 121/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 121/Chd/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Dcit, M/S Glaxosmithkline Circle 1(1), बनाम Consumer Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh Patiala Road, Vs. Nabha. Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. Aafcg8415R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Hybrid Mode ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate With Sh. Neeraj Jain, Advocate & Ms. Somya Jain, Ca (Virtual) राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Manav Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 06.08.2025 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.10.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, Am:

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Neeraj Jain, Advocate and Ms. Somya Jain, For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT DR

Section 32(1)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘A’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 121/CHD/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 DCIT, M/s Glaxosmithkline Circle 1(1), बनाम Consumer Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh Patiala Road, Vs. Nabha. Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO. AAFCG8415R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Hybrid Mode ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Neeraj Jain, Advocate and Ms. Somya Jain, CA (Virtual) राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : S…

BIOPHORE INDIA PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 729/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: Sri S K Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: MS. U Mini Chandran, CIT-DR

Section 10(34)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144BSection 14ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD “A” BENCH: HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.729/Hyd./2025 Assessment Years 2020-2021 Biophore India Pharmaceuticals Private The DCIT, Circle-1(1), Limited, Hyderabad. vs. Hyderabad. PIN – 500 033. PAN AADCB0914C (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Sri S K Gupta, Advocate For Revenue : MS. U Mini Chandran, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 23.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 26.09.2025 ORDER PER MANJUNATHA G. : The above appeal has been filed by the assessee against the Order dated 27.02.2025 of the learne…

ACIT CIRCLE 3, LUCKNOW vs. RAJDHANI NAGAR SAHKARI BANK LTD, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 141/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Before Shri Kul Bharat & Before Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Nikhil Choudharyshri Nikhil Choudharyshri Nikhil Choudharyita Nos. 112 To 114/Lkw/2024 A.Ys. 2015-16 To 2017-18 Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Vs. Dcit Bank Ltd P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan 555Ga/86, Sardari Khera, 555Ga/86, Sardari Khera, Rai Marg, Lucknow-226001. 226001. Alambagh, Lucknow-226006 226006 Pan:Aaaar1269D (Appellant) (Respondent) (Respondent) A.Y.2016-17 Acit Circle-3 Vs. Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Bank Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Bank 57 Ram Tirath Marg Pratyaksh 57 Ram Tirath Marg Pratyaksh Ltd Kar Bhawan, Lucknow Kar Bhawan, Lucknow-226001 555Ga/86, Sardari Khera, 555Ga/86, Sardari Khera, Alambagh, Lucknow-226006 226006 Pan: Aaaar1269D (Appellant) (Respondent) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. K.R. Rastogi, C.A. Sh. Shubham Rastogi, C.A. Revenue By: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Addl. Cit- Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: Date Of Pronouncement: 22.05.2025 O R D E R Per Bench.: These Four Appeals Have Been Have Been Filed For The Assessment Years 2015 For The Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016- 17 & 2017-18 By The Assessee & Revenue Ssessee & Revenue Against The Respective Orders Of The Respective Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 02.02.2024, 05.02.2024 & 05.02.2024 Delhi Dated 02.02.2024, 05.02.2024 & 05.02.2024. While The Delhi Dated 02.02.2024, 05.02.2024 & 05.02.2024 Assessee Is In Appeal In Assessment Years 2015 Assessee Is In Appeal In Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18, The Revenue 18, The Revenue

For Appellant: Sh. K.R. Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

Section 36(1)(v)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 112 to 114/LKW/2024 A.Ys. 2015-16 to 2017-18 Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari vs. DCIT Bank Ltd P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan 555GA/86, Sardari Khera, 555GA/86, Sardari Khera, Rai Marg, Lucknow-226001. 22600…

RAJDHANI NAGAR SAHKARI BANK LTD,LUCKNOW vs. DY.CIT, LUCKNOW

ITA 114/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. K.R. Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. CIT-DR

Section 36(1)(v)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.112 to 114/LKW/2024 A.Ys.2015-16 to 2017-18 Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Bank Ltd vs. DCIT 555GA/86, Sardari Khera, Alambagh, Lucknow-226006 P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan Rai Marg, Lucknow-226001. PAN:AAAAR1269D (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.141/LKW/2024 A.Y.2016-17 ACIT Circle-3 vs. Rajdhani Nagar Sahkari Bank Ltd 57 Ram Tirath Marg Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, Lucknow-226001 555GA/86, Sardari Khera, Alambagh, Lucknow-226006 PAN: AAAAR1269D (Appellant) (Respondent) Asses…

RAJDHANI NAGAR SAHKARI BANK LTD,LUCKNOW vs. DY. CIT, LUCKNOW

ITA 113/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. K.R. Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. CIT-

Section 36(1)(v)Section 43B

…in the return. Therefore, no addition should be made in this regard. (2) The Ld. C.I.T. (A), NFAC failed to appreciate that CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014 dated 11.02.2014 has been examined by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case law reported in 452 ITR 206 and 399 ITR 483 and held that in the absence of exempt income, CBDT Circular cannot override express provisions of Section 14A of I. T. Act r. w. r. 8D of 1. T. Rules. Thus, the disallowance upheld Rs.58,09,459/-solely on the basis of CBDT Circular is not valid as per Law. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ABOVE 7 (3) That the deduction of Rs.16,43,987/- w. r. t. fall in V…

RAJDHANI NAGAR SAHKARI BANK LTD,LUCKNOW vs. DY.CIT, LUCKNOW

ITA 112/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Revenue byFor Respondent: Date of hearing

Section 36(1)(v)Section 43B

…in the return. Therefore, no addition should be made in this regard. (2) The Ld. C.I.T. (A), NFAC failed to appreciate that CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014 dated 11.02.2014 has been examined by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case law reported in 452 ITR 206 and 399 ITR 483 and held that in the absence of exempt income, CBDT Circular cannot override express provisions of Section 14A of I. T. Act r. w. r. 8D of 1. T. Rules. Thus, the disallowance upheld Rs.58,09,459/-solely on the basis of CBDT Circular is not valid as per Law. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ABOVE 7 ITA Nos.112 to 114/LKW/2024 ITA. No.141/LKW/2024 (3) That the…

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., AHMEDABAD

Accordingly, this ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 281/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2015-16 Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) M/S.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vejalpur Vs Corporate House Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaaci 5120 L Asstt.Year : 2015-16 M/S.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) Corporate House Vs Vejalpur S.G. Highway Ahmedabad. Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaaci 5120 L (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocae & Shri Parin Shah, Ar : Shri Ragnesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28/04/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/05/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14ASection 35Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37Section 92C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘D’ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE S/SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Asstt.Year : 2015-16 ACIT, Cir.2(1)(1) M/s.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vejalpur Vs Corporate House Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. PAN : AAACI 5120 L Asstt.Year : 2015-16 M/s.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd ACIT, Cir.2(1)(1) Corporate House Vs Vej…

INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

Accordingly, this ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 222/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2025AY 2015-16

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14ASection 35Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37Section 92C

DCIT, RANGE-6, LUCKNOW vs. M/S. U.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 229/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 14A

…I.T.A. No.227/Lkw/2020, 229/Lkw/20, 587/Lkw/19, 485/Lkw/19, 588/Lkw/19 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.227/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year: 2011-12 U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dy.C.I.T., Vipul Khand, Gomti Nagar, Range-VI, Lucknow. Lucknow. PAN:AAACU3394C (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No.229/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year: 2011-12 I.T.A. No.587/Lkw/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 I.T.A. No.485/Lkw/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 I.T.A. No.588/Lkw/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dy.…