Coforge Limited v. ACIT

436 ITR 546High Court2021#3830 most cited

What is Coforge Limited v. ACIT authority for?

A one-time payment of lease rent, even if commuted and discounted over a long period like 90 years, is revenue in nature and therefore an allowable business expenditure. The Assessing Officer must record satisfaction before applying Rule 8D for disallowance under Section 14A.

31

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Coforge Limited v. ACIT · 436 ITR 546 · 128 Taxmann.com 99 · lease rent · revenue expenditure · Section 14A · Rule 8D · satisfaction of AO · disallowance

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Coforge Limited v. ACIT

Coforge Limited v. ACIT (436 ITR 546) — Cited in 31 Judgments | BharatTax