Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT

142 Taxmann.com 414Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2022#3230 most cited

What is Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT authority for?

The requirement to file Form 67 by the due date for claiming foreign tax credit is directory, not mandatory, if filed before the completion of assessment proceedings.

37

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT · Form 67 · foreign tax credit · rule 128(9) · directory · mandatory · before completion of assessment · section 139(1)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT

Suresh Kumar Vobbilisetty, Hyderabad vs. Income Tax Officer, International Taxation-2, Hyderabad

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1204/HYD/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Mar 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1204/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Shri Suresh Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer Vobbilisetty, (International Taxation)-2 Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Acgpv5441G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca K Hemalatha राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Kumar Aditya, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 15/01/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/03/2025 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: CA K HemalathaFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 91

…ITA No 1204 of 2024 Suresh Kumar Vobbilisetty IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ SM- A‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1204/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Shri Suresh Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer Vobbilisetty, (International Taxation)-2 Hyderabad Hyderabad PAN:ACGPV5441G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee by: CA K Hemalatha राज" व "ारा/Revenue by:: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 15/01/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/03/2025 आदेश/ORDER Per Vij…

Income Tax Officer, Chennai vs. Sysarc Informatix Pvt.Ltd, Chennai

In the result, The appeal stand allowed’’

ITA 1213/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1213/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-2018) The Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Sysarc Informatix Private Limited, Corporate Ward 6(3) New No.13, Old No.195, Chennai. Defence Officers Colony, Nandambakkam, Chennai 600 032. [Pan : Aaecs 6891A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. Anitha, Irs, Addl. Cit. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. S. Subashini, C.A. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.09.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri ()

For Appellant: Ms. Anitha, IRS, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Ms. S. Subashini, C.A
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 90

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" एवं माननीय "ी मनु कुमार िग"र, "ाियक सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.1213/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-2018) The Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/s. Sysarc Informatix Private Limited, Corporate Ward 6(3) New No.13, Old No.195, Chennai. Defence Officers Colony, Nandambakkam, Chennai 600 032. [PAN : AAECS 6891A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Ms. Anith…

Income Tax Office, Ward-12(1), Hyderabad vs. Venigandla Krishna, Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 45/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Feb 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarआ.अपी.सं/Ita No. 45/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Income Tax Officer, Venigandla Krishna, Ward-12(1), Vs. Hyderabad Hyderabad [Pan : Bgkpv3694J] अपीलधर्थी/Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी/Respondent निर्धाररती‍द्वधरध/Assessee By: None रधजस्‍व‍द्वधरध/Revenue By: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Dr सुिवधई‍की‍तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 21/02/2024 घोर्णध की‍तधरीख/Pronouncement On: 27/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Laliet Kumar, J.M: Challenging The Order Dated 20-12-2023 Passed By The Learned Addl/Jcit(Appeals)-6, Mumbai, Revenue Preferred This Appeal For The Ay. 2021-22. 2. Facts In Brief Are That Assessee Is An Individual, Having Income From India & Abroad. He Has Filed The Income Tax Returns By Declaring Income From All Sources. Assessee Filed Form 67 After The Due Date Of Filing Income Tax Return & Claimed The Relief Under Section 90/9A Of The Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short “The Act”) Amounting To Rs. 59,07,195/-. During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, Assessing Officer Disallowed The Foreign Tax Credit (Ftc) Claimed By The Assessee & Finalized The Assessment. Aggrieved By Such A Finding Of The Assessing Officer, Assessee Preferred Appeal Before The Cit(A). 3. Learned Addl/Jcit(A) After Considering The Facts Of The Case, Allowed The Appeal Of Assessee, Directing The Jurisdictional Assessing Officer To Allow The Ftc As Per Form 67 Filed By The Assessee & Claimed In His Itr For The Said Year, By Stating As Under:

For Appellant: NONEFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR
Section 139Section 90

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं/ITA No. 45/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Income Tax Officer, Venigandla Krishna, Ward-12(1), Vs. Hyderabad Hyderabad [PAN : BGKPV3694J] अपीलधर्थी/Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी/Respondent निर्धाररती‍द्वधरध/Assessee by: NONE रधजस्‍व‍द्वधरध/Revenue by: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR सुिवधई‍की‍तधरीख/Date of hearing: 21/02/2024 घोर्णध की‍तधरीख/Pronouncement on: 27/02/2024 आदेश / ORDER PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M: Challengin…

Prashant Kurani, Mumbai vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2967/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyalआ.अ.सं.2967/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2020-21) Prashant Kurani A5-1001. A4, Castle Mill Compound, Thane - 400601 ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant Pan: Aaapk8762F बनाम Vs. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax, Centralised Processing Center, Income Tax Department, Bengaluru, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Karnataka – 560500

For Appellant: Shri Ninad PatadeFor Respondent: Shri H.M. Bhatt
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण मुंबई पीठ “सी”, मुंबई "ी िवकास अव"थी,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी गगन गोयल, लेखाकार सद" के सम" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं.2967/मुं/2023 (िन.व. 2020-21) Prashant Kurani A5-1001. A4, Castle Mill Compound, Thane - 400601 ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant PAN: AAAPK8762F बनाम Vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, Centralised Processing Center, Income Tax Department, Bengaluru, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Karnataka – 560500 Assessee by : Shri Ninad Patade Revenue by : Shri H.M. Bhatt सुनवाई क…

Mrs. Venkataraman Lakshmi, Chennai vs. ITO Non Corp Circle-7(1), Chennai

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 704/CHNY/2023[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Aug 2023AY 2019-2020

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.704/Chny/2023 (िनधा)रण वष) / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Mrs. Venkatraman Lakshmi Ito बनाम No.1, Palat Madhavan Road, Non –Corporate Circle-7(1), / Vs. Mahalingapuram, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Ajdpl-4567-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri J. Vignesh (Ca) - Ld. Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Ms. Deeptha M.S. (Jcit) - Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 31-08-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31-08-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2019-20 Arises Out Of The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 28-04-2023 In The Matter Of An Intimation Issued By Cpc, Bengaluru U/S 143(1) On 24-03-2021 Denying Foreign Tax Credit Of Rs.1.22 Lacs As Claimed By The Assessee U/S 90. The Same Was Denied For Want Of Filing Of Requisite Form 67 Along With Return Of Income.

For Appellant: Shri J. Vignesh (CA) - Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Deeptha M.S. (JCIT) - Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 90

…lu vs. DCIT (ITA No.990/Chny/2022 dated 16-02-2023) as under: - 4. We find that filing of Form 67 has been held to be directory and not mandatory in many decisions of the Tribunal. The Mumbai Tribunal, in its recent decision, titled as Sonakshi Sinha vs. CIT (142 Taxmann.com 414), held as under: - 12. We have carefully considered the rival contention and perused the orders of the lower authorities. Short question in this appeal is whether assessee is entitled to foreign tax credit even when form number 67 required to be filed according to the provisions of rule 128 (9) of the Income Tax Rules on or before the due…