ANKITA PALIWAL,ALIGARH, UTTAR PRADESH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that filing Form 67 is a directory and not a mandatory requirement. Violation of procedural norms does not extinguish the substantive right to claim FTC, and the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) override the rules.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) for taxes paid in the USA on salary income. The FTC was denied by the CPC for not filing Form 67 along with the return of income. The assessee filed Form 67 belatedly, and subsequent rectification and appeal attempts were unsuccessful.
What were the issues?
Whether the belated filing of Form 67 is fatal to the claim of Foreign Tax Credit, and if DTAA provisions override the procedural requirements of the Income-tax Rules.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ms. Brinda Ramakrishna v. ITO109 citing135 Taxmann.com 358 · 2022 · ITAT
- Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT37 citing162 Taxmann.com 96 · 2022 · ITAT
- Vinodkumar Lakshmipathi v. CIT (Appeals) NFAC21 citing145 Taxmann.com 235 · 2022 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRABENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR & SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR
PER RAMIT KOCHAR, AM:
This appeal in ITA No. 195/Agr/2024 for the assessment year
2018-19filed by the assesseehas arisen from the appellate order dated
2024 [DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1064036413(1)], passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax
(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi, which appeal before ld. CIT(A) has in turn arisen
from the rectification order dated 09.03.2021 passed by learned Assessing Officer u/s. 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961(DIN & Letter No.
ITBA/COM/F/17/2020-21/1031354866(1)).
Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in the Memo of appeal
filed with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Agra Bench, Agra, reads as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 90
- Amar Rameshkumar Bhalodia, Rajkot vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1), RajkotITA 641/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Fireeye Ireland Limited, Ireland vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 1431/DEL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Raghava Gupta Valiveti, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3)(4), BangaloreITA 2744/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026