SURESH KUMAR VOBBILISETTY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-2, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the filing of Form 67 is a directory requirement and not mandatory. Therefore, the FTC cannot be denied solely on the ground of delay in filing Form 67, especially when Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) provisions override the Act and Rules.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) under Section 91 of the Income Tax Act. The CPC denied the claim because Form 67 was filed beyond the due date for filing the return of income. The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether denial of Foreign Tax Credit is justified solely due to the delayed filing of Form 67, considering the provisions of DTAA and the directory nature of the rule.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(15)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT914 citing125 Taxmann.com 42 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan691 citing263 ITR 706 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
- Gramaphone Co. of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey146 citing132 Taxmann 373 · 2003 · SC
- Ms. Brinda Ramakrishna v. ITO109 citing135 Taxmann.com 358 · 2022 · ITAT
- Sambhaji and Others v. Gangabai and Others87 citing17 SCC 117 · 2008 · SC
- 42 Hertz Software India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT62 citing139 Taxmann.com 448 · 2022 · ITAT
- Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy v. PCIT50 citing460 ITR 615 · 2024 · HC
- Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT37 citing142 Taxmann.com 414 · 2022 · ITAT
- Vinodkumar Lakshmipathi v. CIT (Appeals) NFAC21 citing145 Taxmann.com 235 · 2022 · ITAT
- Trib.) (para 7), Sonakshi Sinha v. CIT (Appeals)15 citing197 ITD 263 · 2022 · ITAT
- Purushothama Reddy Vankireddy v. ADIT (International Taxation)8 citing147 Taxmann.com 398 · 2023 · ITAT
- Sumedha Arora v. Income7 citing154 Taxmann.com 535 · 2023 · HC
- NICDC Neemrana Solar Power Ltd. v. DCIT5 citing171 Taxmann.com 653 · HC
- Gaurav Singh v. ITO4 citing158 Taxmann.com 350 · 2024
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ SM- A‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Madhusudan Sawdia
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 24/0-9/2024 of the learned CIT (A)/ADDL/JCIT(A)-4, Chennai, for the A.Y.2021-22. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
The only issue arises in this appeal of the assessee is whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the first appellate authority is justified in confirming the action of CPC in denying the Foreign Tax Cred
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 91
- Avinash Developers Private Limited, Raipur vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, RaipurITA 598/RPR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Chintaginjala Mallikarjuna Sivaprasad… vs ITO, Ward-1, AnantapurITA 839/HYD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026