Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT

96 Taxmann.com 486High Court2018#1714 most cited

What is Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT authority for?

When an Assessing Officer (AO) submits a favourable remand report in response to the CIT(A)'s direction for further inquiry, the Revenue is bound by this report and cannot be treated as an aggrieved party to challenge the additions. The CIT(A) must consider such a report when deciding the appeal.

66

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,368 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT · Jayalakshmi ACIT · favourable remand report binding · Assessing Officer remand report · Revenue aggrieved party · CIT(A) powers · Section 250(4) · binding nature of remand report · CIT(A) bound by AO report · remand report supporting assessee · D. M. Purnesh

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT

ACIT 22 (3), Mumbai vs. M/S Rukhana Enterprises, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 6508/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita Nos. 6505 & 6508/Mum/2019 (A.Ys.2009-10 & 2012-13) Acit-22(3) Vs. M/S Rukhana Enterprises 305, 3Rd Floor, Piramal Centrum House, 8Th Floor Chambers, Lal Baug, Kalina, Santacruz (East), Parel, Mumbai – 400 012 Mumbai – 400 055 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aacfr6072M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Smt. Mahita Nair Respondent By : Shri Bhupendra Shah Date Of Hearing 13.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of Cit(A)-34, Mumbai, Dated 11.07.2019. Since Common Issue On Identical Facts Are Involved In These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue, Therefore, These Appeals Are Adjudicated Together By Taking Ita No. 6505/Mum/2019 As Lead Case & Its Finding Will Be Applied To Ita No. 6508/Mum/2019 Mutatis Mutandis. 1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.3,26,00,000/-Made On Bogus & Non Genuine Loan & The Proportionate Disallowance Of Interest Of Rs.21,96,699/- On The Said Loan Ignoring The Fact That The Assessee Completely Failed In Substantiating The Loan The Loan Taken From The Parties Who Are Involved In Providing Accommodation Entries Only.

For Appellant: Smt. Mahita NairFor Respondent: Shri Bhupendra Shah
Section 147Section 148Section 68

…P a g e | 1 2 Appeals ACIT-22(3) Vs. M/s Rukhana Enterprises IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 6505 & 6508/Mum/2019 (A.Ys.2009-10 & 2012-13) ACIT-22(3) Vs. M/s Rukhana Enterprises 305, 3rd Floor, Piramal Centrum House, 8th Floor Chambers, Lal Baug, Kalina, Santacruz (East), Parel, Mumbai – 400 012 Mumbai – 400 055 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AACFR6072M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Smt. Mahita Nair Respondent by : Shri Bhupendra Shah Date of Hearing 13.01.2023 Date of Pronounce…

ACIT 22 (3), Mumbai vs. M/S Rukhana Enterprises, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 6505/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita Nos. 6505 & 6508/Mum/2019 (A.Ys.2009-10 & 2012-13) Acit-22(3) Vs. M/S Rukhana Enterprises 305, 3Rd Floor, Piramal Centrum House, 8Th Floor Chambers, Lal Baug, Kalina, Santacruz (East), Parel, Mumbai – 400 012 Mumbai – 400 055 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aacfr6072M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Smt. Mahita Nair Respondent By : Shri Bhupendra Shah Date Of Hearing 13.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Common Order Of Cit(A)-34, Mumbai, Dated 11.07.2019. Since Common Issue On Identical Facts Are Involved In These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue, Therefore, These Appeals Are Adjudicated Together By Taking Ita No. 6505/Mum/2019 As Lead Case & Its Finding Will Be Applied To Ita No. 6508/Mum/2019 Mutatis Mutandis. 1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.3,26,00,000/-Made On Bogus & Non Genuine Loan & The Proportionate Disallowance Of Interest Of Rs.21,96,699/- On The Said Loan Ignoring The Fact That The Assessee Completely Failed In Substantiating The Loan The Loan Taken From The Parties Who Are Involved In Providing Accommodation Entries Only.

For Appellant: Smt. Mahita NairFor Respondent: Shri Bhupendra Shah
Section 147Section 148Section 68

…P a g e | 1 2 Appeals ACIT-22(3) Vs. M/s Rukhana Enterprises IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 6505 & 6508/Mum/2019 (A.Ys.2009-10 & 2012-13) ACIT-22(3) Vs. M/s Rukhana Enterprises 305, 3rd Floor, Piramal Centrum House, 8th Floor Chambers, Lal Baug, Kalina, Santacruz (East), Parel, Mumbai – 400 012 Mumbai – 400 055 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AACFR6072M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Smt. Mahita Nair Respondent by : Shri Bhupendra Shah Date of Hearing 13.01.2023 Date of Pronounce…

ITO, Ward - 5(4), Kolkata vs. M/S. Basil Tracom Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1888/KOL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Nov 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.1888/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Ito, Ward-5(4), Kolkata...…..………....……........…...…...…..….....Appellant Vs. M/S Basil Tracom Pvt. Ltd..…………….........…..................….……Respondent 42/1, B.B. Ganguly Street, Kolkata-700012. [Pan: Aabcb1880H] Appearances By: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, Cit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Manish Tiwari, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 15, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 24, 2022

Section 144Section 14ASection 250Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘सी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी "गर"श अ"वाल, लेखा सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.1888/Kol/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 ITO, Ward-5(4), Kolkata...…..………....……........…...…...…..….....Appellant vs. M/s Basil Tracom Pvt. Ltd..…………….........…..................….……Respondent 42/1, B.B. Ganguly Street, Kolkata-700012. [PAN: AABCB1880H] Appearances by: Shri G. Hukugha Sema, CIT, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA, appe…

Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax(OSD), Range-1, Hyderabad vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Hyderabad

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 882/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Jun 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L.P. Sahuassessment Year: 2012-13 Jcit (Osd) Range - 1 Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Hyderabad. Transport Corporation, [Apsrtc] Hyderabad. [Pan – Aagfaa3527J] (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Yvst Sai, Cit, Dr Assessee By: None Date Of Hearing: 08/04/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 11 /06/2021 O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, Jm: This Revenue’S Appeal For Ay 2012-13 Arises Against The Cit(A) - 1, Hyderabad’S Order Dated 15.12.2017 Passed In Case No 0170/2017- 18 Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ; In Short “The Act”.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH ‘B', HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 JCIT (OSD) Range - 1 Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Hyderabad. Transport Corporation, [APSRTC] Hyderabad. [PAN – AAGFAA3527J] (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue by: Shri YVST Sai, CIT, DR Assessee by: None Date of hearing: 08/04/2021 Date of pronouncement: 11 /06/2021 O R D E R PER S.S. GODARA, JM: This Revenue’s appeal for AY 2012-13 arises against the CIT(A) - 1, Hyderabad’s order dated 15.12.2017 passed in case no 0170/2017- 18 involving proc…