Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT

96 Taxmann.com 486High Court2018#1714 most cited

What is Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT authority for?

When an Assessing Officer (AO) submits a favourable remand report in response to the CIT(A)'s direction for further inquiry, the Revenue is bound by this report and cannot be treated as an aggrieved party to challenge the additions. The CIT(A) must consider such a report when deciding the appeal.

66

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,368 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT · Jayalakshmi ACIT · favourable remand report binding · Assessing Officer remand report · Revenue aggrieved party · CIT(A) powers · Section 250(4) · binding nature of remand report · CIT(A) bound by AO report · remand report supporting assessee · D. M. Purnesh

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Smt. B. Jayalakshmi v. ACIT

ITO, Ward-6(1), Kolkata vs. M/S D.S. Stocks Securities Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1881/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S. S. Godara, Jm आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.1881/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Ito, Ward-6(1), Kolkata Vs. M/S D.S. Stocks Securities Pvt. Ltd. 63, Radha Bazar Street, 3Rd Floor, Room No.43, Kol-1. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaacd9254E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. Cit Respondent By : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/10/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/11/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2012-13 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A) - 23, Kolkata Dated 01.06.2017 Passed In Case No.200/Cit(A)-23/Wd-6(1)/16-17 Involving Proceedings U/S 144 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’). Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused. 2. The Revenue’S Sole Substantive Grievance Raised During The Course Of Hearing Seeks To Reverse The Cit(A)’S Action Deleting Section 68 Unexplained Cash Credits Addition Of Rs.6,23,00,000/- In The Nature Of Share Capital/Premium Added By The Assessing Officer In His Assessment Order Dated 17.03.2015. The Assessing Authority Had Held That The Assessee Had Failed To Not Only To Prove Genuineness & Creditworthiness Of This Investor Entities Turning Out To Be Shell Companies But Also There Is No Explanation In Support Of Extraordinary Premium Charged Per Unit Of Shares.

For Appellant: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 144Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B”, BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM & SHRI S. S. GODARA, JM आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A No.1881/Kol/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) ITO, Ward-6(1), Kolkata Vs. M/s D.S. Stocks Securities Pvt. Ltd. 63, Radha Bazar Street, 3rd Floor, Room No.43, Kol-1. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAACD9254E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT Respondent by : Shri Miraj D. Shah, A/R सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 22/10/2019 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 27/11/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. Godara: This Revenue’s app…